The Electric Shift: Navigating ASEAN’s Two-Wheeler Transition to E-Bikes and Cargo E-Trailers

Co-created by the Catalyzer Think Tank divergent thinking and Gemini Deep Research tool.

Executive Summary

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) stands at a pivotal juncture in urban and commercial mobility. Its deeply entrenched two-wheeler culture, dominated by millions of petrol-fueled scooters and motorcycles, is the lifeblood of daily personal transport and a critical engine for the region’s burgeoning informal economy. This report examines the multifaceted factors that will determine the “what, why, and how” of ASEAN riders transitioning to electric bicycles (e-bikes) and electric cargo trailers (e-trailers) for both personal and business use.

The current ASEAN two-wheeler market is one of the world’s largest, characterized by a preference for affordable, fuel-efficient scooters and underbones, primarily used for daily commuting and a wide array of business applications, from ride-hailing to last-mile delivery. Japanese brands have long held sway, building extensive networks and strong consumer loyalty. However, the electric vehicle (EV) segment, though still nascent in most member states, is showing robust growth, driven by local and Chinese manufacturers.

The primary drivers for a potential shift to e-mobility are compelling. Economically, e-bikes and e-scooters promise significantly lower total costs of ownership (TCO) through reduced fuel and maintenance expenditures. For businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and logistics operators, electric cargo solutions offer enhanced operational efficiency, increased load capacity, and access to restricted urban zones. Environmental concerns, coupled with the technological appeal of smart features and the convenience of electric power, also contribute to the growing interest.

However, formidable barriers impede widespread adoption. High upfront costs remain the most significant deterrent, particularly for the price-sensitive mass market and SMEs. Inadequate public charging infrastructure, nascent battery-swapping networks facing standardization hurdles, and a shortage of skilled maintenance technicians create practical concerns regarding range, reliability, and long-term serviceability. Furthermore, the durability of e-bikes and their batteries in ASEAN’s demanding climatic and road conditions is a key consideration. Regulatory frameworks for e-bikes, and especially for novel solutions like cargo e-trailers, are often inconsistent or underdeveloped across the region, creating market uncertainty. Socio-cultural factors, including ingrained habits, perceptions of quality and safety, and the existing social status associated with petrol motorcycles, also play a crucial role.

Accelerating this transition requires a multi-pronged strategic approach. Governments must craft enabling policies, including sustained financial incentives, clear and harmonized vehicle standards (particularly for cargo solutions), and regulations for safe road use. Significant public and private investment is needed to build out charging and battery-swapping infrastructure, alongside robust maintenance and battery recycling ecosystems. Industry innovation in developing “ASEAN-proof” vehicles suited to local conditions, coupled with accessible financing models like Battery-as-a-Service (BaaS) and microfinance, will be vital. Finally, cultivating rider awareness through education, training, pilot programs, and showcasing success stories is essential to bridge the perception gap and build consumer confidence.

The shift towards electrified two-wheeler mobility in ASEAN is not merely a technological substitution but a fundamental transformation of urban and commercial transport ecosystems. Success hinges on a collaborative effort to develop holistic, localized solutions that address the unique economic, infrastructural, and cultural landscape of the region, ultimately paving the way for cleaner, more efficient, and versatile transportation.

I. The Prevailing Two-Wheeler Culture in ASEAN: Context for Change

The prospect of transitioning ASEAN’s scooter and motorcycle riders to electric alternatives must be understood within the context of the region’s deeply ingrained two-wheeler culture. These vehicles are not mere conveyances but integral components of the socio-economic fabric, dictating a unique set of expectations and challenges for any proposed shift.

A. Dominance and Diversity: The Current Scooter and Motorcycle Market

The ASEAN region is a global heavyweight in the motorcycle market, ranking third in production and sales units after India and China.1 Before the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2019, the total number of registered motorcycles was staggering: 106 million in Indonesia, 62 million in Vietnam, and 21 million in Thailand.1 Across all ASEAN nations, the consolidated data showed over 240 million motorized two-wheelers at the beginning of the current decade.3 Sales figures further underscore this dominance; the “ASEAN Seven” nations (Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Singapore) saw annual sales peak at nearly 15 million units in 2019, representing 22.1% of global two-wheeler sales.4 Even with a pandemic-induced decline to 10.9 million vehicles in 2020, the region still accounted for 18.1% of worldwide two-wheeler sales.4 Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand consistently emerge as the top sellers.2 The Vietnamese market, for instance, showed signs of recovery with sales up 4.9% in 2024 to 2.9 million units, and a strong start to 2025 with Q1 sales reaching 708,949 units, a 7.9% increase.5 This massive, established market presents both a substantial opportunity for electrification and a formidable challenge due to inherent market inertia.

The types of two-wheelers prevalent in ASEAN reflect a strong preference for practicality and efficiency.

• Scooters are particularly dominant, especially in Indonesia where they constitute the vast majority of domestic sales.6 Across the “ASEAN Four” market leaders (Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam), scooters accounted for 60.1% of the fleet in 2019 and 62% in 2020.4 Their popularity stems from fuel efficiency, low maintenance requirements, and simplicity of use, making them a preferred choice for daily commuting.6
• Underbones, also known as cubs or mopeds, are another highly popular category across Southeast Asia 8, particularly in Thailand where they held a 48.4% market share in 2020.4 These vehicles are prized for their practicality and are often manual or semi-automatic.8
• Standard motorcycles (or street bikes) have a lower overall market share in the ASEAN Four, around 12.3% in 2020, but are significant in certain segments or countries, such as the Philippines.4 Engine displacements are predominantly small, typically ranging from 50cc to 250cc.7 The 100cc to 125cc bracket was the most popular across the ASEAN Four, accounting for 62.9% of the market in 2020.4 These smaller engines contribute to the affordability and high fuel efficiency (often over 50 kilometers per litre) that ASEAN riders value.10 Understanding these preferences is critical for designing electric alternatives that can genuinely compete.

Market dynamics show a strong post-pandemic recovery in sales in some areas like Vietnam.5 However, the industry overall has been described as struggling with dynamic changes.5 Japanese manufacturers, notably Honda and Yamaha, have historically dominated, commanding over 80-95% market share in key countries like Indonesia.2 Their success is built on robust local production capabilities, extensive distribution and service networks, and deeply entrenched consumer trust.6 This established brand loyalty presents a significant hurdle for new entrants. While the development of the new energy segment is supported by strong investments from local manufacturers (like Vinfast in Vietnam) and large Chinese companies (like Yadea, Dibao) 2, they face a mature market and highly selective customer demand that favors established players, particularly Honda.5

The deep-rooted dominance of established Japanese internal combustion engine (ICE) manufacturers, such as Honda and Yamaha, presents a formidable barrier to widespread electrification in the ASEAN two-wheeler market. These brands have cultivated an overwhelming market share over decades 2, underpinned by strong local production facilities, expansive and reliable distribution and after-sales service networks, and a profound level of consumer trust built through years of consistent performance.6 New entrants in the electric vehicle (EV) space, often local startups or Chinese firms, encounter what is described as “very selective customer demand, with high loyalty towards established companies, Honda overall”.5 Compounding this challenge is the relatively slow pace at which these Japanese giants are transitioning their core product offerings in the ASEAN market to electric alternatives.2 This inertia means that overcoming the entrenched loyalty and the comprehensive ecosystem built by ICE incumbents requires more than just achieving technological or price parity for EVs; it necessitates the arduous task of building comparable levels of trust, service infrastructure, and brand recognition from the ground up.

Furthermore, the prevailing culture surrounding motorcycle use in ASEAN dictates that practicality and necessity far outweigh novelty or purely aspirational appeal. In stark contrast to Western markets where motorcycles might be seen as symbols of freedom or recreational toys, in Southeast Asia, they are indispensable “workhorses,” “necessities,” and “lifelines” integral to daily existence.10 They are fundamental tools for commuting, supporting livelihoods, transporting families, and hauling a myriad of goods.3 Affordability is paramount, with many models costing less than a new smartphone, and efficiency, often exceeding 50 kilometers per liter of fuel, is a critical consideration for a cost-conscious populace.10 This deeply utilitarian perspective means that any proposed shift towards e-bikes or e-trailers must offer demonstrably superior, or at the very least equivalent, practicality, reliability, and economic benefit. The mere allure of new technology or environmental advantages, while acknowledged, may not be sufficient drivers for mass-market adoption if these core functional and economic needs are not met or exceeded. The sustained success of models like the Honda Activa, known for its reliability and economy 11, underscores this ingrained preference for dependable, economical workhorses, setting a high bar for electric alternatives.

B. The ASEAN Rider: Demographics, Usage Patterns, and Motivations

The typical ASEAN two-wheeler rider profile is diverse yet shares common characteristics driven by economic realities and urban landscapes. A significant portion of riders comes from lower to middle-income populations 1, making affordability a key determinant in vehicle choice. Youth are also prominent users, particularly in countries like Malaysia for motorcycles 6 and are noted as a target demographic for electric scooter adoption in Indonesia and Malaysia.13 Families, too, rely heavily on two-wheelers for daily transportation needs, including carrying children and goods.3

The primary uses of motorcycles and scooters in ASEAN are extensive and varied:

• Personal Transport: Daily commuting in congested urban environments is a fundamental driver of two-wheeler ownership.1 The agility of these vehicles allows riders to navigate through dense traffic and narrow alleys far more efficiently than cars 1, a crucial advantage in cities like Jakarta, Hanoi, Manila, and Bangkok.3
• Business Applications: Two-wheelers are indispensable for countless livelihoods 10 and form the backbone of the informal transport sector.15 This includes the booming ride-hailing services (e.g., Go-Jek in Indonesia with over 400,000 drivers 16, and traditional “ojeks” 6) and delivery services, which have seen a surge with the growth of e-commerce and food delivery platforms.16 Motorcycles are effectively mobile job sites for many.10

The motivations underpinning the current widespread use of ICE two-wheelers are clear:

• Affordability: Motorcycles are significantly cheaper to purchase than cars.1
• Fuel Efficiency: Low fuel consumption makes them economical to run.6
• Low Maintenance Costs: Generally, they require less maintenance compared to cars.6
• Congestion Navigation: Their ability to weave through traffic is a major practical advantage.1
• Necessity: For many, they are not a choice but a fundamental requirement for daily life and work.10

However, this reliance on two-wheelers comes with a significant downside: safety. The rate of road fatalities involving two and three-wheeler riders in Southeast Asia is alarmingly high, accounting for 62% of all road deaths in the region. In some countries like Thailand and Indonesia, this figure can surge to as high as 74%.19 While not a direct impetus for switching to electric models, this safety crisis could make riders more receptive to vehicles perceived as safer, or prompt governments to promote alternatives that incorporate enhanced safety features like Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS), although ABS is not exclusive to electric vehicles.19 The anecdotal evidence of frequent funerals for young motorcycle accident victims further underscores this grave concern.20

The integral role of motorcycles in the ASEAN economy, particularly within the informal sector, positions business use as a critical lever for electrification. These vehicles are not merely for personal travel; they “power…livelihoods, and entire economies” 10 and are a “critical component of the informal transport sector”.15 The explosive growth of ride-hailing services, exemplified by Go-Jek’s expansion in Indonesia 16, and the e-commerce boom fueling extensive delivery networks 16, are heavily dependent on the efficiency and ubiquity of two-wheelers. Users in these business segments are acutely sensitive to operational expenditures, particularly fuel and maintenance costs.12 Consequently, if e-bikes and e-trailers can demonstrate a clear Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) advantage 22, their adoption within this high-utilization segment could be swift and substantial. Business applications often entail high daily mileage, which would amplify the benefits of lower electricity costs compared to petrol and shorten the payback period for the typically higher upfront investment required for EVs. Therefore, strategically targeting the business segment first could establish a significant beachhead market for electric two-wheelers, driving economies of scale, stimulating the development of essential support infrastructure (such as battery-swapping stations crucial for high-uptime operations 15), and enhancing broader public visibility and acceptance of e-mobility.

There is also a clear, albeit often informally addressed, latent demand for enhanced cargo capacity among ASEAN two-wheeler riders. Current motorcycles are already extensively utilized to “haul shopping purchases, family members and much more” 3, frequently through improvised methods or by exceeding the vehicle’s intended load limits. The rapid expansion of e-commerce and associated delivery services inherently translates to an increased demand for efficient goods transportation.16 The industry’s response, such as the development of specific business-use scooter designs featuring “more storage space” 16, signals an existing need that standard models do not adequately fulfill. This suggests that dedicated cargo e-trailers or purpose-built cargo e-bikes, provided they are appropriately designed for the challenging ASEAN urban environments (prioritizing maneuverability and durability) and are competitively priced, could tap into a substantial unmet or poorly met demand. Such solutions would cater to both personal uses, like transporting groceries or facilitating family travel, and a wide range of business applications, including deliveries and mobile vending operations.

II. The Electric Proposition: E-Bikes and Cargo E-Trailers for ASEAN

As ASEAN grapples with urban congestion, air quality concerns, and the economic realities of its populace, electric mobility solutions, specifically e-bikes and cargo e-trailers, present a compelling alternative to the dominant ICE two-wheelers. Understanding their current market status, suitable models, and potential for expanding utility is crucial for charting a path towards wider adoption.

A. E-Bikes in ASEAN: Market Status, Suitable Models, and Growth Trajectory

The penetration of electric two-wheelers (e-bikes and e-motorcycles) in ASEAN is still in its early stages but shows significant promise. In most member states, such as Indonesia, electric models accounted for less than 1% of the market in 2023, though this segment is experiencing rapid growth.2 Vietnam stands out with a higher adoption rate, where electric motorcycles constitute about 10% of the total motorcycle fleet 2, and electric two-wheelers (E2Ws) captured approximately 8.5% of the 2W market in 2020.4 The overall market share of E2Ws in the ASEAN Four (Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam) increased from 1.7% in 2019 to 3.2% in 2020, a 95.3% rise.4 This nascent status, juxtaposed with rapid growth spurts, indicates a market ripe with potential if key barriers are addressed.

Growth projections for the ASEAN electric two-wheeler market are robust. One valuation placed the market at USD 954.65 million in 2023, with an anticipated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.09%.23 Another forecast sees the ASEAN e-bike market (potentially with a narrower definition) growing from USD 51.79 million in 2024 to USD 108.63 million by 2032, at a CAGR of 9.70%.24 A third projection estimates the market expanding from USD 67.77 billion in 2025 to USD 157.23 billion by 2034, with a CAGR of 9.80%.17 These varying figures likely stem from different definitions of “e-bike” (often pedal-assisted or low power) versus the broader “electric two-wheeler” category which includes electric motorcycles and scooters. Regardless of the precise valuation, the consistent forecast of strong growth signals increasing market readiness. Annual sales in Southeast Asian countries are expected to reach a combined three to four million units by 2030.25

The types of e-bikes gaining traction in ASEAN align with the region’s preference for practical urban mobility:

• Pedal-Assisted E-Bikes: Currently hold the largest market share in the ASEAN e-bike market, favored for their efficiency and regulatory advantages, often offering a riding experience similar to conventional bicycles but with assistance.24
• Throttle-Controlled E-Bikes: Also present in the market, providing full electric power without the need for pedaling.24
• Speed Pedelecs: A smaller segment, typically offering higher speeds with pedal assistance.24
• Low-power E-Motorcycles/Scooters: Corresponding to the L1 category (equivalent to engines below 50cc), these are showing strong growth, as seen in Vietnam with a 65.5% increase in early 2025.5 They often require no special license and are well-suited for urban commutes.
• Foldable E-Bikes: Demand is increasing for these models, particularly among urban commuters and those using multi-modal transport, due to their portability and space-saving design.24

Battery technology and power output are critical aspects of e-bike suitability:

• Lithium-Ion Batteries: Dominate the market due to their superior performance characteristics, including longer lifespan, higher energy density, and faster charging times.24 These features are particularly crucial for high-utilization applications like delivery services.24
• Lead-Acid Batteries: While heavier and less energy-dense, lead-acid batteries are still used, particularly in lower-cost models or specific markets. In 2020, they constituted 67.8% of E2Ws sold in the ASEAN Four.4 They are noted for being more robust in rugged operating conditions, including high temperatures and humidity.26
• Battery Swapping: This is an area of growing interest and investment, aimed at addressing charging limitations and reducing downtime, especially for commercial users.15 Indonesia, for example, has ambitious targets for deploying battery swapping stations (SPBKLU).27
• Power Output: The segment with power output less than 250W holds a significant share, largely due to the affordability, lightweight structure, and suitability of these e-bikes for urban commuting.24

The competitive landscape for e-bikes and e-motorcycles in ASEAN is dynamic:

• Local and Regional Players: Companies like VinFast (Vietnam) 2, Gesits (Indonesia) 2, Pega (Vietnam) 2, SWAP (Indonesia) 2, Viar (Indonesia) 2, Eclimo (Malaysia) 31, and Polygon Bikes (Indonesia) 31 are making significant inroads. VinFast and Gesits were E2W market leaders in their respective countries in 2020.4
• Chinese Brands: Manufacturers such as Yadea 2, Niu Technologies 30, and Dibao 5 are aggressively expanding and gaining considerable market share.25
• Japanese Incumbents: Traditional giants like Honda (launching models such as Activa e:, QC1 in India, and CUV e:, ICON e: in Indonesia/Vietnam) 11 and Yamaha (with models like the E01 scooter) 26 are entering the EV space, though their transition in ASEAN has generally been slower compared to new entrants.2
• Other International Brands: Well-known bicycle manufacturers like Trek, Giant, Merida, and Accell Group are also present in the ASEAN e-bike market.24 This diverse and competitive environment suggests a vibrant future, though the dominance of established ICE brands remains a challenge for newer EV-focused companies.

A critical observation is the potential mismatch between the types of e-bikes often promoted and the ingrained preferences of traditional ASEAN two-wheeler riders. The regional market heavily favors scooters and underbones due to their inherent practicality, step-through design, and ease of use in daily life.4 Many of the “e-bikes” currently gaining traction, particularly those emphasized in broader global discussions, are pedal-assisted bicycles.24 While these are valuable for certain segments and offer a distinct mode of transport, they represent a different vehicle category and user experience compared to the motorized scooters and underbones that millions of ASEAN citizens rely on daily. Although electric scooters and motorcycles are available (e.g., VinFast Klara 30, Honda ICON e: 11), a generalized “e-bike” push might not directly resonate with a rider looking to replace their 125cc petrol scooter for daily commuting and cargo hauling. The key to mass-market ICE replacement lies in offering electric equivalents to these popular ICE models in terms of form factor, perceived utility, and performance, rather than primarily focusing on bicycle-style e-bikes. The notable success of L1 category electric vehicles (equivalent to <50cc engines) in Vietnam, which saw a 65.5% growth 5, suggests a strong appetite for scooter-like EVs that are user-friendly and often fall under simpler regulatory regimes.

Battery swapping technology is emerging as a crucial “bridge technology” to accelerate EV adoption, particularly for high-utilization users, but it faces a significant looming challenge: standardization. Range anxiety and lengthy charging times are consistently cited as major barriers to EV uptake.23 Battery swapping directly mitigates these concerns by offering a “refueling” experience that takes only minutes 24, a critical factor for commercial operators like delivery riders who cannot afford significant downtime.15 Consequently, numerous companies are investing in battery swapping infrastructure 15, and governments are setting targets, such as Indonesia’s aim for 67,000 battery exchange stations (SPBKLU) by 2030.27 However, a significant restraint on the growth of the battery swapping market is the lack of uniformity and standardization in EV batteries.28 Many brands are inclined to develop their own proprietary battery ecosystems and charging protocols 22, creating “walled gardens.” This situation mirrors the “format wars” seen in other technology industries. Without interoperability, users could find themselves locked into specific swapping networks, limiting their convenience and potentially fragmenting the market. Such fragmentation could slow overall EV adoption despite the inherent advantages of the swapping model itself. The development of ASEAN-level guidelines for LEVs is a positive step 34, but achieving harmonized standards for batteries and swapping systems will be paramount for the technology to reach its full potential as an enabler of mass EV adoption.

B. Cargo E-Trailers & Electric Cargo Bikes: Expanding Utility for ASEAN Lifestyles

Beyond direct replacements for personal two-wheelers, electric cargo solutions—comprising attachable e-bike trailers and integrated electric cargo bikes—offer a significant expansion of utility that aligns well with existing ASEAN lifestyles and burgeoning business needs. These solutions provide enhanced carrying capacity, opening up new use cases for both individuals and enterprises. E-bike trailers can be attached to regular bicycles or e-bikes 37, while electric cargo bikes are purpose-built for hauling.39

The specifications of these cargo solutions are designed for functionality and robustness:

• Load Capacity: E-bike trailers can manage substantial loads. For instance, the Jacs eBike cargo trailer has a capacity of 150-200 lbs (approximately 68-90 kg) 37, while Carla Cargo e-trailers can handle up to 200 kg.38 Integrated electric cargo bikes also boast impressive payload capacities, such as the Troxus Lynx at 500 lbs (approximately 226 kg) 41 and the Tern HSD with a maximum gross vehicle weight (MGVW) of 170 kg.42
• Dimensions & Design: Platform sizes vary to accommodate different needs, with some trailers offering foldable designs for easier storage.37 Electric cargo bikes are engineered for stability when carrying heavy loads, often featuring longer wheelbases or specialized frame geometries.
• Electric Assist for Trailers: A key innovation is the inclusion of electric motors on the trailers themselves, such as the eCARLA 38 and the Convoy e-trailer.43 This feature is crucial for assisting the towing bicycle, especially when transporting heavy cargo, making the journey less strenuous for the rider.
• Durability and Roadworthiness: These cargo solutions are typically built with utility in mind, featuring robust frames, suitable tires (such as fat tires for stability and varied terrain 37), and effective braking systems to handle the increased weight.42

These features make electric cargo solutions highly suitable for the ASEAN context:

• Personal Use: They can transform daily errands, facilitating grocery shopping, transporting children safely (a common sight and need in ASEAN) 43, and enabling family outings. For many households, they could reduce the necessity for a second vehicle or even a car for numerous local trips.
• Business Use (SMEs, Logistics, Vendors): The applications for businesses are extensive. They are ideal for last-mile delivery services 17, a rapidly growing sector in ASEAN. Mobile vending, whether for food or retail goods, becomes more feasible with customizable cargo setups like mobile kitchens or market stalls.38 Repair services can efficiently transport tools and equipment to job sites.40 Even light agricultural transport for small-scale farmers moving produce to local markets is a potential application, given the general cargo hauling capabilities.41

While electric cargo bikes and trailers are gaining traction in some Western markets, their formal introduction and availability in ASEAN are relatively recent. The MYBYK Electric Cargo model launched in India in March 2023, designed to tackle last-mile delivery challenges for gig workers 24, is an example of a regional initiative. Furthermore, a UNEP-supported pilot project in the Philippines utilized electric tricycles for urban freight delivery, demonstrating the viability of small electric vehicles for logistics.46 The current limited availability of dedicated cargo e-trailers and a wide range of electric cargo bikes in many ASEAN markets suggests a significant market gap and a corresponding opportunity for manufacturers and service providers. Pilot projects are proving crucial for demonstrating their viability and adapting designs to local needs.

Cargo e-trailers, in particular, present a “modular” upgrade pathway that could significantly appeal to existing bicycle and e-bike owners in ASEAN. The region already possesses a massive fleet of traditional bicycles, alongside a growing number of e-bikes. Cargo e-trailers, such as the Convoy model which can attach to almost any bike 43, or the versatile Carla Cargo systems 38, can instantly convert these existing vehicles into cargo-capable transport. This modularity offers a substantially lower barrier to entry for achieving enhanced cargo capacity compared to the purchase of a dedicated, and often more expensive, integrated cargo e-bike. Users can leverage their current bicycles, adding cargo functionality as needed. The “click, clack and lock” ease of attachment emphasized for some models 43 is a critical factor for user adoption, as it allows for flexibility – the bike can be used solo for personal commuting or with the trailer for hauling tasks. This adaptability could be especially attractive to the price-sensitive ASEAN consumer base and small businesses that require occasional but significant cargo capability without the commitment or expense of a specialized vehicle.

However, the burgeoning potential of cargo e-trailers and other light electric cargo vehicles in ASEAN faces a significant hurdle: a regulatory blind spot. Current ASEAN guidelines and national policies for Light Electric Vehicles (LEVs) predominantly focus on two-wheelers like e-bikes and e-scooters, and sometimes three-wheelers, primarily for passenger transport.35 While “urban logistics” is acknowledged as a key use case for LEVs 35, specific regulations governing e-bike trailers – covering crucial aspects such as maximum dimensions, permissible weight limits, road access rules, specific safety standards, and insurance requirements – are largely undefined or lack harmonization across the ASEAN member states.35 Even for standard e-bikes, the development and implementation of comprehensive standards are ongoing processes.50 The addition of a trailer introduces further complexities concerning braking dynamics, vehicle stability, and interaction with other road users, which current regulatory frameworks may not adequately address. This regulatory ambiguity, noted as a general issue for e-bike adoption 24, creates considerable uncertainty for manufacturers contemplating market entry, importers assessing compliance, and potential business users evaluating the feasibility and legality of adopting cargo e-trailer solutions. For instance, New York City found it necessary to establish new, specific rules to authorize the use of e-cargo bikes, defining parameters such as width, number of wheels, speed limits, and designated loading zones.51 Similar proactive and detailed regulatory frameworks are urgently needed in ASEAN to unlock the full potential of these innovative cargo solutions.

III. Why Switch? Unpacking the Drivers for E-Mobility Adoption

The transition from conventional petrol-powered scooters and motorcycles to e-bikes and cargo e-trailers in ASEAN will be propelled by a confluence of factors. While economic benefits often take center stage, operational advantages for businesses, alongside growing environmental and social considerations, also contribute significantly to the appeal of electric mobility.

A. The Economic Equation: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Operational Savings

One of the most compelling arguments for ASEAN riders to switch to electric two-wheelers is the potential for significant long-term economic savings, primarily driven by lower operational and maintenance costs compared to their ICE counterparts.

• Lower Fuel/Electricity Costs: The expense of “fueling” an electric scooter or e-bike is substantially less than purchasing petrol. Comparative studies highlight this starkly: in India, the per-kilometer cost for an electric scooter was estimated at ₹0.232, versus ₹2.12 for a petrol scooter.12 Similarly, in Malaysia, a full charge for an electric scooter might cost less than RM2, while a petrol tank fill-up can exceed RM20.21 Broadly, electric two-wheelers are estimated to require only about one-sixth the energy cost of ICE motorcycles to cover a distance of 100km.22 Other sources confirm that electric motorcycles can save over 40% in energy costs compared to fuel motorcycles.2 For instance, e-bikes in the Philippines are estimated to cost only ₱200-₱500 per month for electricity.53 These savings are a powerful motivator, especially for high-mileage users such as delivery personnel and ride-hailing drivers, as well as for the generally price-sensitive consumer base in ASEAN.
• Reduced Maintenance Costs: Electric two-wheelers inherently have fewer moving parts than ICE vehicles (no complex engines, spark plugs, oil, or exhaust systems). This translates to less frequent maintenance needs and lower associated costs.12 Annual maintenance for electric scooters is typically much lower than for petrol versions, which require regular oil changes, air filter cleaning, and spark plug checks.12 Some estimates suggest that annual maintenance expenses for EV two-wheelers can be half those of ICE motorcycles 22, and overall usage costs can be 50% lower.2 This not only saves money but also reduces vehicle downtime, an attractive proposition for both personal and business users.
• Government Incentives: To bridge the initial price gap between EVs and ICE vehicles, many ASEAN governments, and governments globally, offer various financial incentives. These can include purchase subsidies, tax credits or exemptions (for vehicles, batteries, or import duties), grants, and reduced registration fees.12 Examples include India’s FAME-II scheme 15, Thailand’s consumer subsidies and manufacturer incentives 25, Indonesia’s tax breaks for EV manufacturers and luxury tax exemptions for BEVs 49, the Philippines’ Electric Vehicle Industry Development Act (EVIDA) offering exemptions and discounts 49, and Vietnam’s registration fee exemptions and excise tax reductions.24 These incentives are crucial for making e-mobility more financially accessible in the price-sensitive ASEAN markets.
• Long-term Value Retention: While the secondary market for EVs is still developing in ASEAN 22, there is a potential for e-motorbikes to retain value well due to their newer technology and lower wear and tear on powertrain components.54 However, this is an emerging factor, and in some current market contexts, petrol bikes may still command better resale values due to established demand and familiarity.55
• Quantified Savings: The cumulative impact of these lower costs can be substantial. Beyond the per-kilometer savings, businesses adopting e-cargo bikes report considerable overall financial benefits.40 For individual commuters, the monthly savings on fuel and maintenance can free up significant disposable income.53

The following table provides an illustrative comparison of costs:

Table 1: Comparative Cost Overview: Conventional vs. Electric Two-Wheelers in ASEAN (Illustrative)

 

Feature	Conventional ICE Scooter (110-125cc)	E-Scooter/E-Bike (Comparable Utility)	Electric Cargo Bike/Trailer Solution
Avg. Purchase Price (USD)	$1,000 – $2,000 1	$1,500 – $3,500 (pre-subsidy) 34	$2,000 – $6,000+ (bike or bike+trailer) 38
Est. Running Cost/km (USD)	$0.02 – $0.04 (petrol) 12	$0.002 – $0.005 (electricity) 12	$0.003 – $0.007 (electricity, higher for cargo)
Typical Annual Maint. (USD)	$50 – $150 12	$20 – $70 12	$30 – $100 (higher wear on some parts)
Battery Replacement (USD)	N/A	$300 – $800 (3-5 year life) 12	$400 – $1000+ (larger/multiple batteries)
Potential Gov. Subsidy (USD)	Minimal/None	$100 – $1,000+ (varies widely) 23	Variable, may be higher for commercial 56
Illustrative 5-Year TCO (USD)	$2,500 – $4,500	$2,000 – $4,000 (with subsidies)	$3,000 – $7,000+ (highly variable by use)

Note: Figures are illustrative and can vary significantly by country, specific model, usage intensity, local energy/fuel prices, and available subsidies. Sources like 12 inform these estimates.

While the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for electric two-wheelers can be advantageous, this benefit is highly susceptible to the stability of government subsidies and prevailing electricity prices. The current economic appeal of EVs often hinges on these subsidies, which help offset the higher initial purchase costs.12 Should these subsidies be reduced or entirely phased out, as has been observed with schemes like FAME II in India which subsequently pressured OEMs to drastically cut production costs 25, the TCO calculation can alter significantly, diminishing the competitiveness of EVs against their ICE counterparts. Similarly, while electricity prices are generally lower and more stable than volatile petrol prices, they are not immune to increases and can vary considerably across different regions and countries within ASEAN. Any substantial rise in electricity tariffs could erode the anticipated operational savings. Therefore, the long-term financial attractiveness of transitioning to e-mobility for the average ASEAN rider or business is intrinsically linked to sustained governmental support, or alternatively, a rapid and significant reduction in EV technology costs, alongside stable and affordable electricity. This positions the policy environment and energy pricing strategies as critical variables in the overall TCO equation and, by extension, in the pace of EV adoption.

B. Business Transformation: Efficiency and New Opportunities with Electric Cargo Solutions

For businesses in ASEAN, particularly SMEs and those involved in logistics and delivery, the adoption of electric cargo bikes and e-trailers can offer transformative advantages beyond just cost savings, leading to enhanced operational efficiency and the potential for new service offerings.

• Operational Efficiency for Deliveries: In the often heavily congested urban environments of ASEAN cities, e-cargo bikes have demonstrated the ability to be significantly faster and more efficient than traditional delivery vans.40 Their smaller footprint and agility allow them to utilize bike lanes, take shortcuts unavailable to larger vehicles, and park with much greater ease, often directly at the delivery point.60 This can lead to shorter delivery times and higher productivity. For instance, FedEx operations in Taiwan reported a 5-6% improvement in efficiency (stops per hour and on-road performance) with the use of electric tricycles in congested urban areas.63 This is particularly valuable for time-sensitive deliveries common in e-commerce and food delivery sectors, where companies like Grab and Foodpanda operate extensively.18
• Increased Load Capacity: Compared to standard bicycles or even many conventional motorcycles adapted for delivery, purpose-built electric cargo bikes and e-trailers offer substantially increased load capacity.37 This allows businesses to transport heavier or bulkier goods in a single trip, reducing the number of return journeys to a depot or warehouse, thereby saving time and resources.63 This capability directly addresses the needs of various SMEs, including mobile vendors carrying stock, repair services transporting tools and parts, and small-scale logistics operations.
• Access to Restricted Areas: As ASEAN cities increasingly look for ways to mitigate pollution and traffic congestion, they may implement low-emission zones (LEZs) or areas with restricted access for larger, more polluting vehicles. E-bikes and cargo bikes, being zero-emission at the point of use, can often gain access to these zones, providing a competitive advantage for businesses that rely on them.40
• New Business Models and Service Enhancement: The versatility of electric cargo solutions, especially customizable e-trailers, can enable entirely new business models or significantly enhance existing ones. Examples include mobile vending setups like food carts or retail kiosks built onto trailers (e.g., mobile kitchen or market stall concepts 38), hyper-local delivery services tailored to specific neighborhoods, and specialized transport services for tradespeople needing to carry specific tools and equipment.40 The ability to efficiently move goods and services directly to the customer in urban settings opens up diverse entrepreneurial opportunities.
• Improved Brand Image: In an era of growing consumer environmental consciousness, businesses that adopt eco-friendly transportation methods like e-cargo bikes can significantly boost their brand image and demonstrate a commitment to sustainability.40 This can be a valuable differentiator in competitive markets.
• Employee Benefits: For the riders and drivers, electric cargo solutions can offer a more comfortable and less physically demanding work experience compared to operating heavy vans in traffic or using non-assisted cargo bicycles with heavy loads.40 This can lead to increased job satisfaction, better health outcomes, and potentially higher employee retention.61

The following table outlines the suitability of e-bikes and cargo e-trailers for various ASEAN small businesses:

Table 2: E-Bike and Cargo E-Trailer Suitability for ASEAN Small Businesses

 

Business Type	Key Requirements	E-Bike/E-Trailer Suitability & Considerations
Street Food Vendor	Moderate range, significant load capacity (food, cooking gear, supplies), stability, maneuverability, weather protection for goods, low upfront cost, potential for customization (e.g., cooling, display).38	Cargo E-Bike/E-Trailer: High potential. E-trailers offer modularity for specific setups (e.g., mobile kitchen 38). Load capacity up to 200kg+.38 Requires durable design for daily use. Electric assist crucial for heavy loads. Weather protection (tarps, custom boxes) essential. Cost is a key factor; financing/leasing needed.
Small Retail Delivery (e.g., groceries, pharmacy, local shops)	Short to moderate range, variable load (small parcels to larger grocery bags), speed in congestion, secure cargo space, reliability, cost-effectiveness.17	E-Bike with Basket/Rack or Small E-Trailer: Very suitable. E-bikes for smaller, quicker deliveries. E-trailers 37 for larger grocery runs. Lockable boxes 38 for security. Low running costs are a major plus. Foldable e-bikes 24 could be useful for couriers using public transport for part of the journey.
Mobile Repair Service (e.g., plumbing, electronics, handyman)	Moderate range, capacity for tools and spare parts, organized storage, ability to navigate residential areas, reliability.40	Cargo E-Bike or E-Trailer with Custom Storage: Good fit. E-trailers can be outfitted with toolboxes/racks. Cargo e-bikes 41 offer integrated solutions. Maneuverability is key for reaching clients in dense areas. Durability needed for carrying tools.
Local Artisan/Crafter (delivering goods to markets/customers)	Variable range (local to wider city), capacity for delicate or bulky handmade items, protection from elements, professional appearance.	E-Bike with Secure Trailer or Cargo E-Bike: Suitable. Enclosed trailers 38 protect goods. Smooth ride important for delicate items. Brand image enhanced by eco-friendly delivery.40
Last-Mile Logistics Micro-Hub Operator	Short, frequent trips from hub, high maneuverability, moderate load per trip but high daily volume, fast turnaround (battery swapping ideal), robust and durable vehicles.39	Fleet of E-Cargo Bikes/E-Trikes: Excellent application. E-cargo bikes are proven faster than vans in dense areas.40 E-trikes (used by FedEx Taiwan 63) offer more stability/capacity. Battery swapping 15 crucial for minimizing downtime. Durability for intensive use is paramount. Centralized charging/maintenance at micro-hub.

The advent of electric cargo solutions, particularly e-bike trailers, has the potential to unlock a new wave of “micro-entrepreneurship” within the densely populated urban landscapes of ASEAN. These cities are characterized by high population density and a significant, vibrant informal economy 15, where many small-scale entrepreneurs, such as street vendors, mobile repair technicians, and independent delivery personnel, heavily rely on conventional motorcycles for both mobility and the transportation of their goods and tools, often in an ad-hoc and sometimes overloaded manner.3 E-bike trailers offer a comparatively low-cost entry point—especially when compared to purchasing a van or even a dedicated, integrated cargo e-bike—to substantially increase carrying capacity and professionalize their mobile operations. For example, a street food vendor could utilize a specially adapted e-trailer as a compact, mobile stall 38, enhancing their reach and presentation. The electric assist, whether provided by the e-bike towing the trailer or by an integrated motor within the e-trailer itself 38, makes it feasible to transport heavier loads over urban distances with significantly less physical exertion. This capability could expand the range of goods that can be carried, the types of services that can be offered on the go, and the geographical area a micro-entrepreneur can cover. Consequently, this could lower the barrier to entry for new micro-enterprises or enable existing ones to scale their operations, particularly in last-mile services where maneuverability and the ability to navigate congested areas are paramount.

C. Beyond Economics: Environmental, Social, and Technological Pull Factors

While economic incentives are powerful, the shift towards e-bikes and cargo e-trailers in ASEAN is also influenced by a growing array of environmental, social, and technological factors that appeal to both individual consumers and businesses.

• Environmental Awareness: There is a rising consciousness across ASEAN regarding the detrimental effects of air pollution and the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions, particularly in densely populated urban centers.12 E-bikes, producing zero tailpipe emissions, are increasingly recognized as a cleaner alternative to petrol-powered vehicles.12 This concern is a significant driver for adoption, especially among environmentally aware consumers and for governments striving to meet national and international emission reduction targets. However, it’s important to note that the overall environmental benefit is also linked to the cleanliness of the electricity generation mix providing power for these vehicles.67
• Reduced Noise Pollution: A frequently overlooked but significant benefit of electric vehicles is their quiet operation. E-bikes contribute to a reduction in urban noise pollution, creating more pleasant and livable city environments.40
• Technological Appeal and Smart Features: Modern e-bikes are increasingly incorporating smart technologies that enhance their functionality and appeal, especially to a tech-savvy younger demographic. Features such as Internet of Things (IoT) integration for tracking and diagnostics, GPS navigation, and app-based connectivity for managing vehicle settings or locating charging stations are becoming more common.24 Advanced security features like smart anti-theft systems and remote control capabilities also add to their attractiveness and utility, particularly for fleet management in business applications.30
• Health and Lifestyle Benefits: While requiring less physical exertion than conventional bicycles, e-bikes still offer an element of active transport, which can be appealing to individuals looking to incorporate more physical activity into their daily routines without the strenuous effort sometimes associated with cycling in hot climates or hilly terrains.68 Studies suggest that using e-bikes in place of motorized transport can lead to a significant increase in weekly energy expenditure, yielding considerable health benefits.68
• Convenience and Ease of Use: E-bikes maintain, and in some ways enhance, the convenience factor that makes traditional scooters popular. They are easy to maneuver in congested city traffic 23 and are well-suited for last-mile connectivity, bridging gaps in public transport networks.23 Many electric models feature automatic transmission, eliminating the need for gear shifting, which simplifies operation for a wider range of users.54
• Social Influence and Public Awareness: The decision to adopt new technologies like e-bikes is often influenced by social factors. Observing friends, family, or colleagues using e-bikes, coupled with positive word-of-mouth and targeted public awareness campaigns, can significantly impact adoption intentions.53 As e-bikes become more visible, they normalize as a transport option.

While the “green” appeal of e-mobility is a growing factor, its influence as a primary driver for mass adoption in ASEAN is conditional upon the tangible benefits it offers and the effective addressing of deeper consumer concerns. ASEAN riders, as established, prioritize practicality and cost-effectiveness in their transportation choices.3 The environmental advantages of EVs can be undermined if the electricity powering them is generated from predominantly unclean sources, such as coal-dependent grids like Indonesia’s, which significantly limits the actual CO2 reduction benefits from battery electric vehicles.67 Furthermore, the environmental lifecycle of EVs, particularly the disposal and recycling of batteries, remains a valid concern for environmentally conscious consumers.12 Therefore, while being “eco-friendly” is a positive attribute that resonates with a segment of the population, it is unlikely to be the decisive factor for widespread adoption unless it is strongly complemented by clear economic advantages, proven convenience, and robust solutions to concerns such as battery lifecycle management and overall vehicle reliability. Public awareness campaigns 53 need to acknowledge and address these nuances, focusing on the holistic value proposition rather than solely on environmental claims.

IV. Roadblocks to Electrification: Understanding Rider Hesitations and Systemic Challenges

Despite the compelling advantages, the path to widespread adoption of e-bikes and cargo e-trailers in ASEAN is fraught with significant roadblocks. These range from prohibitive costs and infrastructural deficits to practical concerns about vehicle performance and deeply ingrained socio-cultural perceptions.

A. The Price Tag and Financial Accessibility

The most consistently cited barrier to e-mobility adoption in ASEAN is the high upfront cost of electric two-wheelers compared to their conventional ICE counterparts.

• High Upfront Costs: Electric motorcycles and e-bikes are often 1.5 to 2 times more expensive at the point of purchase than comparable petrol-powered models.34 This price premium is a major deterrent for the highly price-sensitive ASEAN consumer base, which includes large segments of lower to middle-income individuals and small businesses.15 Even with potential long-term savings, the initial financial outlay can be prohibitive.
• Limited Access to Affordable Financing: While the need for financing solutions is recognized, and some initiatives are emerging 15, specialized and affordable financing options specifically tailored for electric two-wheelers are not yet widespread across the region.22 Standard consumer loans or credit card installment plans may come with high interest rates, which can erode or negate the TCO benefits that e-mobility offers. This lack of accessible and suitable financing further exacerbates the challenge posed by high upfront costs.
• Battery Replacement Costs: The battery is the most expensive component of an electric two-wheeler, and concerns about its lifespan and eventual replacement cost add another layer to the TCO calculation and rider hesitation.12 Uncertainty regarding how long a battery will perform optimally and the significant expense of replacing it can deter potential buyers who are wary of unpredictable future costs. Business models like Battery-as-a-Service (BaaS) aim to mitigate this specific concern by separating battery ownership from vehicle ownership.15

This situation creates an “affordability paradox” that significantly hinders mass adoption. While e-bikes and e-scooters offer demonstrably lower running costs in terms of fuel (electricity vs. petrol) and maintenance 12, the substantially higher initial purchase price 34 acts as a formidable barrier. For a large segment of ASEAN consumers, particularly those in lower-income brackets 1 and for many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating with tight cash flows, this high upfront investment is often insurmountable, irrespective of the potential for long-term savings. The scarcity of widespread, accessible, and genuinely affordable financing options tailored to electric two-wheelers 22 compounds this issue. Standard consumer loans or credit card installment plans, if available, may carry interest rates that significantly diminish the TCO advantages. Consequently, the “cheaper to run” benefit of e-mobility frequently remains out of reach due to the “expensive to buy” reality, creating a paradox that effectively locks out a large portion of the potential market and slows the transition to electric alternatives.

B. Infrastructure Gaps: Charging, Battery Swapping, and Maintenance Networks

Beyond the initial purchase, the practical usability of electric two-wheelers is heavily dependent on a supportive infrastructure ecosystem, which remains underdeveloped in many parts of ASEAN.

• Inadequate Public Charging Infrastructure: A significant challenge across the region is the limited availability of public charging stations.15 This scarcity is particularly acute in rural areas and smaller towns 26, creating “range anxiety” and limiting the practicality of e-bikes for users who cannot reliably charge at home or at their workplace. Even where stations exist, issues like interoperability and payment systems can pose further challenges.
• Nascent Battery Swapping Network Development: Battery swapping is a promising solution, especially for commercial users who require minimal downtime. However, these networks are still in their nascent stages of development in ASEAN.22 Building out such networks requires substantial capital investment and, crucially, faces significant hurdles related to battery standardization and interoperability between different vehicle brands and swapping station providers.22 While countries like Indonesia have ambitious targets for deploying swapping stations 27, achieving the necessary scale and seamless user experience remains a work in progress.
• Deficient Maintenance and Repair Services: The ecosystem for maintaining and repairing electric two-wheelers is lagging behind that for traditional ICE vehicles. There is a notable lack of skilled technicians trained to handle the specific electrical and battery systems of e-bikes.22 The availability of genuine spare parts, especially for newer or less common e-bike models, can also be a concern, leading to extended repair times.81 The after-sales support networks for many EV brands are generally less developed and geographically widespread than those of established ICE manufacturers.22 This raises concerns among potential buyers about the long-term serviceability of their vehicles and the potential for prolonged downtime if issues arise. The complexity of e-bike systems, particularly their electronics and batteries, necessitates specialized diagnostic tools and expertise.82

These infrastructural deficits contribute to a classic “chicken and egg” dilemma in the context of EV adoption. On one hand, widespread consumer uptake of electric vehicles necessitates the presence of a robust and readily accessible charging, swapping, and maintenance infrastructure.22 Potential buyers are hesitant to invest in EVs if they are uncertain about their ability to conveniently charge their vehicles or access reliable repair services. On the other hand, private sector investment in building out this extensive infrastructure is often cautious and delayed until a critical mass of EV users emerges, thereby ensuring sufficient demand to make such ventures profitable.28 This creates a cyclical impediment: consumers are reluctant to buy EVs due to a lack of infrastructure, while companies are slow to build the necessary infrastructure due to a lack of widespread EV ownership. This implies that initial and sustained government support and strategic investment in public charging infrastructure 24, coupled with incentives to encourage the development of service and maintenance networks, are crucial to break this stalemate and effectively kickstart the e-mobility market.

C. Practical Concerns: Range, Durability, and Suitability for ASEAN Conditions

Beyond cost and infrastructure, ASEAN riders have practical concerns regarding the everyday performance, resilience, and safety of e-bikes and e-trailers, especially when considering the region’s unique environmental and usage contexts.

• Range Anxiety: The fear of the battery running out of charge before reaching a destination or a charging point is a significant psychological barrier.26 While many modern e-scooters offer a range of 80-150 km per charge 12, this may be perceived as insufficient by some users, particularly when compared to the 200-300 km range often achievable with a full tank on a petrol scooter.10 This concern is amplified by the currently limited charging infrastructure.
• Battery Lifespan and Performance in ASEAN Climates: There are valid concerns about the long-term durability and performance of batteries, especially their degradation over time and their reaction to the harsh climatic conditions prevalent in ASEAN.24 The region’s consistently hot and humid weather can adversely affect battery performance, efficiency, and overall lifespan.26 Since batteries are the most expensive component of an e-bike, their resilience in these conditions is a critical factor for consumer confidence. While lead-acid batteries are noted to be more robust in high temperatures, they come with performance drawbacks such as lower energy density and heavier weight compared to lithium-ion alternatives.26
• Vehicle Durability and Road Conditions: ASEAN road infrastructure can be highly variable and often challenging, with issues like potholes, uneven surfaces, and unpaved roads being common, particularly outside major urban centers.10 There’s a perception that e-bikes, especially lighter or less robustly built models, may not be durable enough to withstand these “rugged operating conditions”.26 This concern extends to cargo e-trailers, which also need to be sturdily constructed to handle local roads while carrying loads.42
• Safety of E-Bikes and E-Trailers: Safety is a paramount concern. The silent operation of e-bikes can pose a risk to pedestrians and other road users, necessitating features like Acoustic Vehicle Alerting Systems (AVAS).88 There are also concerns about the potentially higher speeds of some e-bikes compared to traditional bicycles, which could lead to more severe accidents if not managed properly.20 Battery safety, particularly the risk of fires due to poorly made or improperly maintained batteries, is another widely publicized concern that can deter adoption.66 The addition of cargo trailers introduces further complexities related to vehicle handling, braking distances, and stability, especially when laden.93
• Load Capacity and Practicality for Business Use: For businesses considering a switch, a key question is whether electric solutions can match the utility of their current methods. Some e-bikes might offer lower intrinsic cargo capacity compared to the often heavily (and informally) loaded traditional motorcycles used by many businesses.64 Cargo e-trailers must therefore be demonstrably practical, offering not just capacity but also maneuverability in tight urban spaces and secure cargo containment to be viable alternatives.

A crucial consideration for manufacturers and policymakers is the “ASEAN-Proofing” imperative, recognizing that standard EV models designed for other global markets may not suffice for the unique demands of this region. ASEAN presents a distinctive combination of environmental and infrastructural challenges: consistently hot and humid climates 26, heavy monsoon seasons bringing torrential rain 10, highly varied and often poor road quality with potholes and unpaved sections 10, and extremely intense urban traffic congestion.1 The durability and performance of e-bikes and their batteries are significantly impacted by these factors. For example, high temperatures can accelerate battery degradation 85, and while lead-acid batteries might offer better resilience to rugged conditions, they come with performance trade-offs.26 Standard e-bike or e-trailer models developed for European or North American contexts, with generally better road infrastructure and milder climates, may lack sufficient robustness or practical features like enhanced weatherproofing, more resilient suspension systems, or superior puncture-resistant tires needed for ASEAN conditions.42 Indeed, stakeholders in Malaysia’s E2W sector have noted a lack of products truly suitable for local roads and lifestyles.94 This underscores a pressing need for localized research and development, rigorous local testing, and thoughtful adaptation of designs by manufacturers, rather than a simple importation of off-the-shelf solutions from other markets.

D. Navigating the Regulatory Maze and Policy Deficiencies

The regulatory environment for electric two-wheelers, and particularly for newer concepts like cargo e-trailers, is a significant area of concern that can impede adoption across ASEAN.

• Lack of Standardized Regulations: A major issue is the inconsistency of policies and regulations for e-bikes across different ASEAN member states. This applies to fundamental aspects such as vehicle classification (distinguishing between e-bicycles, e-mopeds, e-motorcycles), licensing requirements for riders, safety standards for vehicles and components, and rules governing road access.24 This lack of uniformity creates uncertainty for manufacturers planning regional distribution, for importers navigating different compliance regimes, and for consumers unsure about the legality and requirements of owning and operating these vehicles.24
• Specific Regulations for Cargo E-Trailers/Vehicles: The regulatory landscape for e-bike cargo trailers and purpose-built light electric cargo vehicles is even less defined, often being largely absent in many ASEAN contexts.35 Critical questions regarding maximum permissible load limits, overall vehicle dimensions (length, width, height), specific road access rules (e.g., use of bike lanes when towing a trailer), and insurance requirements for these commercial or heavy-duty personal use applications remain unaddressed or unclear. This is a critical gap if the business use of such cargo solutions is to be effectively promoted and safely managed.
• Enforcement Challenges: Even where some rules and regulations for e-bikes or general road use exist, enforcement can be inconsistent or lax.58 This can undermine the effectiveness of safety measures and lead to non-compliance, potentially increasing risks for all road users.
• Slow Policy Adaptation: Governments and regulatory bodies may be slow to adapt their frameworks to keep pace with the rapid technological advancements and emerging new vehicle types in the e-mobility sector.66 This policy lag can stifle innovation and delay the introduction of beneficial new transport solutions.

This prevailing policy lag and lack of regulatory clarity create significant market uncertainty, which in turn stifles innovation and slows adoption. The rapid emergence of a diverse array of Light Electric Vehicles (LEVs)—including various classes of e-bikes, e-scooters, and potentially e-trailers—often outpaces the ability of regulatory bodies to develop and implement appropriate frameworks.35 The absence of clear definitions for these vehicle categories, harmonized safety and quality standards 95, and unambiguous usage rules (such as road access permissions and speed limits 50) generates confusion and apprehension among consumers. They may question, “Am I legally allowed to ride this vehicle here?” or “What are my responsibilities as an owner?”. Similarly, businesses and manufacturers face uncertainty regarding questions like, “What specific standards must my product adhere to for legal sale and operation?” or “What are the potential liabilities associated with these new vehicle types?”. This pervasive uncertainty inevitably discourages investment from manufacturers who require clear market rules and deters adoption by users who are wary of potential legal complications or unclear operational guidelines.24 For newer and more niche concepts like cargo e-trailers, this regulatory vacuum is even more pronounced and problematic 35, potentially preventing a viable and safe market from emerging despite the technological feasibility and potential demand. Therefore, the development of proactive, clear, consistent, and preferably harmonized regulations is not merely a matter of safety compliance but is a fundamental enabler of market growth and innovation in the e-mobility sector.

E. Mindset and Acceptance: Socio-Cultural Barriers and Perceptions

Beyond the tangible challenges of cost, infrastructure, and regulation, the transition to e-mobility in ASEAN also contends with a range of socio-cultural barriers and rider perceptions that can influence acceptance and adoption rates.

• Consumer Perceptions of Quality and Reliability: There can be skepticism among potential buyers regarding the performance, overall reliability, and build quality of electric vehicles, particularly if they are from less-established or newer brands.34 Past negative experiences with low-quality electronic goods or early-generation EVs can create a lasting negative perception that affects the entire category. In Malaysia, for instance, E2W adoption faces challenges beyond common issues, including the lack of a product suitable for local roads and lifestyles.94
• Cultural Attachment to Petrol Motorcycles: For decades, petrol-powered motorcycles and scooters have been deeply woven into the cultural and daily life of ASEAN nations.3 They are familiar, trusted, and represent a certain way of life for millions. Switching to an electric alternative involves more than just adopting new technology; it requires changing long-standing habits, routines (like visiting petrol stations), and a certain comfort level with a known quantity.13
• Social Status and Image: In some ASEAN societies or sub-cultures, the type or brand of motorcycle owned can be a significant indicator of social status or personal image.72 E-bikes and electric scooters, being relatively new and sometimes perceived as less powerful or utilitarian in a different way, might not yet carry the same social cachet or aspirational value as certain high-performance or iconic petrol motorcycle models. This is more pertinent for personal users than for purely functional business applications. Studies in Malaysia show environmental concerns and monetary benefits influence youth willingness to purchase e-scooters, but social norms also play a role.14
• Safety Perceptions (Rider and Pedestrian): The quiet operation of e-bikes, while a benefit in reducing noise pollution, can also be perceived as a safety risk, as pedestrians and other road users may not hear them approaching. This has led to discussions about the need for Acoustic Vehicle Alerting Systems (AVAS).88 Additionally, there are concerns about the potentially higher speeds of some e-bikes compared to traditional bicycles, and the risks this might pose if riders are inexperienced or if infrastructure is inadequate.89 The safety of e-scooters, for example, is a concern in Bangkok due to lack of regulation and infrastructure issues.100
• Lack of Awareness and Misconceptions: A general lack of awareness or understanding about the benefits, actual running costs, maintenance requirements, and proper usage of e-bikes and e-trailers can be a barrier.53 Misconceptions, perhaps fueled by isolated incidents or misinformation (e.g., regarding battery safety or lifespan), can also deter potential adopters. Public awareness campaigns are noted as important in the Philippines.53
• Trialability and Observability: The inability for potential users to easily try out e-bikes or e-trailers before making a purchase decision can hinder adoption.53 Conversely, increased visibility of these vehicles being used effectively and reliably by others in the community (observability) can significantly boost acceptance and interest.53

A significant challenge is the “perception gap,” where the documented benefits of e-mobility, such as cost savings and environmental advantages 40, have not yet fully resonated with the mainstream rider mindset in many parts of ASEAN. While experts, early adopters, and environmentally conscious individuals may clearly see these advantages, the broader population of traditional ICE two-wheeler riders might still harbor skepticism regarding the practical aspects, long-term reliability, and overall value proposition of electric alternatives when compared to the familiar and proven ICE vehicles.34 Social influence and the level of public awareness play a crucial role in shaping adoption trends.53 If an individual’s peers are not using e-bikes, or if prevailing public narratives tend to focus on potential downsides (such as concerns about battery fires 66 or limited range), then the impetus to switch will naturally be dampened. The predominantly utilitarian mindset of ASEAN riders 10 means that abstract or less immediate benefits like “environmental friendliness” might be considered secondary to more tangible perceived risks, such as “questionable quality” of new EV brands 34 or the current state of “inadequate infrastructure” for charging and maintenance.70 Overcoming this perception gap requires more than just technological advancements; it necessitates targeted and culturally sensitive communication strategies, active community engagement, and highly visible demonstrations of e-mobility’s practical advantages within the specific local contexts of ASEAN countries. Studies in the Philippines, for instance, underscore that perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) are primary drivers of adoption intention 53, indicating that benefits must be clearly demonstrable and easily understood by the target audience.

V. Accelerating the Shift: Strategic Pathways to E-Bike and Cargo E-Trailer Adoption

To overcome the identified roadblocks and capitalize on the potential of electric two-wheeler mobility, a concerted and strategic effort is required from multiple stakeholders across ASEAN. This involves crafting enabling policies, investing in essential infrastructure, fostering industry innovation, and cultivating rider confidence.

A. Crafting Enabling Policies and Consistent Regulations

A clear, supportive, and consistent regulatory framework is the bedrock for accelerating the adoption of e-bikes and cargo e-trailers.

• Develop Clear National and Regional LEV Roadmaps: ASEAN member states should develop, or refine existing, comprehensive national Light Electric Vehicle (LEV) roadmaps with specific, ambitious, and time-bound targets for the adoption of e-bikes, e-motorcycles, and critically, electric cargo solutions.34 These roadmaps should ideally include phase-out plans for the sale of new ICE two-wheelers to send a clear market signal.34 Regional coordination through ASEAN bodies can help align these roadmaps and share best practices.36
• Implement Sustained Financial Incentives: Given the significant upfront cost barrier, robust and sustained financial incentives are crucial. These should include purchase subsidies for consumers and businesses, tax exemptions or reductions (e.g., VAT, import duties, road tax) for LEVs and their batteries, and lower registration fees.15 Consideration should also be given to incentives that promote local manufacturing and assembly of LEVs and components, fostering domestic industry development.25
• Standardize Vehicle Classifications and Safety Standards: There is an urgent need to establish clear, consistent, and easily understandable classifications for different types of LEVs, including e-bikes (pedal-assist vs. throttle), electric mopeds, electric motorcycles, and, importantly, for emerging categories like electric cargo bikes and e-bike trailers. Alongside classification, comprehensive safety standards covering vehicle construction, electrical systems (especially batteries and motors), braking performance, lighting, and maximum load capacities must be developed and enforced.34 Regional harmonization of these standards, where feasible, will facilitate trade and ensure a baseline level of safety and quality across ASEAN.35
• Regulate Road Access and Usage: Clear rules of the road must be defined for different classes of LEVs. This includes specifying where they are permitted to operate (e.g., bicycle lanes, general traffic lanes, sidewalks), establishing appropriate speed limits for each category and location, and setting out clear parking regulations to prevent obstruction.50 Special consideration should be given to the operation of wider or heavier cargo e-bikes and e-trailers.
• Mandate Insurance and Address Liability: The insurance landscape for e-bikes and e-trailers, for both personal and commercial use, needs clarification. Governments should work with the insurance industry to ensure appropriate and affordable coverage options are available, and to establish clear liability frameworks in case of accidents.50
• Supportive Policies for Businesses: To encourage the adoption of e-cargo solutions by SMEs, targeted incentives could be offered, such as grants or tax benefits for purchasing e-cargo bikes or trailers. Simplified registration processes for commercial LEVs would also reduce administrative burdens.48

The following table summarizes key incentives in select ASEAN nations:

Table 3: Summary of Key Government Incentives and Policies for E-Two-Wheeler Adoption in Select ASEAN Nations

 

Country	Policy/Incentive Type	Specific Focus	Key Details/Amount (Illustrative)	Status/Duration	Relevant Snippet IDs
Thailand	Consumer Subsidies, Manufacturer Tax Breaks & Duty Reductions, Charging Infrastructure Support	E-Motorcycles, EVs, Local Production, Batteries	THB 70,000-150,000/unit subsidy for EVs; Excise tax reduction (e.g., 8% to 2%); Tax holidays for manufacturers; Investment in fast chargers. 25	Ongoing, Phase 2 (2024-2027) for subsidies. 25	25
Vietnam	Registration Fee Exemption, Special Consumption Tax (SCT) Reduction, Production Promotion	E-Motorcycles, EVs, Local Production	Full registration fee exemption for EVs (first 5 years from 2022); Lower SCT (3-15%) for EVs vs ICE (40-150%). 49	Ongoing. 49	24
Indonesia	Luxury Tax Exemption (BEVs), Tax Breaks for Manufacturers, Reduced Interest Rates, Charging Infrastructure Targets	E-Motorcycles, BEVs, Local Production, Battery Swapping	0% luxury tax for BEVs meeting local content; Tax holidays for EV/battery manufacturers (investment-based); Lower interest rates for EV purchase; Targets for 2M e-cars, 13M e-motorcycles, 30k public chargers, 67k swap stations by 2030. 27	Ongoing. 27	25
Philippines	Tax/Duty Exemptions (Imported Parts/CBUs), Income Tax Holiday (Investors), Discounts on User Charges	EV Parts, Charging Stations, EV Adoption	EVIDA: Duty exemption for CBU charging stations (8 yrs); 30% (BEV) & 15% (HEV) discount on MVUC/registration (8 yrs); Tax exemptions for EV parts. 49	EVIDA enacted; incentives active. 49	25
Malaysia	Import/Excise Duty Exemptions, Sales Tax Exemption, Road Tax Exemption, Personal Tax Relief (Charging)	CBU/CKD EVs, EV Charging Hardware	Full import/excise duty exemption for CBU EVs; Full excise/sales tax exemption for CKD EVs; Road tax exemption for EV owners; Personal tax relief up to RM2,500 for EV charging costs. 49	Active, some incentives until end of 2023/2025. 49	25

While drawing from established international standards like ISO 4210, EN 15194, UL 2849, and DIN 79010 (which is particularly relevant for cargo bikes) 95 provides a solid foundation, there is a compelling case for developing ASEAN-specific standards or at least adapting international norms to the unique regional context. The operating environment in ASEAN—characterized by hot and humid climates, frequent heavy rainfall during monsoon seasons 10, variable and often challenging road quality 10, distinct usage patterns (e.g., the prevalence of underbone motorcycles), and specific types of traffic congestion—differs markedly from that of Europe or North America where many of these standards originated. Direct, unmodified adoption of Western standards might therefore not be optimal for ensuring the safety, durability, and practicality of LEVs in ASEAN. For instance, Malaysian authorities found it necessary to incorporate specific tropical rain and flood fording tests into their E2W standards, recognizing the local environmental conditions.50 Existing ASEAN guidelines for LEV promotion already emphasize the importance of tailoring approaches to each member state’s specific context.34 This points to the need for a collaborative effort within ASEAN, possibly spearheaded by regional bodies, to develop or adapt a harmonized set of standards. Such standards would ensure a baseline of safety and quality while being directly relevant to local realities, incorporating specific regional requirements for durability, weather resistance, and performance under typical ASEAN usage conditions.

B. Investing in Essential Infrastructure and Support Ecosystems

Policy measures alone are insufficient without the tangible infrastructure to support a thriving e-mobility ecosystem. Strategic investments are required in several key areas:

• Public and Private Investment in Charging Stations: A dense, reliable, and accessible network of public charging stations, including strategically located fast chargers, is fundamental to alleviating range anxiety and making e-mobility a practical option for daily use.22 This requires both government initiatives to kickstart development and private sector participation to scale up and maintain the network.23
• Facilitating Battery Swapping Networks: For users requiring rapid turnaround, particularly commercial fleets, battery swapping offers a compelling alternative to conventional charging. Governments can facilitate the growth of these networks by promoting battery standardization (to ensure interoperability), offering incentives for the deployment of swapping stations, and creating a supportive regulatory environment for BaaS operators.15
• Developing Maintenance and Repair Infrastructure: Consumer confidence in e-mobility is heavily reliant on the availability of competent maintenance and repair services. This necessitates investment in training programs to develop a skilled workforce of technicians capable of servicing e-bikes, e-motorcycles, and their complex battery systems.22 Ensuring the ready availability of genuine spare parts is equally critical to minimize vehicle downtime.81 Support for the establishment of local service centers, particularly in areas outside major cities, will be important for widespread adoption.11
• Battery Recycling and End-of-Life Management: Addressing the environmental concerns associated with battery disposal is paramount. ASEAN nations need to proactively establish comprehensive systems for the collection, responsible disposal, and recycling of end-of-life LEV batteries.11 This promotes a circular economy and mitigates potential environmental hazards.
• Dedicated Infrastructure for LEVs: To improve safety and convenience for riders, cities should invest in dedicated infrastructure. This includes expanding networks of protected bike lanes suitable for e-bikes and potentially narrower cargo bikes, providing secure and accessible parking facilities for LEVs, and designating specific loading/unloading zones for commercial cargo bikes in urban centers.24

In the emerging and competitive EV market, the quality and accessibility of after-sales service networks will serve as a crucial competitive differentiator for brands. A primary concern for potential EV buyers is the assurance of reliable post-purchase support, including maintenance, repair, and the availability of spare parts.22 Established ICE vehicle manufacturers like Honda and Yamaha have built their market dominance in ASEAN partly on the strength of their extensive and trusted service networks.6 Many new entrants into the EV market, particularly those from outside the traditional automotive sector or newer international brands, often lack this pre-existing, widespread service infrastructure.22 Therefore, EV brands that proactively invest in developing and scaling robust, reliable, and geographically accessible after-sales service networks—as exemplified by Honda’s stated focus on this aspect for its new EV models 11—will likely gain a significant competitive advantage. Such investment goes beyond merely selling a vehicle; it is about providing a complete and reassuring ownership experience, which is critical for building long-term consumer trust and loyalty in a new technology segment.

C. Fostering Industry Innovation and Sustainable Business Models

A vibrant e-mobility sector in ASEAN will depend on continuous innovation from the industry, supported by policies that encourage sustainable business models and local value creation.

• Promoting Local Manufacturing and R&D: Governments should actively promote domestic production of e-bikes, e-motorcycles, batteries, and other key components through targeted incentives, such as tax breaks, grants for setting up manufacturing facilities, and favorable investment conditions.5 Support for local research and development (R&D) is equally important to ensure that products are specifically designed and adapted to meet the unique conditions and user preferences of ASEAN markets.11 This fosters job creation, reduces reliance on imports, and enhances the suitability of LEVs for the region.
• Encouraging Innovative Financing Solutions: To overcome the high upfront cost barrier, innovative financing mechanisms are essential. This includes promoting pay-as-you-go (PayGo) models, vehicle leasing options, and accessible microfinance schemes specifically for e-bikes and e-trailers.15 These solutions are particularly critical for enabling SMEs and lower-income individuals to access e-mobility.15
• Supporting Battery-as-a-Service (BaaS) Models: BaaS, where the battery is leased separately from the vehicle, can significantly reduce the initial purchase price of an EV and alleviate concerns about battery degradation and replacement costs. Governments can create favorable regulatory and investment conditions for BaaS providers to establish and scale their operations, including battery swapping networks.15
• Facilitating Collaboration and Partnerships: Progress in e-mobility often benefits from collaborative efforts. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) can be instrumental in developing charging infrastructure and implementing large-scale LEV deployment programs.35 Partnerships between OEMs and major fleet operators, such as ride-hailing and delivery platforms, can accelerate the adoption of e-bikes in the commercial sector and provide valuable real-world operational data.16
• Pilot Programs for Cargo E-Trailers and Business Solutions: Given that cargo e-trailers and specialized electric cargo bikes are relatively new concepts in many ASEAN markets, government and industry-supported pilot programs are crucial. These programs can help demonstrate the viability, efficiency, and economic benefits of these solutions for specific ASEAN business use cases, such as last-mile logistics, mobile vending, or SME deliveries.35 Lessons learned from international examples, like the UNEP-supported pilots in the Philippines and Vietnam 46 or New York City’s commercial cargo bike pilot 52, can inform the design and implementation of such initiatives. These pilots are vital for testing concepts in local conditions, refining vehicle designs, gathering operational data, and building market confidence.

The successful adoption of electric cargo solutions by Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in ASEAN hinges critically on two factors: the opportunity for businesses to “try-before-they-buy” and the availability of solutions that offer hyperlocal customization. SMEs, particularly micro-enterprises such as street food vendors, small retail shops offering delivery, or mobile repair services, are often characterized by limited capital and a natural aversion to financial risk associated with unproven technologies.112 The general benefits of e-cargo solutions might be appealing, but the true utility and practicality of a new vehicle like a cargo e-bike or an e-trailer must be directly proven within the specific operational context of their individual business 40; generic claims of efficiency or cost savings are often insufficient to drive investment. Therefore, pilot programs that specifically target SMEs 46, along with accessible rental or leasing options 15, would be highly effective. These allow businesses to test cargo e-solutions with minimal upfront commitment, directly experience the benefits, and assess the suitability for their unique needs before making a significant purchase. Furthermore, the diverse operational requirements of ASEAN SMEs—a food vendor might need refrigerated or insulated compartments 38, while a repair service requires secure and organized tool storage, and a delivery service prioritizes maneuverability and weather protection—mean that one-size-fits-all cargo solutions are unlikely to gain widespread traction. Consequently, customizable or modular designs for cargo e-bikes and e-trailers, such as those offered by Carla Cargo with various interchangeable boxes and setups 38, will be far more appealing and practical, allowing businesses to tailor the vehicle to their specific cargo and operational demands.

D. Cultivating Rider Awareness, Confidence, and Acceptance

Technological advancements, supportive policies, and robust infrastructure form the necessary foundation, but the ultimate success of e-mobility adoption lies in winning the hearts and minds of ASEAN riders. Cultivating awareness, building confidence, and fostering social acceptance are crucial.

• Public Awareness Campaigns: Comprehensive and sustained public awareness campaigns are needed to effectively communicate the multifaceted benefits of e-bikes and e-trailers. These campaigns should highlight not only the economic advantages (lower running costs, potential savings) and environmental pluses (zero tailpipe emissions, reduced noise) but also the convenience and practicality they offer for daily commuting and business use.24 Equally important is addressing common misconceptions and concerns, particularly regarding battery safety, lifespan, range, and maintenance requirements.66
• Rider Training and Safety Programs: To address safety concerns and promote responsible usage, accessible rider training programs should be developed and promoted. These programs should educate users on the safe operation of e-bikes (which can be faster and heavier than conventional bicycles) and e-trailers (which affect handling and braking), proper battery charging and handling procedures to minimize risks, and relevant traffic rules and etiquette.51 Such training is vital for both new riders and those transitioning from ICE motorcycles.
• Promoting Trialability and First-Hand Experience: One of the most effective ways to overcome skepticism and allow potential users to appreciate the benefits of e-mobility is to provide opportunities for first-hand experience. This can be achieved through e-bike sharing and rental programs in urban areas 24, public demonstration events, and “try-before-you-buy” schemes offered by dealers or manufacturers. Lowering the barrier to experiencing e-bikes and e-trailers can significantly influence purchasing decisions.
• Showcasing Success Stories and Diverse Use Cases: Highlighting positive experiences from early adopters—both individual commuters and businesses that have successfully integrated e-mobility solutions—can be very powerful. Case studies, testimonials, and media features showcasing how e-bikes and cargo e-trailers are being used effectively and beneficially in the local ASEAN context can build social proof and demonstrate their practical advantages.61
• Engaging with Local Communities: The planning and deployment of e-mobility solutions, including infrastructure like charging stations or dedicated lanes, should involve active engagement with local communities. This ensures that solutions are culturally appropriate, meet genuine local needs, and gain community buy-in, which is essential for long-term sustainability and acceptance.34

A particularly effective strategy for building broader social proof and acceptance for e-bikes in ASEAN involves leveraging the high visibility of delivery rider networks. Delivery riders are a ubiquitous presence in the urban landscapes of most ASEAN cities, constantly navigating streets and interacting with communities.16 Their widespread adoption of e-bikes, primarily driven by the compelling Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) benefits such as lower fuel and maintenance costs 18, serves as a continuous and highly visible public demonstration of the viability, reliability, and practicality of e-bike technology. If major delivery platform companies (such as Grab, Foodpanda, Gojek, and others prominent in the region 18) actively promote or facilitate the transition to e-bikes for their vast rider fleets—for example, through partnerships offering favorable leasing terms, access to Battery-as-a-Service (BaaS) programs, or subsidized e-bike purchases—this would create a large and influential fleet of e-bike “ambassadors.” Other potential users, including personal commuters and operators of different types of businesses, who witness these e-bikes being reliably and effectively used day-in and day-out by demanding delivery riders in challenging urban conditions, are likely to gain significantly increased confidence in the technology’s suitability for the ASEAN environment. This widespread, real-world demonstration can powerfully accelerate broader social acceptance and adoption, as observability of a technology in practical use is a known factor in influencing adoption decisions.70

VI. Conclusion: Charting the Course for Electrified Two-Wheeler Mobility in ASEAN

The ASEAN region, with its unparalleled reliance on two-wheeled vehicles for personal and commercial transport, stands on the cusp of a significant mobility transformation. The potential for e-bikes and innovative cargo e-trailer solutions to reshape daily commutes, empower small businesses, and contribute to more sustainable urban environments is immense. This report has delineated the current landscape, explored the motivations for and impediments to this electric shift, and outlined strategic pathways to accelerate adoption.

The journey is driven by compelling economic logic, as e-bikes offer substantial long-term savings in operational and maintenance costs, a critical factor in price-sensitive ASEAN markets. For the vibrant SME sector and the booming logistics industry, electric cargo solutions promise not just cost efficiencies but also enhanced operational capabilities, opening avenues for new business models and improved service delivery. Growing environmental awareness and the appeal of cleaner, quieter, and technologically advanced vehicles further bolster the case for electrification.

However, the path is not without formidable obstacles. The high upfront cost of electric two-wheelers remains the primary barrier, often placing them beyond the reach of average consumers and small enterprises despite attractive TCO projections. This is compounded by gaps in affordable and accessible financing. Critical infrastructure, including widespread public charging networks, standardized and scalable battery-swapping systems, and a proficient maintenance and repair ecosystem, is still in its developmental stages. Practical concerns regarding vehicle range, battery durability in tropical climates, and overall robustness on varied ASEAN road conditions persist. Furthermore, the regulatory frameworks governing these new vehicle types, especially for cargo applications, are often fragmented or incomplete, creating uncertainty. Deeply ingrained user habits, cultural attachment to traditional petrol motorcycles, and varied social perceptions regarding the quality, safety, and status of electric alternatives also present significant, though surmountable, challenges.

To navigate these complexities and unlock the full potential of electrified two-wheeler mobility, a holistic and collaborative multi-stakeholder approach is imperative. This involves:

• Governments: Crafting clear, consistent, and forward-looking national and regional LEV roadmaps with specific targets; implementing sustained and accessible financial incentives; establishing harmonized vehicle and safety standards, particularly for cargo solutions; investing in foundational public charging infrastructure; and streamlining regulations for road use, insurance, and business operations.
• Industry: Innovating to develop “ASEAN-proof” e-bikes and cargo solutions that are durable, affordable, and tailored to local needs and conditions; investing in local manufacturing and R&D; building robust after-sales service and spare parts networks; and collaborating on battery standardization for swapping systems.
• Financial Institutions: Developing and scaling innovative and accessible financing products, including microfinance, leasing, and PayGo models, to make e-mobility affordable for individuals and SMEs.
• Civil Society and Academia: Playing a vital role in public awareness campaigns, rider education and safety training, independent research, and community engagement to foster understanding and acceptance.

Ultimately, the successful transition to e-bikes and cargo e-trailers in ASEAN will not be a simple like-for-like replacement of existing ICE vehicles. It necessitates a fundamental reimagining of urban and commercial mobility ecosystems. This transformation requires sustained innovation not only in vehicle technology but also in business models, infrastructure development, and policy frameworks, all meticulously tailored to the unique socio-economic, cultural, and environmental tapestry of the region. The “how” of this transition—the strategic planning, collaborative execution, and adaptive management—will be as critical as understanding the “what” and “why.” By embracing this comprehensive approach, ASEAN can chart a course towards a future where two-wheeled electric mobility significantly contributes to economic development, environmental sustainability, and an improved quality of life for its citizens.

Works cited

1. ASEAN Motorcycle Markets and their impact on Car Markets, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.abeam.com/content/dam/abeam/th/en/insights/asean_motorcycle_markets/ABeam%20FY22%20-%20Vol.%2004%20-%20Motorcycle%20ASEAN_v1.pdf
2. In-depth analysis of Southeast Asia electric motorcycle market – TYCORUN Battery Swap, accessed May 6, 2025, https://batteryswapcabinet.com/in-depth-analysis-of-southeast-asia-electric-motorcycle-market/
3. Motor Scooters: Southeast Asia’s Top Choice for Transport – Freudenberg Sealing Technologies, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.fst.com/news-stories/magazine/e-mobility/motor-scooters-rule-southeast-asia/
4. theicct.org, accessed May 6, 2025, https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/asia-pacificlvsNDC-TIA-23W-market-ASEAN-countries-jun22.pdf
5. Vietnam Motorcycles Data & Facts 2025 | MotorcyclesData, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.motorcyclesdata.com/2025/04/14/vietnam-motorcycles/
6. Motorcycles in ASEAN – Speeda ASEAN, accessed May 6, 2025, https://sea.ub-speeda.com/asean-insights/industry-reports/motorcycles-southeast-asia/
7. Motorcycle Culture in South East Asia – MOTOPRIX Blog, accessed May 6, 2025, https://blog.motoprix.com/blog/posts/motorcycle-culture-in-south-east-asia
8. Underbone – Wikipedia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underbone
9. “Bro how do you know I’m Southeast Asian?”. The type of bikes in their garage – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/motorcycles/comments/1ibzpxg/bro_how_do_you_know_im_southeast_asian_the_type/
10. Why Southeast Asia Runs on Two Wheels – iMotorbike News, accessed May 6, 2025, https://news.imotorbike.com/en/2025/04/southeast-asia-motorcycles-transport/
11. Honda’s Full-scale Entry into Asia in 2024, the First Year of Global Electric Motorcycle Expansion | Honda Stories, accessed May 6, 2025, https://global.honda/en/stories/150-2412-Honda-India-electric-motorcycle.html
12. Electric scooter vs Petrol scooter – Which is best in 2025 ?, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.bikeleague.in/motorcycle-articles/motorcycle-featured-articles/electric-scooter-vs-petrol-scooter-which-is-best/
13. Factors Influencing Electric Motorcycle Adoption in Indonesia: Comprehensive Psychological, Situational, and Contextual Perspectives – MDPI, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/16/2/106
14. Electric scooter – intention and adoption of alternative mode of transportation for Malaysian youth | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381479775_Electric_scooter_-_intention_and_adoption_of_alternative_mode_of_transportation_for_Malaysian_youth
15. Electrifying India’s and Southeast Asia’s transportation backbone, accessed May 6, 2025, https://crossboundary.com/electric-two-and-three-wheelers-india-southeast-asia-transportation/
16. Motorcycle growth prospects in Southeast Asia | Roland Berger, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/The-rise-of-business-use-two-wheelers-in-Asia.html
17. Southeast Asia Electric Bike Market Size, Share Forecast 2034 | MRFR, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/southeast-asia-electric-bike-market-12643
18. E-Bike vs Pedal Power 101 for Food Delivery Riders in Singapore: Good Things You Must Know!, accessed May 6, 2025, https://ekolife.asia/e-bike-vs-pedal-for-food-delivery-riders-in-singapore/
19. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking System Advocacy Campaign – ASEAN – UN Road Safety Fund, accessed May 6, 2025, https://roadsafetyfund.un.org/projects/motorcycle-anti-lock-braking-system-advocacy-campaign-asean
20. Highest volume of motorcycles by country : r/Thailand – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Thailand/comments/1fy12xq/highest_volume_of_motorcycles_by_country/
21. Electric Scooters Vs. Motorbikes: The Ultimate Showdown For …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://escooter.my/electric-scooters-vs-motorbikes-the-ultimate-showdown
22. The rise of EV two-wheelers in Southeast Asia – East Ventures, accessed May 6, 2025, https://east.vc/news/insights/the-rise-of-ev-two-wheelers-in-southeast-asia/
23. ASEAN Electric Two-Wheeler Market Size and Growth Report 2029F – TechSci Research, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.techsciresearch.com/report/asean-electric-two-wheeler-market/7974.html
24. ASEAN E-Bike Market Size, Share, Scope, Trends & Forecast, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/asean-e-bike-market/
25. A road map for revving up the Asian electric two-wheeler market – McKinsey & Company, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/a-road-map-for-revving-up-the-asian-electric-two-wheeler-market
26. ASEAN E-Bike Market – Size, Share & Analysis – Mordor Intelligence, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/asean-e-bike-market
27. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Economic Implications, Challenges, and Opportunities of Electric Vehicle Adoption in Indonesia – MDPI, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1384
28. $2.8 Billion Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Market Future Trends and Forecasts to 2029: Case Studies of NIO and Gogoro – GlobeNewswire, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/01/29/3017060/28124/en/2-8-Billion-Electric-Vehicle-Battery-Swapping-Market-Future-Trends-and-Forecasts-to-2029-Case-Studies-of-NIO-and-Gogoro.html
29. Southeast Asia’s First Battery-Swapping Taxis – The EV Report, accessed May 6, 2025, https://theevreport.com/southeast-asias-first-battery-swapping-taxis
30. Top 10 electric motorcycle manufacturers in Southeast Asia – Best …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.benlg.com/top-10-electric-motorcycle-manufacturers-in-southeast-asia/
31. Best top 10 electric bike manufacturers in Southeast Asia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.gzsamebike.com/top-10-electric-bike-manufacturers-in-southeast-asia/
32. Honda Việt Nam rolls out first domestically produced electric scooter – Vietnam News, accessed May 6, 2025, https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/1694758/honda-viet-nam-rolls-out-first-domestically-produced-electric-scooter.html
33. Why is the Honda ICON e: Important for Vietnam? – Insight EV, accessed May 6, 2025, https://insightev.com/why-is-this-honda-small-scooter-important-for-viertnam-2/
34. Paving the Way for ASEAN to Adopt Electric Motorcycles – ADB Seads, accessed May 6, 2025, https://seads.adb.org/articles/paving-way-asean-adopt-electric-motorcycles
35. asean.org, accessed May 6, 2025, https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ASEAN-Guidelines-LEV_approved-33rd-LTWG_CRD_clean.pdf
36. ASEAN Guidelines for the Promotion of Light Electric Vehicles – Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie, accessed May 6, 2025, https://wupperinst.org/en/a/wi/a/s/ad/8792/
37. Folding Cargo eBike Trailer – JACS e-Bikes, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.jacsebikes.com/products/folding-cargo-ebike-trailer
38. CARLA CARGO | bike trailer and handcart made in black forest!, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.carlacargo.de/
39. Electric Cargo Bikes Can Be a Key Tool for Freight Mobility | PeopleForBikes, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.peopleforbikes.org/news/electric-cargo-bikes-can-be-a-key-tool-for-freight-mobility
40. Cargo Bikes 101 – Why Electric Cargo Bikes Are Perfect For Your …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://papayadash.com/blog/cargo-bikes-101-why-electric-cargo-bikes-are-perfect-for-your-last-mile-fleet
41. Lynx Cargo E-Bike – troxus, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.troxusmobility.com/products/lynx-cargo-e-bike
42. HSD: Easy-to-ride, compact Bosch e-cargo bike – Tern Bicycles, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ternbicycles.com/sv/bikes/471/hsd
43. Exclusive: the e-trailer that transforms any bike into a family cargo bike in seconds, accessed May 6, 2025, https://zagdaily.com/tech/exclusive-the-e-trailer-that-transforms-any-bike-into-a-family-cargo-bike-in-seconds/
44. Swedish-made cargo electric bikes from Ecoride, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ecoride.com/en-fi/electric-bikes/electric-cargo-bike
45. Electric Cargo eBikes | Lectric eBikes®, accessed May 6, 2025, https://lectricebikes.com/collections/cargo-ebikes
46. Paving the way for electric mobility in South-East Asia – UNEP, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/paving-way-electric-mobility-south-east-asia
47. Philippines Electric Motorcycle Pilot Project, accessed May 6, 2025, https://sustmob.org/EMOB/pdf/Philippines_BMU-IKI%20Project%20Brief_Final.pdf
48. Light ElectricVehicles – ASEAN, accessed May 6, 2025, https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ASEAN-Guidelines-LEV_ISBN.pdf
49. theicct.org, accessed May 6, 2025, https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2.-Prof.-Savitri_Current-Profile-of-Transport-Electrification-in-ASEAN-Countries.pdf
50. ASEAN E2/3W STANDARDS & POLICY, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.sustmob.org/EMOB/pdf/2_3WheelerConf/ASEAN_Small%20EV%20Stds%20Generation.pdf
51. NYC DOT Authorizes the Use of E-Cargo Bikes on City Streets and Establishes Key Safety Standards, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/pr2024/e-cargo-bike-on-city-streets.shtml
52. Commercial Cargo Bicycle Pilot | NYC.gov, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/commercial-cargo-bicycle-pilot-evaluation-report.pdf
53. Exploring Factors Influencing E-Bike Adoption Among Filipino Commuters: An Integrated Diffusion of Innovation and Technology Acceptance Model – MDPI, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/16/2/113
54. Differences between an Electric & Petrol Motorbike | www.mogo.co.ke, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mogo.co.ke/news/14/differences-petrolvs-electric-motorbike
55. EV Scooters vs. Petrol Motorcycles | Which is a Better Deal in 2024? – PakWheels Blog, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.pakwheels.com/blog/petrol-motorcycles-vs-ev-scooters-which-is-a-better-deal-in-2024/
56. Electric Cargo Bike Market Size, Share and Forecast 2032 – Credence Research, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/electric-cargo-bike-market
57. 2024-2025 E-Bike Incentive Programs in Europe – Tern Bicycles, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ternbicycles.com/en/explore/more-from-tern/2024-2025-e-bike-incentive-programs-europe
58. Asia Pacific E-Bike Market Size, Share & Trends, 2033, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-reports/asia-pacific-e-bike-market
59. Zero-emission vehicle deployment: ASEAN markets – International Council on Clean Transportation, accessed May 6, 2025, https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/asiahvszev-deploy-aseanapr22.pdf
60. The Business Case for Cargo Bikes, accessed May 6, 2025, https://cargobikefestival.com/features/the-business-case-for-cargo-bikes/
61. E-Bikes for Deliveries: Denver’s pilot program to reduce car trips – YouTube, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-TVdmtEo84
62. Four Surprising Uses for E-Cargo Bikes in Business – Treehugger, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.treehugger.com/four-surprising-uses-e-cargo-bikes-business-5199121
63. How Electric Tricycles Drive Sustainable Transport In Taiwan | FedEx Malaysia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.fedex.com/en-my/business-insights/sustainability/electric-tricycles-reshaping-logistics-in-taiwan.html
64. E-bike vs electric motorcycle for delivery riders – Whizz, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.getwhizz.com/blog/how-to-choose/e-bike-vs-electric-motorcycle-for-delivery-riders
65. Food delivery using bike or motor account? : r/askSingapore – Reddit, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askSingapore/comments/une6gb/food_delivery_using_bike_or_motor_account/
66. As E-Bikes Surge, We Need to Address Both the Opportunities and Challenges, accessed May 6, 2025, https://itdp.org/2025/03/04/e-bikes-surge-we-need-to-address-both-opportunities-and-challenges-stmagazine-36/
67. www.eria.org, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/Research-Project-Report/2020-14-Electrified-Vehicle-ASEAN/12_Chapter-5.pdf
68. A scoping review of the design and characteristics of e-bike financial incentives – OSF, accessed May 6, 2025, https://osf.io/5xgch/download
69. E-Scooter Vs Bike: Which Is Right For You? – Kaabo, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.kaabo.com/blog/e-scooter-vs-bike-which-is-right-for-you/
70. (PDF) Exploring Factors Influencing E-Bike Adoption Among Filipino …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389152902_Exploring_Factors_Influencing_E-Bike_Adoption_Among_Filipino_Commuters_An_Integrated_Diffusion_of_Innovation_and_Technology_Acceptance_Model
71. Technology Acceptance Factors Affecting Intention to Use Electric Motorcycles in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region – Asean Citation Index, accessed May 6, 2025, https://search.asean-cites.org/article.html?b3BlbkFydGljbGUmaWQ9ODEyNzI1
72. Why has motorcycle-mad SEA been slow to adopt two-wheel EVs? – Tech in Asia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.techinasia.com/motorcyclemad-sea-slow-adopt-twowheel-evs
73. PayGo for E-bikes Partnership – P4G, accessed May 6, 2025, https://p4gpartnerships.org/paygo-e-bikes
74. Financial inclusion and microfinance | Asian Development Bank, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.adb.org/subjects/financial-inclusion-and-microfinance
75. Small and medium enterprise (SME) financing | Asian Development Bank, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.adb.org/subjects/small-and-medium-enterprise-sme-financing
76. Fundbox Asia: Easyride, accessed May 6, 2025, https://fundbox.asia/
77. Electric Bike Financing From Rad | Rad Power Bikes, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.radpowerbikes.com/pages/financing
78. Kazakhstan’ s new blue ocean: opportunities and challenges for electric two- and three-wheelers – TYCORUN Battery Swap, accessed May 6, 2025, https://batteryswapcabinet.com/kazakhstan-s-new-blue-ocean-opportunities-and-challenges-for-electric-two-and-three-wheelers/
79. ABB BESS Paper – EU-ASEAN Business Council, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.eu-asean.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ABB-BESS-Paper_FINAL-VER-PDF_compressed.pdf
80. A Comprehensive Review on Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Stations – ResearchGate, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377759162_A_Comprehensive_Review_on_Electric_Vehicle_Battery_Swapping_Stations
81. The Hidden Delays: Understanding Why Ebike Repairs Take Time in Singapore 2024, accessed May 6, 2025, https://ekolife.asia/understanding-why-ebike-repair-take-time-in-singapore/
82. Electric Bike Service Market’s Consumer Preferences: Trends and Analysis 2025-2033, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/electric-bike-service-1367401
83. How Tariffs Are Affecting the Ebike Industry and How Aventon is Responding, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.aventon.com/blogs/aventon_bikes/how-tariffs-are-affecting-the-ebike-industry-and-how-aventon-is-responding
84. Preventing Dreadful Costly Ebike Repairs: The Importance of Routine Maintenance 2025, accessed May 6, 2025, https://ekolife.asia/preventing-costly-ebike-repairs-the-importance-2025/
85. How Long Does An E-Bike Battery Last? – Really Good Ebikes, accessed May 6, 2025, https://reallygoodebikes.com/blogs/electric-bike-blog/how-long-does-an-e-bike-battery-last
86. Road Trailers Market Size, Share,Statistics & Revenue by 2032 – Straits Research, accessed May 6, 2025, https://straitsresearch.com/report/road-trailers-market
87. (PDF) Electric cargo cycles – A comprehensive review – ResearchGate, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357320625_Electric_cargo_cycles_-_A_comprehensive_review
88. Guidelines on The Integration of Electric Two- and Three- Wheelers in Urban Traffic – Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, accessed May 6, 2025, https://itdp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/20230202-Output-2B-Urban-Traffic-Integration.pdf
89. Delivery and Rideshare: The Switch to Electric Vehicles | eBikes.org, accessed May 6, 2025, https://ebikes.org/general/delivery-and-rideshare-the-switch-to-electric-vehicles/
90. Protecting Chinese e-bike users from road injuries and deaths, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.who.int/china/activities/protecting-chinese-e-bike-users-from-road-injuries-and-deaths
91. E-bikes could cut smog, energy use and congestion globally — but will they? – Mongabay, accessed May 6, 2025, https://news.mongabay.com/2024/04/e-bikes-could-cut-smog-energy-use-and-congestion-globally-but-will-they/
92. E-Bike Safety, accessed May 6, 2025, https://trafficsafetyteam.org/e-bike-safety/
93. Calculate cargo e-bike payload & load correctly – YouMo, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.youmo.ch/en/e-bike-loading/
94. MALAYSIA’S MOTORCYCLE SECTOR – ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/TRS26_24.pdf
95. E-Bike Certifications—The Ones That Really Matter for Your Safety – Tern Bicycles, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ternbicycles.com/us/explore/product-safety/e-bike-certifications-ones-really-matter-your-safety
96. Ebike Laws Around the World – HOVSCO, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.hovsco.com/blogs/blogs/ebike-laws-around-the-world
97. Factors Influencing Purchase Intention To Buy Electric Motorcycles In Indonesia With Attitude As A Mediation Variable, accessed May 6, 2025, https://ijstm.inarah.co.id/index.php/ijstm/article/view/1264
98. Electrifying Vietnam’s Streets: A Case Study on the Adoption of Electric Two-Wheelers – Murdoch Research Portal, accessed May 6, 2025, https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=61MUN_INST&filePid=13153152950007891&download=true
99. Introducing E-scooters to the Da Nang Market and User’s Attitudes – Theseus, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/809864/Quan_Dat.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
100. Between User’s Practice and Infrastructure Condition: Safety Challenges of E-scooters Utilization in Bangkok, Thailand – ResearchGate, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374811414_Between_User’s_Practice_and_Infrastructure_Condition_Safety_Challenges_of_E-scooters_Utilization_in_Bangkok_Thailand
101. Do Thai people like riding scooters? – Quora, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.quora.com/Do-Thai-people-like-riding-scooters
102. Acceptance of e-motorcycles: A longitudinal study based on a survey of motorcyclists at the motorcyclist – EVS36, accessed May 6, 2025, http://evs36.com/wp-content/uploads/finalpapers/FinalPaper_Schreier_Norbert.pdf
103. Navigating Manila’s Streets with Electric Bikes: A Sustainable Transport Solution, accessed May 6, 2025, https://richestph.com/navigating-manilas-streets-with-electric-bikes-a-sustainable-transport-solution/
104. asean plus three leaders’ statement on developing of electric vehicle ecosystem, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100551479.pdf
105. Vietnam Electric Motorcycle Pilot Project – Sustainable Mobility, accessed May 6, 2025, https://sustmob.org/EMOB/pdf/Vietnam_BMU-IKI%20Country%20Project%20Brief_Final.pdf
106. Decarbonisation of Transport: – The Journey of Electric Vehicles in ASEAN – KPMG International, accessed May 6, 2025, https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/sg/pdf/2021/04/Decarbonisation_of_transport.pdf
107. 2024-2025 E-Bike Incentive Programs in North America – Tern Bicycles, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.ternbicycles.com/en/explore/more-from-tern/2024-2025-e-bike-incentive-programs-north-america
108. EV Ecosystem in the Philippines Boosted By $100M Support from Asian Development Bank, accessed May 6, 2025, https://cleantechnica.com/2025/01/29/ev-ecosystem-in-the-philippines-boosted-by-100m-support-from-asian-development-bank/
109. Framework for Improving ASEAN Infrastructure Productivity, accessed May 6, 2025, https://connectivity.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Publication-Framework-for-Improving-ASEAN-Infrastructure-Productivity.pdf
110. Overview of the ASEAN-6 Automotive Market – PwC, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.pwc.com/vn/en/publications/2025/asean-automative-market.pdf
111. Hyena delivers integrated e-bike systems for Asia, accessed May 6, 2025, https://manufacturing.asia/videos/hyena-delivers-integrated-e-bike-systems-asia
112. ASEAN IN TRANSFORMATION – ILO Research Repository, accessed May 6, 2025, https://researchrepository.ilo.org/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=41ILO_INST&filePid=13100784380002676&download=true
113. Study on Accelerating Energy Technology Development in ASEAN: A Case Study of Thailand, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.eria.org/uploads/Study-on-Accelerating-Energy-Technology-Development-in-ASEAN.pdf
114. Promoting Efficient and Competitive Intra-ASEAN Shipping Services, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/AADCP-REPSF-Project/Main-Report.pdf
115. Guidelines for the Development of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMP) in ASEAN Metropolitan Regions, accessed May 6, 2025, https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/asean-sump-guidelines-english.pdf
116. Lessons from Implementing a Metropolitan Electric Bike Sharing System – MDPI, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6240
117. As E-Bikes Surge, We Need to Address Both the Opportunities and …, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.itdp.org/2025/03/04/e-bikes-surge-we-need-to-address-both-opportunities-and-challenges-stmagazine-36/
118. Outcome Report – Open UN Environment Programme, accessed May 6, 2025, https://open.unep.org/resolution/outcome-report/130
119. The Impact Of E-Commerce On Small And Medium Enterprises In The Second District Of Albay – International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, accessed May 6, 2025, https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-impact-of-e-commerce-on-small-and-medium-enterprises-in-the-second-district-of-albay/
120. Introducing E-Bike Smart, a New Rider Education Program – PeopleForBikes, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.peopleforbikes.org/news/introducing-e-bike-smart-a-new-rider-education-program
121. Electric 2 Wheelers in Asia: A Snapshot of Business Models and Approaches, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.asiacleanenergypartners.com/post/2-wheeler-ev-business-models
122. Future Perspective of Electric Bicycles in Sustainable Mobility in China by Xiao Lin – -ORCA – Cardiff University, accessed May 6, 2025, https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/94809/12/2016%20LinXPhDThesis2%20DPR.pdf
123. Hot or not? The role of cycling in ASEAN megacities: Case studies of Bangkok and Manila, accessed May 6, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2017.1384522