The Symbiosis of Mind and Machine: Evolving Human Purpose and Work in the Age of Abundant Knowledge

Co-created by the Catalyzer Think Tank divergent thinking and Gemini Deep Research tool.

 

1. Executive Summary

The advent of advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the consequent abundance of knowledge herald an era of profound transformation, compelling a fundamental evolution in human purpose and work. This report posits that this evolution must steer away from current task-based paradigms towards a future where human endeavor is characterized by human-centric value creation, creativity, ethical stewardship, and the pursuit of intrinsic fulfillment. AI is rapidly redefining the nature of work by automating routine cognitive and manual tasks while augmenting human capabilities in complex domains. This shift simultaneously challenges traditional sources of purpose and opens new avenues for meaning, potentially leading to a “better life” characterized by enhanced well-being and societal flourishing.

The prospect of achieving sustainable 10% year-over-year global GDP growth, as posited in the context of this AI-driven transformation, requires critical examination. While AI promises significant productivity gains, such an ambitious growth target faces considerable feasibility and sustainability challenges within existing economic frameworks. Its pursuit must be harmonized with ecological limits and ensure equitable distribution of benefits, necessitating a potential re-evaluation of how progress itself is measured, moving beyond purely economic indicators.

Navigating this transition successfully demands strategic imperatives across multiple fronts. Educational systems must be reformed to cultivate uniquely human skills—critical thinking, creativity, emotional intelligence, and ethical reasoning—that AI cannot replicate. Governance structures must be established to ensure AI’s ethical development and deployment, aligning technological advancement with human values and societal well-being. Societal adaptation will involve fostering resilience, inclusivity, and new cultural narratives that value diverse forms of human contribution beyond traditional employment. Ultimately, this era presents an unprecedented opportunity to consciously shape a future where technology serves not as a replacement for human agency, but as a powerful catalyst for human flourishing and a more purposeful existence.

2. Introduction: The AI Revolution and the Imperative for Human Evolution

The contemporary world stands at the precipice of a revolution driven by the confluence of advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) and an unprecedented abundance of knowledge. This convergence is not merely an incremental technological step but a paradigm shift with the potential to reshape the very fabric of human existence, particularly our understanding of work and purpose.

The Confluence of Advanced AI and Abundant Knowledge:

The current wave of AI, characterized by powerful and capable large language models (LLMs) and generative AI, is proving to be as transformative as the steam engine was to the 19th-century Industrial Revolution.1 These sophisticated AI systems, developed by leading technology entities, possess the ability to summarize, code, reason, engage in dialogue, and even make decisions. This fundamentally alters how individuals access, process, and utilize knowledge, moving beyond simple information retrieval to active knowledge creation and synthesis.1 McKinsey’s research highlights AI’s long-term potential to add $4.4 trillion in productivity growth through corporate use cases alone, underscoring its economic significance.1

This technological surge is creating an era of “abundant knowledge.” AI’s capacity to sift through, structure, and derive insights from vast datasets means that information is not only more accessible but also more readily synthesized into actionable intelligence.1 However, this abundance is not without its complexities. While AI offers powerful tools for understanding, the sheer volume and the AI-mediated nature of this knowledge present new challenges. There is a potential for cognitive offloading, where an over-reliance on AI for answers could lead to a diminishment of human critical thinking and analytical skills if not consciously managed.3 Furthermore, the knowledge generated and filtered by AI systems may carry inherent biases from their training data or design, potentially leading to the propagation of “mediocrity engines” that standardize information rather than fostering diverse and nuanced understanding.1 Consequently, the core challenge shifts from merely accessing knowledge to developing the human capacity for critical engagement, validation, and creative application of AI-generated insights. This necessitates a focus on meta-cognitive skills—thinking about how we think and learn—to navigate this new, complex information landscape effectively.

The Fundamental Challenge to Existing Paradigms of Work and Purpose:

The capabilities of modern AI directly challenge long-standing paradigms of work, many of which are built upon routine tasks and specialized human knowledge that AI can now automate or significantly augment.1 The World Economic Forum has projected that automation could displace up to 85 million jobs by 2025, underscoring the urgency for human adaptation and the re-evaluation of skills.8 This displacement is not confined to manual labor; knowledge work, traditionally considered safe from automation, is also being profoundly impacted.7

Beyond the economic and structural shifts in work, AI instigates a deeper, philosophical rupture. The increasingly sophisticated intelligence displayed by AI systems blurs the historically clear distinction between human and machine.9 This challenges the anthropocentric view of intelligence and, by extension, forces a re-examination of what makes humans unique and what constitutes human purpose in a world where cognitive tasks can be performed by non-human entities.9

The imperative for human evolution is thus driven by a dual dynamic of threat and opportunity. The palpable threat of job displacement and skill obsolescence acts as a powerful motivator for change.7 Simultaneously, AI presents an unprecedented opportunity to augment human capabilities, liberate individuals from drudgery, and empower us to tackle complex global challenges with greater efficacy.1 This duality implies that the evolutionary path forward is not solely about survival in the face of technological disruption but also about thriving by unlocking new dimensions of human potential and well-being. Therefore, strategies for adaptation must be multifaceted, encompassing defensive measures such as reskilling and social safety nets, alongside proactive initiatives aimed at fostering innovation and exploring new frontiers of human endeavor.

This report seeks to address the central question arising from these disruptions: In light of AI’s transformative power and the dawn of abundant knowledge, what must human purpose and work evolve into? Why is this evolution necessary for achieving a “better life” and fostering sustainable global prosperity? And, critically, how can this profound transformation be navigated and achieved?

3. Redefining Human Purpose in an Age of Intelligent Augmentation

The rise of AI necessitates a profound re-evaluation of human purpose. As machines increasingly demonstrate capabilities once thought exclusive to humans, our traditional understanding of uniqueness and meaning is being challenged, paving the way for new philosophical perspectives and sources of fulfillment.

Philosophical Shifts: Beyond Human Exceptionalism to Human-AI Symbiosis:

For centuries, human identity and purpose have been deeply intertwined with the concept of human exceptionalism, largely grounded in our unique intelligence.9 The modern era, in particular, established a clear distinction between intelligent, conscious humans and non-intelligent, mechanistic machines.9 AI, with its capacity for learning, reasoning, and problem-solving, directly confronts this dichotomy.1 This does not necessarily mean AI is “intelligent” in precisely the same way humans are; human intelligence encompasses dimensions like consciousness, discernment (the ability to judge nuance and distinguish the real from the unreal, often termed Viveka in Sanskrit traditions), and intuition, which AI, in its current form, does not replicate.11 However, AI’s capabilities do suggest that intelligence can manifest in multiple forms.

This realization prompts a philosophical shift away from a singular notion of human exceptionalism towards an understanding of potential human-AI symbiosis.9 In this symbiotic model, AI is not merely a tool but an augmentation partner, capable of enhancing human intellect and even facilitating deeper self-understanding. As Tobias Rees suggests, AI could make humans “visible to ourselves in ways no human interlocutor can,” by reflecting our patterns of thought and behavior.9 This evolving relationship implies that human purpose may increasingly be found not in standing apart from technology, but in skillfully and ethically engaging with it to amplify our own capacities.

New Sources of Meaning, Fulfillment, and Contribution in a Post-Task Society:

If AI automates a significant portion of current jobs, particularly those involving routine tasks 6, the question of where humans will find purpose becomes paramount. The answer may lie in a societal pivot towards activities that are intrinsically human and fulfilling, but which have often been overshadowed by economic imperatives. A future where basic needs are more easily met, perhaps through new economic models like Universal Basic Income (UBI) or resource-based economies, could free individuals to pursue work driven by passion, curiosity, and a desire to contribute, rather than solely by financial necessity.12

Potential avenues for such purpose-driven engagement are abundant: advancing scientific discovery, creating art and culture, fostering community and social connections, dedicating time to caregiving and education, and engaging in lifelong learning for personal growth.12 This shift could see a transition from a primary focus on “economic labor” to what some term “virtue labor”—activities that enrich society and individual well-being, such as learning, community service, and caregiving.14 This redefinition of purpose is, in many ways, a return to and an expansion of intrinsic human drives. Historically, much human labor has been dictated by extrinsic needs like survival and economic gain. AI’s potential to automate many of these tasks creates the space for a societal re-prioritization of these intrinsic motivations—for creativity, learning, connection, and care—which have always been present but often secondary. The “new” purpose, therefore, is not entirely novel but rather a broader societal validation and enabling of these deep-seated human aspirations, potentially leading to greater overall fulfillment, as ancient wisdom traditions have long encouraged through paths of self-evolution and the discovery of our inherent possibilities.11 To realize this, societal structures, including education, economic systems, and cultural values, will need to evolve to support and reward these intrinsic pursuits, not just those deemed economically productive in a traditional sense.

The Role of Creativity, Empathy, Critical Inquiry, and Ethical Reasoning:

As AI systems become more adept at handling analytical and routine cognitive tasks, the value of uniquely human skills will escalate.16 These are not merely “soft skills” but essential competencies for navigating and shaping an AI-suffused world.

• Creativity: This remains a cornerstone of human contribution. While AI can generate novel outputs, human creativity involves synthesizing disparate ideas, imagining entirely new frameworks, and imbuing work with unique perspectives and emotional depth—abilities that machines are still far from replicating.16 David Usher notes that creativity is vital in everything from negotiation to product development and will be our competitive advantage as agentic AI takes over more tasks.16
• Emotional Intelligence (EQ): The capacity to understand and manage one’s own emotions and those of others is distinctly human.16 In a workplace increasingly mediated by technology, EQ becomes critical for effective collaboration, leadership, and navigating the human aspects of change. Machines lack genuine empathy and self-awareness, creating opportunities for emotionally intelligent individuals to thrive.16
• Critical Thinking and Inquiry: AI can process vast amounts of data, but critical thinking—the ability to analyze information objectively, discern nuance, evaluate arguments, and navigate complex, ambiguous situations—remains a crucial human skill.16 It is the foundation of sound judgment and effective decision-making in contexts where AI-generated information must be interpreted and applied wisely.
• Ethical Reasoning: The power of AI necessitates a profound engagement with ethics. AI systems operate based on their programming and data, without inherent moral understanding.5 The potential societal impacts of AI are immense, carrying both promise and peril.1 Consequently, human oversight, guided by robust ethical principles, is indispensable.19 This means that a core component of human purpose in an AI-driven world will be the active stewardship of this technology—ensuring its development and deployment align with human values, promote fairness, and contribute to overall well-being. Ethical reasoning, therefore, transitions from a specialized concern or a compliance checkbox to a foundational element of responsible human agency in the 21st century. This requires a widespread cultivation of ethical literacy and the capacity for moral judgment 4, deeply integrated into all levels of education and professional development.

The arts, humanities, and philosophy will play an increasingly vital role in this context. These disciplines are essential not only for analyzing the societal impacts of AI but also for shaping the fundamental design and ethical deployment of AI technologies to ensure they support human flourishing, creativity, and critical thinking.20 They provide the frameworks for understanding cultural context, human values, and the ethical implications of technological choices, humanizing technology and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.21

4. The Metamorphosis of Work: From Routine Tasks to Human-Centric Value Creation

The integration of AI into the global economy is not merely automating tasks; it is fundamentally reshaping the nature of work itself. This metamorphosis involves a shift away from an emphasis on routine labor towards new paradigms centered on human-AI collaboration, strategic oversight, and the creation of uniquely human value.

AI as a Catalyst for Automating Cognitive and Routine Labor:

AI’s capacity to automate extends far beyond simple physical tasks. It is increasingly proficient at handling a wide array of cognitive and routine labor across diverse industries. In sectors such as manufacturing, customer service, and logistics, AI-powered robots and chatbots are streamlining production lines and managing basic inquiries, freeing human workers for more complex responsibilities.5 This automation encompasses data-driven tasks in finance, where AI processes real-time market data, and in healthcare, where it assists in analyzing medical data for diagnostics.5 Administrative functions like invoice processing, data entry, and even the generation of initial drafts for reports and presentations are being efficiently handled by AI systems.6 This capability to automate cognitive functions, including planning and decision-making support, distinguishes the current AI revolution from previous technological waves, allowing employees to divert their focus from mundane chores to more strategic and innovative activities.1

The Emergence of New Work Paradigms: Collaborative Intelligence, Strategic Oversight, and Innovation:

As AI assumes responsibility for routine execution, human roles are evolving towards strategic oversight, creative problem-solving, and collaborative intelligence. The future of work is not one of humans being replaced wholesale by machines, but rather one where humans work in tandem with AI systems.6 This model positions AI as a “thought partner” or “collaborative partner”.1 AI can provide rapid, data-driven insights and analyze vast datasets far exceeding human capacity, while humans contribute critical judgment, contextual understanding, ethical considerations, and creative interpretation to make informed strategic decisions.5

This collaborative dynamic fosters innovation. By automating routine aspects of work, AI liberates human cognitive resources and time, which can then be dedicated to more creative and innovative projects.5 In fields like product design and development, AI can analyze user data and market trends, enabling engineers and designers to create more targeted and effective solutions.5 Leadership roles are also transforming; with AI handling operational efficiencies and data analysis, human leaders can concentrate on long-term vision, ethical guidance, fostering adaptability within their organizations, and cultivating a culture of innovation.5 The shift is from direct task execution to the strategic management and supervision of AI systems, emphasizing uniquely human-centric skills.6

The Future of Knowledge Work and the Uniquely Human Contributions:

Knowledge work, characterized by its reliance on cognitive skills, creativity, complex problem-solving, and the analysis of intricate information, is undergoing a significant reshaping due to AI.7 While AI can undoubtedly enhance efficiency and productivity in knowledge-intensive sectors like finance, healthcare, and education, concerns about job displacement and the changing nature of expertise persist.7

However, the most effective AI tools for knowledge synthesis and decision-making are those that successfully integrate the user’s work context, personal domain knowledge, and the iterative nature of human decision-making processes.2 This underscores the continued, and perhaps even enhanced, importance of human expertise in guiding, validating, and interpreting AI outputs. Humans excel in areas where AI currently falls short: synthesizing disparate ideas into novel concepts, navigating ambiguity and nuance, understanding implicit context, and engaging in complex decision-making that requires ethical judgment and a deep understanding of human factors.16 As AI handles the “knowns,” human intelligence will increasingly focus on exploring the “unknowns,” framing new questions, and driving innovation at the frontiers of knowledge.

Critiques of Current Task-Based Work in Light of AI:

The current economic paradigm, particularly in its application of AI, often exhibits a bias towards the automation of narrow, existing tasks, effectively substituting machine labor for human labor.24 This approach, while potentially offering short-term efficiency gains, has been critiqued for its insufficient focus on creating entirely new tasks and roles where human labor can be productively and meaningfully employed.24 Such a bias can lead to adverse macroeconomic consequences, including stagnating demand for labor, a declining share of labor in national income, and widening income inequality.24

The very definition and decomposition of work into “tasks” suitable for AI present challenges related to discretisation (separating one task from another) and the appropriate level of granularity.25 Furthermore, understanding the implications of AI’s evolving autonomy (its ability to operate without direct human control) and generality (its capacity to perform a wide range of tasks or adapt to new situations) is crucial for assessing its true impact on the workplace.25 A narrow focus on task automation may overlook opportunities for AI to augment human capabilities in more holistic ways or to enable the creation of entirely new industries and job categories.

The metamorphosis of work driven by AI necessitates a fundamental shift in how human contribution is valued. Historically, human value in many work contexts was closely tied to efficiency in performing specific, often repetitive or data-intensive, tasks.5 AI is demonstrating an increasing capacity to perform these tasks with greater speed, accuracy, and lower cost.14 Consequently, the locus of human value must transition to domains where AI remains comparatively weak. These include the complex framing of problems (not merely solving predefined ones), the application of ethical judgment, the generation of profound and original creativity, the nuanced navigation of interpersonal dynamics, and the exercise of strategic foresight.5 In this evolving landscape, “value creation” will be defined less by the quantity of output in routine areas and more by the quality of insight, the novelty of innovation, and the human-centric guidance provided in complex situations. This implies a significant redesign of performance metrics, reward systems, and organizational structures to recognize, cultivate, and incentivize these new forms of human value. The emphasis will shift from managing human execution to fostering human ingenuity.

The success of this new collaborative paradigm between humans and AI hinges critically on ensuring “adaptable user control” and “transparent collaboration mechanisms”.2 While AI is a powerful tool, its outputs are not infallible and may lack the nuanced contextual understanding that falls outside the scope of its training data and algorithms.1 For human-AI collaboration to be truly effective, individuals must be empowered to guide AI processes, verify AI-generated outputs, and integrate their own domain expertise and critical judgment.2 This requires the development of AI systems that are designed with workflow flexibility and user autonomy at their core. Transparent operational mechanisms, which allow users to understand the basis of AI’s suggestions or decisions (or their limitations), are also crucial.2 Without such features, there is a significant risk of over-reliance on automation, the uncritical acceptance of AI-generated information (potentially leading to confirmation bias), or the misuse of AI outputs.2 Therefore, the design of AI tools for the workplace must be fundamentally human-centered, prioritizing user control, interpretability, and seamless integration into diverse human workflows, rather than attempting to design humans out of the loop. This represents a significant business and design challenge, extending beyond mere technological implementation.1

The following table contrasts the current task-based work paradigm with the emerging future of purpose-driven, human-centric work:

Table 1: Contrasting Paradigms: Current Task-Based Work vs. Future Purpose-Driven, Human-Centric Work

Aspect	Current Task-Based Paradigm	Future Purpose-Driven, Human-Centric Paradigm
Primary Human Focus	Task execution, process adherence	Problem framing, innovation, ethical oversight, strategic thinking
Key Skills Utilized	Specialized technical skills, efficiency in routine tasks	Creativity, critical thinking, emotional intelligence (EQ), complex problem-solving, systems thinking, ethics
AI’s Role	Tool for efficiency, automation of discrete tasks	Collaborative partner, cognitive augmenter, source of insights, tool for complex simulations
Primary Value Metric	Output quantity, productivity, cost reduction	Impact, meaning, innovation, quality of insight, human well-being, sustainability
Organizational Structure	Often hierarchical, siloed	Agile, networked, collaborative, flatter hierarchies
Source of Fulfillment	Extrinsic rewards (salary, job security), task completion	Intrinsic rewards (personal growth, societal contribution, sense of purpose), creative expression
Learning & Development	Episodic training for specific skills	Continuous lifelong learning, adaptability, development of meta-cognitive skills
Decision-Making	Often data-informed but reliant on established procedures	Data-driven with AI insights, augmented by human judgment, ethical considerations, and intuitive understanding
Relationship with Technology	User of tools	Co-creator with intelligent systems, critical evaluator of technology

This table encapsulates the profound shift anticipated, highlighting that the evolution of work is not just about new tools, but a new philosophy of human contribution in an increasingly intelligent world.

5. Pathways to a “Better Life”: AI-Driven Well-being and Societal Flourishing

The transformative potential of AI extends beyond economic productivity and the redefinition of work; it holds considerable promise for enhancing human well-being and fostering societal flourishing, contributing to what many hope will be a “better life.” However, realizing this potential requires a deliberate focus on leveraging AI for positive human outcomes while proactively addressing its psychological and social impacts, and adopting broader measures of progress.

Leveraging AI for Enhanced Quality of Life:

AI applications are already demonstrating significant benefits across various sectors crucial to human well-being. In healthcare, AI is aiding in more accurate diagnostics, accelerating drug discovery and development, and streamlining administrative tasks, thereby allowing medical professionals to dedicate more time to direct patient care.6 AI’s analytical capabilities are being harnessed to mitigate climate change by optimizing energy consumption, improving resource management, and developing new green energy solutions.10 The transportation sector is being revolutionized by AI-driven advancements like self-driving cars and intelligent traffic management systems, which promise increased safety, reduced congestion, and lower fuel consumption.10 Furthermore, AI is contributing to improved agricultural practices for better food security and enhancing cybersecurity to protect individuals and infrastructure.10

Beyond these large-scale applications, AI can enhance daily life by enabling more flexible work arrangements, such as remote and hybrid models, which can lead to improved work-life balance and reduced stress for employees.6 AI-powered tools can automate tedious tasks, freeing up individuals’ time and mental energy for more meaningful pursuits, both professionally and personally.6

Addressing the Psychological Impacts: Fostering Engagement and Mitigating Alienation:

The integration of AI into work and daily life is not without its psychological challenges. The need to constantly adapt to new AI systems and the anxieties surrounding job security or skill obsolescence can lead to negative psychological and physiological effects, including stress, burnout, fatigue, anxiety, and sleep problems.27 Experts express considerable concern that without careful management, AI adoption could negatively alter our sense of purpose and affect how we think, feel, and relate to one another, potentially diminishing mental well-being, sense of agency, and identity.4

However, research also indicates that AI usage can have positive psychological outcomes. AI can enhance work engagement by increasing employees’ “psychological availability”—their confidence and readiness to dedicate cognitive and emotional resources to their roles.28 This occurs as AI takes over mundane tasks, reduces cognitive overload, and allows for greater autonomy and focus on more stimulating aspects of work.28

The critical factor often lies in how AI is implemented. If AI systems heavily substitute the core characteristics of an individual’s job—such as autonomy, task identity, and significance—it can lead to feelings of work alienation, powerlessness, and meaninglessness.28 Conversely, when AI augments human skills and supports meaningful work, it can reduce alienation. Therefore, achieving a “better life” through AI is not an automatic consequence of technological deployment. It necessitates proactive management of these psychological and social externalities. This includes designing AI systems with human well-being in mind, providing adequate training and support for individuals adapting to new technologies, fostering a culture of critical and mindful engagement with AI rather than passive reliance 3, and exploring how AI itself can be used to personalize mental health support and enhance human connection.26 Investment in AI development must be paralleled by investment in understanding and addressing its human impact.

Beyond GDP: Incorporating Holistic Measures of Progress and Well-being:

The pursuit of a “better life” in an AI-driven future calls for a re-evaluation of how societal progress is measured. Gross Domestic Product (GDP), while a useful indicator of economic activity, is widely criticized for its inadequacy in capturing the multifaceted nature of human well-being and societal flourishing.30 GDP does not account for crucial aspects such as the quality of life, levels of social inclusiveness, the health of the environment, the value of unpaid care work, or the distribution of income and opportunity.30

In response to these limitations, “Beyond GDP” approaches advocate for the adoption of more holistic dashboards of indicators. These frameworks aim to measure progress across multiple dimensions, including current well-being (health, education, life satisfaction), social and economic resources for future well-being, resilience to societal challenges, the state of nature and planetary boundaries, and levels of inclusiveness.30 Examples of such initiatives include the United Nations’ Human Development Index (HDI), the OECD’s Better Life Index (BLI), and various national and regional efforts to develop comprehensive well-being frameworks.31

Adopting such holistic measures is not merely an academic exercise in finding alternative metrics; it becomes a necessary framework for guiding AI development and deployment towards a genuinely “better life.” If GDP remains the predominant measure of progress, AI innovation will likely continue to be optimized primarily for productivity and economic output, potentially at the expense of broader human well-being, equity, or environmental sustainability.30 A “better life” inherently encompasses these wider dimensions. By integrating “Beyond GDP” metrics into national and global assessments of progress, policymakers and societal leaders can create incentives that steer AI development and application in a more human-centric direction, ensuring that technological advancements translate into tangible improvements in the aspects of life that truly matter for human and planetary flourishing.

6. The Quest for Sustainable Prosperity: Deconstructing 10% Annual GDP Growth

The prospect of AI driving unprecedented economic expansion has led to ambitious forecasts, including the notion of achieving sustainable 10% annual global GDP growth. However, a rigorous examination of current economic projections, the inherent limitations of AI’s impact on traditional growth metrics, and the imperative for ecological sustainability and equitable distribution necessitates a critical deconstruction of this target.

Analyzing AI’s Potential Contribution to Economic Output: Forecasts and Realities:

Several prominent organizations have projected significant economic gains from AI. PwC, for instance, estimates that AI could boost global economic output by up to 15 percentage points over the next decade, which translates to an effective addition of 1 to 1.5 percentage points to annual growth rates.32 Another PwC report, cited by the World Economic Forum and Brookings, suggests AI could add $15.7 trillion (a 14% increase) to the global economy by 2030.33 McKinsey Global Institute anticipates a long-term AI opportunity of $4.4 trillion in added productivity growth from corporate use cases 1, while Goldman Sachs forecasts a 7% increase in global GDP over 10 years due to AI.35

These figures, while substantial, must be juxtaposed with more conservative estimates. MIT Professor Daron Acemoglu, for example, projects a more modest GDP boost for the U.S. economy of approximately 1% over the entire next decade (roughly 0.1% annually).35 Acemoglu’s caution stems from his analysis that only a small fraction of tasks (around 5% economy-wide) might be profitably performed by AI within that timeframe, considering the high costs of implementation for many applications, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises.35 Other limiting factors include the potentially diminishing productivity returns as AI is applied to more complex “hard tasks” beyond easily automatable ones, the current mismatch between large-scale AI investment by big tech and the needs of diverse industries, and the “adjustment costs” associated with organizational adaptation to new AI-driven workflows.35

The Feasibility and Sustainability of 10% Annual Global GDP Growth in an AI-Driven Economy:

When measured against these expert forecasts, a sustained 10% annual global GDP growth target appears highly ambitious, if not unrealistic, within current economic paradigms. Even the most optimistic scenarios, such as PwC’s projection of a 1.5% annual boost from AI, fall significantly short of this 10% figure.32 Historically, such high global growth rates have been exceptionally rare, typically occurring in specific regions for limited periods during catch-up phases of development, rather than sustainably across the entire global economy.

Furthermore, the pursuit of such aggressive growth raises profound sustainability concerns. Increased AI adoption is intrinsically linked to higher energy consumption, primarily due to the power demands of data centers and computational infrastructure.32 While AI can also be deployed to optimize energy efficiency and develop green technologies, there is a tangible risk that the net effect could be an increased environmental burden if energy use is not meticulously managed and sourced from renewables.32 PwC’s analysis also indicates that physical climate risks, such as extreme weather events and resource scarcity, could significantly constrain economic output, potentially reducing the global economy by nearly 7% by 2035 compared to a scenario without such risks.32 This underscores the tension between a purely growth-oriented agenda and the ecological limits of the planet.

The 10% annual GDP growth target, therefore, seems largely unachievable and potentially misaligned with the broader goals of “sustainable prosperity” and a “better life” if pursued through conventional economic models and metrics. Current expert forecasts for AI’s direct GDP impact are considerably lower. Achieving such a figure would necessitate either a radical, unforeseen acceleration in AI’s economic impact far beyond current projections, a fundamental redefinition of “GDP” and “growth” to encompass non-traditional forms of value (such as unpaid care work or environmental regeneration, which AI could potentially support), or it may simply represent an unattainable goal that could lead to detrimental social and environmental consequences if pursued without caution. The focus, perhaps, should shift from the sheer quantity of growth to the quality, sustainability, and equitable distribution of the value generated by AI.

Table 2: AI-Driven Global GDP Growth: Forecasts, Assumptions, and Critical Evaluation of 10% Target

 

Source/Study	Projected GDP Impact	Timeframe	Key Assumptions	Critical Evaluation for 10% Annual Target & Sustainability
PwC (Value in Motion, 2025)	Up to 15 percentage points boost to global economic output (effectively 1-1.5% annually from AI)	Next decade	Responsible deployment, clear governance, public/organizational trust, rapid reconfiguration of economy	Falls significantly short of 10% annually. Highlights climate risk constraints (7% smaller economy by 2035). Notes AI energy use needs offsetting via efficiency gains.32
PwC (cited by WEF/Brookings, 2017/2018)	$15.7 trillion (14%) increase in global GDP	By 2030	Improvements in labor productivity and increased consumer demand from product enhancements	Implies an average annual growth contribution from AI well below 10%. Does not deeply address sustainability of this growth in original context.33
McKinsey Global Institute (Superagency, 2025)	$4.4 trillion in added productivity growth potential from corporate use cases	Long-term	Business adoption of AI for specific use cases	Significant, but a component of overall GDP, not total GDP growth. Focus on productivity, less on overall GDP rate or sustainability in this specific figure.1
Goldman Sachs (2023, cited by Acemoglu)	7% increase in global GDP	Over 10 years	Widespread adoption of generative AI leading to productivity gains	Averages 0.7% annually, far from 10%. Acemoglu critiques such forecasts as potentially over-optimistic in the short term.35
Daron Acemoglu (MIT, 2025)	Approx. 1% U.S. GDP boost (translates to ~0.1% annually)	Next 10 years	Only ~5% of tasks profitably performed by AI; limited gains from “hard tasks”; adjustment costs; investment mismatch	Drastically lower than 10%. Emphasizes limitations of current AI trajectory for broad economic impact. Suggests current AI focus may not be optimal for productivity.35

Reconciling Economic Expansion with Ecological Limits and Equitable Distribution:

A relentless pursuit of high GDP growth, especially at a 10% annual rate, inevitably collides with planetary boundaries.30 The concept of a “post-growth” paradigm, which challenges the assumption that ever-increasing GDP necessarily enhances human well-being within ecological limits, becomes increasingly relevant.30 Furthermore, there is a significant risk that AI-driven economic growth, if not managed equitably, will exacerbate existing inequalities. The benefits could accrue disproportionately to the owners of AI technologies and a highly skilled segment of the workforce, while many others face job displacement or wage stagnation.7 This necessitates policies that actively promote the wide sharing of AI-generated productivity gains, ensuring they contribute to broad societal well-being rather than merely inflating aggregate GDP figures while leaving many behind.

Exploring Alternative Economic Models for an Era of Abundance:

The profound changes AI is expected to bring to labor markets and wealth creation are prompting serious consideration of alternative economic models. As traditional human labor becomes less central to the production of goods and services 8, existing capitalist structures, which heavily rely on labor for income distribution, may prove inadequate. This makes the exploration of alternative models not just a theoretical exercise but a potential necessity for societal stability and equity.

• Universal Basic Income (UBI): This model proposes providing all citizens with a regular, unconditional income, ensuring a basic standard of living regardless of employment status.37 UBI aims to mitigate poverty and economic insecurity resulting from automation-induced job displacement, allowing individuals the financial freedom to adapt, retrain, or pursue non-market activities like education, caregiving, or creative endeavors.12 However, UBI faces critiques regarding its fiscal sustainability, potential inflationary effects, the risk of disincentivizing work, and concerns that, if not designed carefully, it could entrench existing power disparities between AI owners and the general populace.36
• Resource-Based Economy (RBE): A more radical proposition, the RBE envisions a system where all essential goods and services are freely available based on need, rather than through monetary exchange or trade.12 In such a model, AI and automation would manage resources efficiently, potentially eliminating the need for money and private ownership of core productive assets, with a focus on shared community access and sustainability.13
• Social Purpose Markets / Virtue Labor: This concept suggests creating market-based incentives for socially beneficial activities that AI cannot readily perform, such as learning, caregiving, community service, and artistic creation.14 Individuals would be rewarded not for traditional economic labor, which machines increasingly handle, but for “virtue labor” that contributes to personal and societal well-being, thus providing a new avenue for purpose and economic participation.14
• Post-Capitalist Models: These encompass a broader range of ideas aiming to transcend current capitalism by prioritizing human well-being, technological efficiency for the common good, ecological balance, and the pursuit of purpose over profit maximization and jobs purely for survival.13 Elements might include advanced forms of UBI (sometimes termed “Universal Basic Infrastructure” providing essential services directly), decentralized AI-assisted governance for fair resource distribution, and the widespread adoption of circular economic principles to eliminate waste and promote sustainability.13

The increasing plausibility of these alternative economic models stems directly from AI’s potential to diminish the centrality of traditional human labor in the production process. If AI and automation significantly reduce the necessity for human input in many sectors, fundamental questions arise: How will the immense wealth generated by AI be distributed if fewer people are “earning” it through conventional employment? How will individuals achieve economic security and find meaning? These alternative models offer conceptual frameworks for decoupling income and well-being from traditional employment, addressing the specter of mass technological unemployment, and harnessing AI-driven abundance for broader societal benefit. Their exploration, experimentation, and robust public debate are crucial for proactively preparing for a future where the nature of work and its role in the economy are fundamentally transformed. This is not merely an economic challenge but a profound societal and political one, requiring foresight and courage to reimagine our socio-economic structures.

Table 4: Overview of Alternative Economic Models for an AI-Driven Future

 

Model	Core Principles	How it Addresses AI’s Impact	Potential Benefits	Key Challenges/Criticisms
Universal Basic Income (UBI)	Regular, unconditional income for all citizens.	Mitigates job displacement by automation, provides economic security.	Reduces poverty, improves health/education outcomes, supports entrepreneurship, allows pursuit of non-market activities.12	Fiscal sustainability, potential inflation, work disincentives, political feasibility, risk of entrenching power disparities if not well-designed.36
Resource-Based Economy (RBE)	Goods/services freely available based on need; AI manages resources; no money; shared ownership of productive assets.	Leverages AI for efficient resource allocation in a post-scarcity scenario; eliminates need for traditional jobs for survival.	Potential for abundance, elimination of poverty/waste, focus on sustainability and human development.12	Radical societal restructuring required, technological feasibility at scale, governance challenges, potential loss of individual economic agency.
Social Purpose Markets / Virtue Labor	Market incentives for socially beneficial, human-centric activities (care, learning, community service) that AI cannot perform.	Creates new avenues for “work” and income based on societal contribution rather than traditional economic output.	Provides purpose and income in a post-work society, values intrinsically human contributions, enhances social well-being.14	Defining/measuring “virtue,” avoiding coercion, ensuring fair compensation, potential for new forms of inequality or exploitation.
Post-Capitalist Elements (General)	Prioritizes human well-being, ecological balance, purpose over profit; may include UBI 2.0 (basic infrastructure), decentralized AI governance, circular economies.	Aims to create a more intelligent, just, and sustainable system beyond current capitalism, using AI for public good.	Enhanced quality of life, reduced inequality, environmental sustainability, focus on human potential and purpose.13	Complexity of transition, overcoming vested interests, developing new governance mechanisms, societal acceptance of radical change.

7. Navigating the Great Transition: Strategic Imperatives for an AI-Shaped Future

The transition to an AI-shaped future, characterized by evolved human purpose and transformed work, requires deliberate and coordinated strategies across policy, education, and societal adaptation. These imperatives are crucial for harnessing AI’s benefits while mitigating its risks and ensuring a human-centered trajectory.

Policy and Governance:

Effective governance is paramount in navigating the complexities of AI. This involves establishing robust ethical frameworks to guide the development and deployment of AI systems. Key principles underpinning such frameworks include transparency, fairness, the protection of human rights and dignity, safety and security, accountability, and ensuring meaningful human oversight.1 UNESCO’s “Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence” offers a valuable global standard, emphasizing these principles and providing actionable policy areas.19 Specific recommendations from bodies like the World Economic Forum include the need to inform users about the probabilistic and stochastic nature of generative AI, ensure traceability of AI-generated content, and clearly disclose when humans are interacting with machines rather than other humans.38

Labor market policies must be proactive in addressing the disruptions caused by AI. This includes significant investment in reskilling and upskilling programs to equip the workforce for new and evolving job roles.7 Social safety nets need to be strengthened to support individuals during transitions, with ongoing debate about the potential role of UBI in providing a foundational income floor.37 Some analyses also suggest considering the taxation of automation as an intervention to manage the pace of transition and fund adjustment measures.39

To foster innovation while ensuring safety, governments and regulatory bodies should consider creating “sandbox” environments where AI technologies can be developed and tested under controlled conditions.38 Promoting the responsible sharing of resources, such as anonymized data and pre-trained models, can democratize AI development, while establishing independent auditing and certification mechanisms for AI models can build trust and ensure adherence to safety and ethical standards.38 A regulatory approach that focuses on broad objectives and desired outcomes, rather than attempting to regulate specific algorithms which rapidly become outdated, is likely to be more effective and adaptable.33

Effective AI governance cannot be achieved in isolation. Given AI’s pervasive impact across sectors and national borders 40, a multi-stakeholder approach involving governments, industry, academia, civil society, and the public is essential.19 No single entity possesses all the necessary knowledge or legitimacy to govern AI effectively. Furthermore, because AI technology is evolving at an unprecedented pace, governance frameworks must be adaptive and flexible, capable of responding to new developments and unforeseen challenges.1 This calls for mechanisms like ongoing review processes for AI models, akin to those in clinical trials or manufacturing, and the ability to adjust regulations as understanding deepens. Finally, the global nature of AI necessitates international cooperation to harmonize standards, share best practices, address cross-border ethical and legal issues, and prevent a “race to the bottom” in safety or ethical considerations.19 A globally coordinated, collaborative, and adaptive governance ecosystem is paramount for maximizing AI’s benefits while responsibly managing its risks.

Educational Transformation:

Education systems worldwide face a critical mandate to prepare individuals for a future profoundly shaped by AI. This requires a fundamental shift in pedagogical approaches and curriculum content. The primary focus must move beyond rote memorization and the transmission of factual knowledge (much of which AI can access and process more efficiently) towards cultivating uniquely human, future-ready skills. These include critical thinking, creative problem-solving, ethical reasoning, emotional intelligence, adaptability, systems thinking, and effective communication.16

The rapid evolution of AI means that specific technical skills can quickly become outdated.1 While a foundational AI literacy—understanding what AI is, its capabilities, limitations, and societal implications—will be necessary for many roles 23, the more enduring educational imperative is to develop these core human cognitive and ethical capacities. These capacities provide the bedrock for lifelong learning, critical engagement with technology, and adaptation in a constantly changing technological landscape. This implies a pedagogical shift towards inquiry-based learning, project-based assignments that foster collaboration and real-world problem-solving, and teaching methodologies that cultivate “wonder” and encourage students to use AI creatively and strategically, rather than passively.42

Lifelong learning ecosystems will become essential, as continuous adaptation and skill refreshment will be the norm.44 AI itself can play a role here, acting as a personalized “learning concierge,” adapting educational content and pacing to individual learner needs and goals.43 Higher education institutions have a crucial role in generating specialized AI talent, conducting cutting-edge research to inform policy and innovation, and ensuring that professionals across all fields acquire relevant AI competencies.40

Crucially, educational transformation must involve a deeper integration of ethics and the humanities across all disciplines.20 Students need to learn not only how to use AI but also how to work with it, critically question its outputs and biases, understand the ethical implications of its use, and even participate in training and refining AI systems responsibly.43 The role of educators will evolve from being primary dispensers of information to becoming facilitators of these complex skills, mentors guiding students through AI-augmented learning experiences, and designers of rich, engaging educational environments.43 Curricula need a fundamental redesign to emphasize “how to think” rather than merely “what to know,” embedding ethical and humanistic perspectives as core components, not peripheral afterthoughts.

Table 3: Core Human Competencies for the AI Era and Educational Implications

 

Competency	Description in AI Context	Why It’s Crucial (Complements AI)	Educational Focus/Reform Needed
Critical & Systems Thinking	Ability to analyze complex situations, evaluate information (including AI outputs) discerningly, understand interconnections.	AI provides data/analysis; humans provide judgment, contextual understanding, identify biases, see the bigger picture.16	Inquiry-based learning, Socratic methods, analysis of complex case studies, multidisciplinary projects, teaching logic and epistemology.42
Creative Problem Solving & Innovation	Generating novel ideas, solutions, and approaches; synthesizing information in original ways.	AI can assist in ideation/prototyping; humans drive true originality, intuition, and paradigm-shifting innovation.16	Project-based learning, design thinking, arts integration, fostering curiosity and “pedagogy of wonder,” encouraging experimentation and risk-taking.43
Emotional & Social Intelligence (EQ)	Understanding and managing one’s own and others’ emotions; empathy, collaboration, communication.	AI lacks genuine empathy/interpersonal nuance; EQ is vital for human-AI teams, leadership, and human-centric services.16	Collaborative projects, role-playing, literature and humanities studies, mindfulness practices, direct instruction in communication and conflict resolution.16
Ethical Reasoning & AI Governance Literacy	Understanding and applying ethical principles to AI development/use; awareness of societal impacts and governance needs.	AI operates algorithmically; humans must ensure ethical alignment, fairness, accountability, and responsible deployment.19	Integration of ethics across curriculum (not standalone), case studies on AI ethics, debates, understanding AI bias, data privacy, and policy implications.20
Adaptability & Learning Agility	Capacity to learn new skills quickly, embrace change, and thrive in uncertain environments.	AI evolves rapidly; humans need to continuously learn and adapt to new tools, roles, and challenges.16	Personalized learning paths (AI-assisted), fostering growth mindsets, exposure to diverse experiences, metacognitive skill development (learning how to learn).43
Cross-Cultural Collaboration & Communication	Ability to work effectively and communicate clearly with diverse individuals and teams, often mediated by technology.	AI facilitates global connection; humans must navigate cultural differences and build trust for effective collaboration.	International exchange programs (virtual/physical), diverse team projects, language learning, intercultural communication studies, emphasis on active listening and clear articulation.16

Societal Adaptation:

Beyond formal policy and education, broader societal adaptations will be necessary to navigate the AI transition successfully. A key challenge is addressing technological exclusion, particularly for individuals with lower digital competencies or those from older generations who may find it harder to adapt.47 Ensuring equitable access to the benefits of AI advancements and the opportunities they create is crucial for social cohesion.40

Managing the psychological and cultural shifts accompanying widespread AI adoption requires proactive effort. Transparent communication from organizations and governments about the goals and impacts of AI implementation can help alleviate fears of mass layoffs and build trust.47 Support systems for mental well-being will be increasingly important as individuals cope with the stresses of change and the redefinition of work and purpose.4 Culturally, there may need to be a shift towards valuing a broader range of human contributions and activities beyond traditional paid employment, recognizing the worth of community engagement, caregiving, artistic pursuits, and lifelong learning.

Societal interventions, as analyzed by frameworks like Bernardi et al.’s, include steering AI development towards capabilities that complement rather than merely replace human skills, potentially implementing “human-in-the-loop” requirements for critical systems to ensure human oversight, and developing both material (like UBI or social services) and social substitutes for work that provide income, structure, and a sense of purpose.39 Early preparation through mechanisms like “if-then commitments” (pre-agreed policy responses to specific AI development triggers) and the crafting of flexible, accurate regulation that avoids misspecification are vital for successful long-term adaptation.39 A holistic approach, coordinating interventions across the AI lifecycle and addressing both the material and non-material aspects of work’s role in human life, will be essential.

8. Conclusion: Charting a Course Towards a Purposeful, Prosperous, and Human-Centered Future

The era of advanced Artificial Intelligence and abundant knowledge presents humanity with a defining challenge and an extraordinary opportunity. The preceding analysis has explored the multifaceted dimensions of this transformation, addressing what human purpose and work must evolve into, why this evolution is imperative for a “better life” and sustainable prosperity, and how this profound transition might be navigated.

Recap of the “What, Why, and How” of Human Evolution in the AI Era:

Human purpose, in an age where AI can perform many cognitive and productive tasks, is poised to evolve towards more intrinsic motivations: the pursuit of creativity, the deepening of human connection and empathy, the quest for knowledge and understanding, and the critical role of ethical stewardship over powerful new technologies. Work, diverging from today’s often task-based and routine-driven structures, will increasingly become a domain of human-AI collaboration. Humans will shift towards strategic oversight, innovation, complex problem-framing, and the creation of value that is uniquely human-centric—value rooted in ingenuity, emotional intelligence, and ethical judgment.

This evolution is not merely a desirable outcome but a critical necessity. It is driven by the dual forces of AI’s potential to automate existing roles, thereby challenging traditional livelihoods, and its capacity to augment human capabilities, opening new frontiers for achievement and well-being. The pursuit of a “better life” in this context transcends mere economic output, encompassing holistic well-being, societal flourishing, and a sustainable relationship with our planet. While the ambition of 10% annual global GDP growth fueled by AI faces significant feasibility and sustainability hurdles within current paradigms, the underlying aspiration for progress can be channeled towards qualitative improvements in human lives and a more equitable distribution of AI-generated benefits.

Achieving this transformation requires a concerted and integrated set of strategies. Policy and governance frameworks must ensure that AI is developed and deployed ethically and responsibly, balancing innovation with safety and human rights. Educational systems must undergo a profound metamorphosis, shifting focus from rote learning to the cultivation of enduring human competencies—critical thinking, creativity, emotional intelligence, and ethical literacy—that will enable individuals to thrive alongside AI. Societal adaptation involves building resilience, fostering inclusivity, managing the psychological impacts of rapid change, and potentially reimagining economic structures to ensure that the fruits of AI-driven productivity are shared broadly.

The Agency of Choice: AI as a Tool, Humanity as the Architect:

It is crucial to underscore that the future trajectory of AI’s impact is not technologically predetermined. AI, for all its power, remains a tool—an extension of human ingenuity.11 Its ultimate influence on society, on work, and on human purpose will be shaped by the choices humanity makes, the values we embed in its design and governance, and the societal structures we create to integrate it.4 We are not passive observers of this technological unfolding; we are its architects and stewards. This confers upon us a profound responsibility to guide AI’s development and application in ways that align with our deepest aspirations for a flourishing future.

A Call for Visionary Leadership and Collaborative Action:

Navigating this great transition successfully demands visionary leadership from governments, businesses, educational institutions, and civil society organizations. It calls for proactive, forward-thinking strategies that anticipate challenges and seize opportunities, rather than reacting to disruptions after they occur. Furthermore, the complexity and pervasiveness of AI’s impact necessitate unprecedented levels of collaboration—across disciplines, such as the vital partnership between the humanities and engineering to shape AI humanistically 20; across sectors, to ensure that innovation is coupled with ethical consideration and societal benefit; and across nations, to address the global nature of AI’s reach and implications.

The path ahead is undoubtedly complex and fraught with challenges. Yet, it is also imbued with immense potential. By embracing the imperative to evolve, by making conscious and value-guided choices, and by fostering a spirit of collaborative innovation, humanity can harness the power of AI not to diminish, but to amplify human potential, redefine human endeavor, and chart a course towards a more purposeful, prosperous, equitable, and truly human-centered future.

Works cited

1. AI in the workplace: A report for 2025 | McKinsey, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/superagency-in-the-workplace-empowering-people-to-unlock-ais-full-potential-at-work
2. Generative AI in Knowledge Work: Design Implications for Data Navigation and Decision-Making – arXiv, accessed May 9, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.18419v1
3. AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6
4. Report: Technology experts worry about the future of being human …, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.elon.edu/u/news/2025/04/02/report-technology-experts-worry-about-the-future-of-being-human-in-the-ai-age/
5. AI as a Collaborative Partner: Redefining Roles in the Workplace : Articles | The Learning Guild, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.learningguild.com/articles/ai-as-a-collaborative-partner-redefining-roles-in-the-workplace/
6. Bye-Bye 9-to-5: How AI is Redefining Work as We Know It!, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.labellerr.com/blog/how-ai-is-redefining-work-as-we-know-it/
7. (PDF) The Impact of AI on Knowledge Work: A Framework for Assessing and Mitigating Job Displacement – ResearchGate, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385886808_The_Impact_of_AI_on_Knowledge_Work_A_Framework_for_Assessing_and_Mitigating_Job_Displacement
8. Exploring the Future of Work: Insights from Deloitte, McKinsey, World Economic Forum, accessed May 9, 2025, https://calcorporatehousing.com/global-mobility/future-of-work-insights-deloitte-mckinsey-world-economic-forum/
9. Why AI Is A Philosophical Rupture – Noema Magazine, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.noemamag.com/why-ai-is-a-philosophical-rupture/
10. 9 Benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in 2025 – University of Cincinnati Online, accessed May 9, 2025, https://online.uc.edu/blog/artificial-intelligence-ai-benefits/
11. Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Intelligence: A Philosophical …, accessed May 9, 2025, https://library.acropolis.org/artificial-intelligence-vs-human-intelligence-a-philosophical-perspective/
12. What If In The Future Of Work We No Longer Needed To Work? – Allwork.Space, accessed May 9, 2025, https://allwork.space/2025/03/what-if-in-the-future-of-work-we-no-longer-needed-to-work/
13. Beyond Capitalism: Designing a New Economic System for Humanity. – PhilArchive, accessed May 9, 2025, https://philarchive.org/rec/MALBCD-2
14. Social Purpose Markets: A Bold Solution for the AI-Driven Job Crisis – VKTR.com, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.vktr.com/ai-ethics-law-risk/social-purpose-markets-a-bold-solution-for-the-ai-driven-job-crisis/
15. Post-labor economics: Will capitalism work when the robots take over? – New Atlas, accessed May 9, 2025, https://newatlas.com/technology/post-labor-economics-shapiro/
16. Six Essential Human Skills for Success in the AI Era – Speakers Spotlight, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.speakers.ca/2025/03/what-are-the-essential-human-skills-in-the-age-of-ai/
17. 5 Future-Proof Skills for the AI Era | Goodwin University, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.goodwin.edu/enews/future-proof-skills-for-ai-era/
18. Sociological Perspective on the Future of AI in Health: Trends and Prospects – IGI Global, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/sociological-perspective-on-the-future-of-ai-in-health/357094
19. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence | UNESCO, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
20. Why the Humanities must shape the future of AI – Edinburgh Impact, accessed May 9, 2025, https://impact.ed.ac.uk/opinion/why-the-humanities-must-shape-the-future-of-ai/
21. (PDF) In Praise of Normative Science: Arts and Humanities in the Age of Artificial Intelligence – ResearchGate, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388029939_IN_PRAISE_OF_NORMATIVE_SCIENCE_ARTS_AND_HUMANITIES_IN_THE_AGE_OF_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE
22. 25 Ways AI Will Change the Future of Work – Workday Blog, accessed May 9, 2025, https://blog.workday.com/en-us/25-ways-ai-will-change-the-future-of-work.html
23. Boosting Productivity and Business Growth: The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Skills, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.businessatoecd.org/hubfs/website/documents/pdf/Education/Boosting%20Productivity%20and%20Business%20Growth%20The%20Role%20of%20AI%20Skills.pdf?hsLang=en
24. www.nber.org, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w25682/w25682.pdf
25. [1807.02416] A multidisciplinary task-based perspective for evaluating the impact of AI autonomy and generality on the future of work – ar5iv, accessed May 9, 2025, https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1807.02416
26. The Future Is Human First: How AI Powers The Hybrid Workplace – Lumen Blog, accessed May 9, 2025, https://blog.lumen.com/the-future-is-human-first-how-ai-powers-the-hybrid-workplace/
27. www.psychologytoday.com, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mental-wealth/202405/how-ai-affects-mental-health-in-the-workplace#:~:text=Employees%20can%20experience%20negative%20psychological,muscle%20pain%2C%20and%20sleep%20problems.
28. Examining the Double-Edged Sword Effect of AI Usage on Work …, accessed May 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11852299/
29. Artificial intelligence is impacting the field – American Psychological Association, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.apa.org/monitor/2025/01/trends-harnessing-power-of-artificial-intelligence
30. Beyond GDP: Integrating New Approaches in Global Frameworks – SDG Knowledge Hub, accessed May 9, 2025, https://sdg.iisd.org/news/beyond-gdp-integrating-new-approaches-in-global-frameworks/
31. Beyond GDP: Classifying Alternative Measures for Progress | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251414980_Beyond_GDP_Classifying_Alternative_Measures_for_Progress
32. AI adoption could boost global GDP by an additional 15 percentage points by 2035, as global economy is reshaped: PwC Research, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2025/ai-adoption-could-boost-global-gdp-by-an-additional-15-percentage.html
33. How artificial intelligence is transforming the world – Brookings Institution, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-world/
34. The global economy will be $16 trillion bigger by 2030 thanks to AI | World Economic Forum, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2017/06/the-global-economy-will-be-14-bigger-in-2030-because-of-ai/
35. A new look at the economics of AI | MIT Sloan, accessed May 9, 2025, https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/a-new-look-economics-ai
36. AI, universal basic income, and power: symbolic violence in the tech elite’s narrative – PMC, accessed May 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11891208/
37. A Policy Analysis Of Universal Basic Income In The Context Of Automation And Ai – RJPN, accessed May 9, 2025, https://rjpn.org/ijcspub/papers/IJCSP11A1018.pdf
38. The Presidio Recommendations on Responsible Generative AI – World Economic Forum, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Presidio_Recommendations_on_Responsible_Generative_AI_2023.pdf
39. Societal Adaptation to AI Human-Labor Automation – arXiv, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2501.03092
40. Shaping the future: Higher education’s impact on national AI policies – Iesalc-Unesco, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/articles/shaping-future-higher-educations-impact-national-ai-policies
41. Future of work | OECD, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/future-of-work.html
42. Educational Reforms in the AI Age: Cultivating Analytical and Ethical Reasoning Skills, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384632121_Educational_Reforms_in_the_AI_Age_Cultivating_Analytical_and_Ethical_Reasoning_Skills
43. The Future of Education in the Age of AI – the Learning Counsel, accessed May 9, 2025, https://thelearningcounsel.com/articles/the-future-of-education-in-the-age-of-ai/
44. Work and progress – OECD, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/trends-shaping-education-2025_ee6587fd-en/full-report/work-and-progress_423e3500.html
45. Embracing AI in Education Can Move Us Toward a New Era of Learning, accessed May 9, 2025, https://crpe.org/embracing-ai-in-education-can-move-us-toward-a-new-era-of-learning/
46. AI and Creativity: A Pedagogy of Wonder – AACSB, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.aacsb.edu/insights/articles/2025/02/ai-and-creativity-a-pedagogy-of-wonder
47. How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming The Job Market: A Guide To Adaptation And Career Transformation – Forbes, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/01/10/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-job-market-a-guide-to-adaptation-and-career-transformation/