Novel Divergent Thinking: Critical Solutions for the Future

Modeling the Interplay of Cognition, Emotion, and Personalized Health: A Geometric Associative Memory Approach

by | Apr 4, 2025 | Catalyzer_Think_Tank, Ipvive, Lenzu

Co-developed by the Catalyzer Think Tank divergent thinking and Gemini Deep Research tool.

1. Introduction: Navigating the Complexity of Individual Differences

Understanding the intricate tapestry of individual human experience, encompassing cognitive processes, emotional responses, physical well-being, skill acquisition, and character development, presents a formidable challenge. Traditional models often fall short in capturing the dynamic and adaptive nature of the interrelationships between these multifaceted dimensions. The limitations of linear or reductionist approaches become apparent when attempting to grasp the holistic and context-dependent factors that shape each unique individual. In response to this complexity, theoretical frameworks like field theory offer a more encompassing perspective, while advancements in computational modeling, such as geometric associative memory, hold promise as powerful tools for representing and analyzing these intricate connections. This report aims to explore the theoretical underpinnings and potential of a granular to long-chained geometric associative memory, grounded in the principles of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, metric topology, and homology, for achieving a more precise and scalable understanding of the nuanced landscape of individual differences. By delving into the foundational concepts and considering current research at the forefront of psychological science, this analysis seeks to evaluate the potential of this novel approach to illuminate the complex and adaptive inter-relationship spaces that define human individuality.

2. Foundations in Field Theory

2.1 Defining Field Theory in Psychology

Field theory in psychology offers a systematic and holistic lens through which to examine behavior. It posits that an individual’s actions and experiences are best understood by considering the dynamic interplay between the person and their entire environment, often referred to as the “life space” or “psychological field”.1 This perspective has its roots in Gestalt psychology, which emphasizes the importance of perceiving the whole rather than just the sum of its parts.1 The central tenet of field theory is that behavior emerges from a constellation of coexisting facts within this dynamic field, where every element is interdependent.2

Kurt Lewin, a key figure in the development of field theory, proposed that behavior (B) is a function (f) of the life space (LS), which itself is a product of the interaction between the person (P) and their environment (E), expressed as B = f(LS) = F(P,E).2 The life space encompasses all the psychological facts and social forces that influence an individual at a specific time.2 This environment is not merely the objective situation but is subjectively perceived by each individual based on their unique needs, beliefs, values, and abilities.2 Understanding an individual’s life space necessitates considering all aspects of their conscious and unconscious environment as an integrated whole.2 The dynamic nature of this field is crucial; it is constantly flowing and changing, with each part potentially holding meaning and importance.2 Consequently, no two individuals experience the same situation identically, and even a single person’s experience of a field evolves over time.2

2.2 Applications of Field Theory

Field theory provides a versatile framework for analyzing a wide spectrum of human behavior. Lewin’s work emphasized the role of interpersonal conflict, individual personalities, and situational variables in shaping actions.2 The theory has been applied to understand motivation, suggesting that individuals are driven to resolve tensions within their life space.2 Furthermore, field theory has significantly contributed to the study of group dynamics, examining how behavior is influenced by the total field situation in social contexts.2 Its principles are also foundational to Gestalt therapy, which focuses on the individual’s experience within the organism-environment field and emphasizes awareness of the present moment to facilitate personal growth and healing.2

While the term “field theory” may not be explicitly prevalent in contemporary discussions of personalized health, the underlying principles resonate strongly with its core tenets.11 Personalized medicine, at its essence, acknowledges the unique characteristics of individuals at multiple levels – molecular, physiological, environmental, and behavioral – and advocates for tailoring interventions accordingly.12 This aligns with field theory’s emphasis on the inseparability of the individual from their environment in understanding well-being.11 The focus on individual-specific factors, including genetic predispositions and life experiences, echoes Lewin’s consideration of both the person and the environment as determinants of behavior and health.6

2.3 Limitations and Evolution

It is important to acknowledge that while Kurt Lewin’s specific formulation of field theory was highly influential, its direct application as a standalone theory might have evolved over time.4 Some perspectives suggest that its “current vitality” as a specific psychological theory might be limited.4 However, its broader impact on the field of psychology is undeniable, shaping the general orientation of many researchers and practitioners towards a more holistic and contextual understanding of human behavior.4 Contemporary research has built upon these foundations, integrating cognitive and emotional processes more explicitly into comprehensive models of individual functioning.

3. The Interconnectedness of Cognition, Emotion, Health, Skills, and Character

3.1 Research on Interplay

A substantial body of research underscores the intricate and bidirectional relationships between various facets of human experience, particularly cognition and emotion.15 Cognition, encompassing mental processes such as thinking, learning, and memory, works in close coordination with emotion, influencing how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to the world around them.16 This interplay affects fundamental processes like attention, memory formation, learning new information, and making decisions.17 The increasing focus on the interaction between emotion and cognition, as well as motivation and cognition, highlights their crucial role in understanding the development and maintenance of various forms of psychopathology.18

Beyond the dyadic relationship between cognition and emotion, research emphasizes the broader interconnectedness of social, emotional, and cognitive domains within the learning process.16 These domains are deeply intertwined in the brain and influence behavior in significant ways. Furthermore, during adolescence, a period of rapid development, physical, social, emotional, and cognitive changes are all interconnected, shaped by sociocultural and environmental influences.19 This integrated perspective suggests that human development and well-being cannot be adequately understood by examining these factors in isolation; a holistic approach is essential.

3.2 Holistic Models of Individual Development

Recognizing the limitations of reductionist approaches, numerous holistic models have emerged in psychology and related fields to provide a more comprehensive understanding of individual development and well-being.20 Holism in psychology emphasizes the importance of viewing the mind and behavior as a unified whole, where the individual parts can only be fully understood in relation to this integrated system.21 The fundamental principle is that individuals are more than simply the sum of their constituent parts.

Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model exemplifies a holistic approach by describing the dynamic interactions between individuals and their environments across multiple interconnected systems, including the microsystem (immediate environment), mesosystem (connections between microsystems), exosystem (indirect influences), macrosystem (cultural context), and chronosystem (influence of time and historical events).22 This model underscores the reciprocal interplay between the individual and these various levels of influence in shaping development over time.

Other models, such as the 7 Dimensions of Holistic Wellbeing (7DHW), propose a framework encompassing self-esteem, body image, social relationships, environment, meaningful work, health knowledge, and a sense of future, highlighting the interdependence of internal and external factors in fostering well-being.23 Similarly, the CASEL framework for social and emotional learning (SEL) focuses on developing competencies in self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making, emphasizing the importance of these interconnected areas for academic and personal success.26 Models like the CBT model illustrate the continuous cycle of influence between thoughts, feelings, and behaviors 25, while various emotional intelligence (EI) models emphasize the interplay between cognition and emotion in areas such as self-awareness, self-regulation, social skills, empathy, and motivation.28 The diversity of these models underscores the multifaceted nature of holistic development and the ongoing efforts to capture its complexity.

Table 1: Comparison of Holistic Development Models

 

Model Name

Key Dimensions/Components

Primary Focus

Source Snippets

Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model

Microsystem, Mesosystem, Exosystem, Macrosystem, Chronosystem

Interaction between individuals and their environments and how these relationships affect development over time.

22

7 Dimensions of Holistic Wellbeing (7DHW)

Self-esteem, Body image, Social relationships, Environment, Meaningful work, Health knowledge, A sense of future

Multi-dimensional framework encompassing psychological, social, environmental, and occupational factors contributing to well-being.

23

CASEL Framework for Social Emotional Learning

Self-awareness, Self-management, Social awareness, Relationship skills, Responsible decision-making

Cultivating skills and environments that advance students’ social, emotional, and academic development.

26

CBT Model

Thoughts, Feelings (physiological changes due to emotion), Behaviors

Interconnectedness of thoughts, emotions, and behavior and their impact on ongoing situations.

25

Goleman’s EI Model

Self-awareness, Self-regulation, Social skills, Empathy, Motivation

Awareness and management of emotions in oneself and others, enhancing personal and professional relationships.

28

Bar-On’s EI Competencies Model

Self-perception, Self-expression, Interpersonal, Decision-making, Stress management

System of interconnected behavior arising from emotional and social competencies, influencing performance and behavior.

28

Mayer-Salovey-Caruso EI Ability Model

Perceive emotion, Use emotion to facilitate thought, Understand emotions, Manage emotion

EI as a standard intelligence utilizing a distinct set of mental abilities.

28

Shaping Us Framework

Understanding our emotions, Managing our emotions, Connecting with others, Understanding and responding to others, Awareness of our world, Our sense of self, Behaving creatively and curiously, Communicating

Universal approach to understanding core social and emotional skills throughout all stages of life for a happy and healthy society.

27

Holistic Psychology Model

Personal reflection, Sub-process of transformation, Enactment of energy, Arousal and sustaining an improved state of functioning; encompassing Attention and Awareness, Emotional Management, Comprehension and Coping, Goals and Habits, Virtues, Relationships

Four major stages for achieving an improved state of functioning, emphasizing internal processes and interpersonal connections.

24

4. Introducing Geometric Associative Memory

4.1 Concept of Associative Memory

Associative memory, in the context of psychology, refers to the brain’s remarkable capacity to learn and remember the relationships between items or concepts that are not inherently linked.30 This fundamental ability allows us to connect a name with a face, the aroma of a perfume with a specific memory, or the various elements of an experienced event into a cohesive whole.35 It plays a crucial role in binding together the multimodal sensory inputs that constitute our experiences, forming a unified representation or engram.35 Associative memory is considered a declarative memory structure and is episodically based, meaning it involves conscious recall of personal experiences and their associated details.37

Various mathematical models have been proposed to describe the mechanisms underlying associative memory, ranging from early linear models to more complex connectionist models and neural networks.31 These models aim to capture how patterns of neural activity can represent memories and how cues can trigger the retrieval of associated information.30 The ability to form associations between seemingly unrelated items is considered an emergent property of the complex, non-linear dynamics of large neural networks.37

4.2 Granular to Long-Chained Approach

The proposed concept of a geometric associative memory introduces the potential to model these associations at varying levels of detail and complexity. A “granular” approach would allow for the representation of basic, pairwise relationships between individual factors such as a specific thought and an associated emotion, or a particular skill and its impact on a health outcome. Extending this to a “long-chained” memory would enable the modeling of more intricate and extended dependencies, where multiple factors are linked together in a sequence or network of relationships. For instance, it could represent how a specific character trait like resilience might influence the development of mental skills, which in turn affect emotional regulation and ultimately impact personalized health over time. This capability to capture associations across different levels of granularity and complexity is particularly relevant for understanding the hierarchical and multi-layered nature of the interrelationships between cognition, emotion, health, skills, and character development. Such an approach could potentially reveal both immediate and distal influences, offering insights into complex developmental trajectories and feedback loops that shape individual differences.

5. The Mathematical Framework: Hyperbolic Geometry, Topology, and Homology

5.1 Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds

A hyperbolic 3-manifold is a three-dimensional space characterized by a constant negative curvature.42 From a topological perspective, such a manifold can often be understood as the result of taking the 3-dimensional hyperbolic space and “quotienting” it by the action of a discrete group of isometries known as a Kleinian group.42 Hyperbolic geometry, while being the least understood among the eight possible geometries in three dimensions, is increasingly recognized for its capacity to model complex networks and hierarchical structures.42 This is particularly relevant in fields like cognitive science and neuroscience, where hierarchical organization is a prominent feature of brain structure and cognitive functions.52 The ability of hyperbolic geometry to efficiently represent data with large-scale hierarchical structures, often outperforming traditional Euclidean models, makes it a promising framework for modeling the intricate relationships between the various factors influencing individual differences.53 For example, the hierarchical development of skills and character traits, where more complex abilities build upon foundational ones, could potentially be well-represented within a hyperbolic geometric space.53

5.2 Metric Topology

Metric topology is a branch of mathematics that focuses on the properties of spaces where a concept of distance, or metric, is defined between any two points.39 This framework provides the tools to define fundamental concepts such as continuity, convergence, and open sets, which are essential for analyzing the structure and relationships within mathematical spaces.58 In the context of understanding individual differences, metric topology offers a way to describe the “space” of these differences based on quantifiable measures. Topological Data Analysis (TDA) is a suite of techniques within metric topology that focuses on uncovering the underlying shape and structure of data, often high-dimensional, by identifying topological features that persist across different scales.58 Persistent homology, a key method in TDA, allows for the identification of robust topological features like connected components and loops, providing insights into the essential structure of complex datasets such as those encountered in personalized health and psychological profiling.58 Furthermore, the concept of metric-topological interaction models highlights the potential for understanding complex systems by considering the interplay between distance-based (metric) and connectivity-based (topological) relationships.63

5.3 Homology

Homology, originating from algebraic topology, is a powerful tool for studying the “holes” and connectivity of topological spaces.40 By examining these topological invariants, homology can reveal fundamental aspects of a space’s structure that are preserved under continuous deformations. While homology has found significant applications in fields like bioinformatics, particularly in homology modeling for protein structure prediction 74, its use in computational models within psychology and neuroscience is emerging.67 Persistent homology, as mentioned earlier, extends the concept of homology by analyzing how these topological features evolve as the scale or resolution of the data changes.67 This robustness to variations in scale makes persistent homology a valuable approach for characterizing the underlying structure of complex data, potentially identifying fundamental patterns of individual differences that are not easily discernible through traditional statistical methods. By focusing on topological features that persist across different levels of granularity, persistent homology can provide a more stable and reliable characterization of the data’s essential organization.

6. Leveraging Insights from Dr. Ethan Kross’s Research

6.1 Focus on Emotion Regulation and Self-Control

The extensive research conducted by Dr. Ethan Kross focuses on understanding how individuals can effectively manage their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors to enhance their overall well-being.82 His work highlights the importance of “emotional shifters,” which are practical strategies individuals can use to alter their emotional states in the moment.83 These shifters encompass a range of techniques, including sensory experiences, mental time travel, and shifts in perspective.83 Dr. Kross’s research emphasizes that emotions, when understood and managed effectively, can serve as valuable signals that guide decision-making and behavior.83 A key aspect of his work involves the concept of “self-distancing,” which suggests that analyzing one’s feelings from a psychologically distanced perspective can facilitate more adaptive self-reflection and better emotion regulation.87 His investigations also explore the interplay between self-talk, social media interactions, and their impact on emotional well-being, as well as the surprising finding of shared neural representations between social rejection and physical pain.82 Overall, Dr. Kross’s findings underscore the dynamic and context-dependent nature of the relationship between thoughts, feelings, and well-being, emphasizing the active role individuals can play in regulating their emotional experiences.

6.2 Potential Connections to Geometric Associative Memory

The proposed geometric associative memory model could offer a novel computational framework for representing the dynamic processes of emotion regulation and self-control highlighted in Dr. Kross’s research. The various “emotional shifters” identified in his work could potentially be modeled as transformations or movements within the geometric space of the associative memory, reflecting their ability to shift an individual’s emotional state. For instance, the concept of “self-distancing” might be computationally represented as a specific type of movement within the hyperbolic space, symbolizing a shift in perspective and its subsequent influence on associated emotions and cognitions. The hierarchical nature of emotional responses and regulatory strategies could potentially be captured by the inherent hierarchical structure of hyperbolic geometry. Furthermore, metric topology and homology could be employed to analyze patterns of emotional states and the transitions between them, potentially revealing individual differences in emotional resilience and the effectiveness of various regulation techniques. The “granular to long-chained” aspect of the memory could allow for the modeling of both immediate emotional responses and the longer-term impact of consistent emotion regulation practices on overall well-being and character development.

7. Potential Benefits and Challenges of the Proposed Model

7.1 Potential Benefits

The proposed geometric associative memory approach holds several potential advantages for understanding individual differences. Its granularity could allow for the capture of fine-grained distinctions in individuals’ cognitive, emotional, health, skill, and character profiles by representing their unique configurations within a high-dimensional geometric space. The underlying mathematical framework offers the potential for scalability, enabling the analysis of large datasets of individual information to identify both common patterns and unique variations across diverse populations. The use of hyperbolic geometry could be particularly beneficial in representing the complex interconnectedness and hierarchical relationships between different factors, offering a more nuanced understanding than linear models. Furthermore, by dynamically modeling an individual’s “life space” as a field within this geometric framework, the model might offer possibilities for forward projection, allowing for predictions of future developmental trajectories and well-being outcomes based on current states and dynamics.

7.2 Challenges

Despite its potential, the proposed model also presents significant challenges. A primary hurdle lies in data representation: effectively translating complex psychological and health data into a meaningful geometric representation within a hyperbolic 3-manifold. Determining the most appropriate features to include and how to map them onto the geometric space would require careful theoretical consideration and empirical validation. The computational complexity of working with hyperbolic 3-manifolds, metric topology, and homology, especially when applied to large-scale datasets, is another significant challenge. Efficient algorithms and substantial computational resources would be necessary to make such a model practically feasible. Interpretability is also a key concern; understanding the meaning of distances, topological features, and movements within the geometric space in terms of concrete psychological and health outcomes could be difficult. Developing intuitive methods for visualizing and interpreting the model’s output would be crucial for its utility. Rigorous model validation against real-world longitudinal data would be essential to ensure the accuracy and predictive power of this complex framework. Finally, the “curse of dimensionality” poses a potential limitation, as representing a wide range of granular individual differences could lead to a very high-dimensional space, potentially requiring sophisticated dimensionality reduction techniques to maintain model tractability and avoid overfitting.

8. Projecting the Unknown-Unknowns

8.1 Limitations of Current Research

Current research, while providing valuable insights into the interplay of cognition, emotion, and other factors, still faces limitations in fully capturing the dynamic and adaptive complexities of human individuality. Many aspects of these interrelationships remain poorly understood, representing significant “unknown-unknowns.” These might include the precise mechanisms of causality between different factors, the emergence of novel skills and character traits over time, and the unpredictable influence of unforeseen environmental or personal events on an individual’s trajectory. Traditional research methods and linear models may struggle to fully account for these non-linear dynamics and emergent phenomena.

8.2 How the Proposed Model Might Help

The proposed geometric associative memory model offers a novel framework that could potentially help address some of these limitations and shed light on the “unknown-unknowns.” By allowing for the representation of intricate, non-linear relationships within a shared geometric space, the model could uncover connections and patterns that might be missed by more conventional approaches. The ability to model individual “life spaces” as dynamic fields within this space could facilitate the identification of subtle anomalies or patterns of connectivity that might indicate previously unknown relationships or developmental pathways. The model’s capacity for granular representation could enable the discovery of previously unmeasured or underappreciated individual differences that play a significant role in shaping outcomes. Furthermore, by incorporating a temporal dimension and modeling the evolution of the geometric representation over time, the model could potentially offer insights into the dynamics of change, the emergence of new phenomena, and the long-term consequences of various interactions. Unexpected topological features or shifts in connectivity within the hyperbolic 3-manifold representing the space of individual differences could serve as indicators of previously unrecognized aspects of human psychology and health, prompting further investigation into their significance.

9. Conclusion and Future Directions

In conclusion, the exploration of field theories and the potential of a granular to long-chained geometric associative memory based on hyperbolic 3-manifolds, metric topology, and homology offers a promising avenue for advancing our understanding of the complex and adaptive nature of individual differences. This approach holds the potential to provide a more granular, scalable, and interconnected representation of the interplay between cognition, emotion, personalized health, skills, and character development. While significant challenges remain in areas such as data representation, computational complexity, and interpretability, the potential benefits for achieving a more precise and scalable understanding of human individuality are substantial.

Future research should focus on developing robust methods for mapping complex psychological and health data onto hyperbolic 3-manifolds and creating efficient computational algorithms for working with such a model at scale. Developing techniques for visualizing and interpreting the model’s output in a psychologically meaningful way will be crucial for translating its mathematical insights into practical understanding. Rigorous validation of the model’s predictive power using longitudinal datasets is essential to establish its utility. Ultimately, exploring the model’s capacity to uncover novel insights and address current “unknown-unknowns” in the field holds the key to unlocking a deeper understanding of the intricate and dynamic nature of individual human beings. This interdisciplinary approach, bridging advanced mathematics with computational psychology and personalized health, has the potential to significantly advance our knowledge of the complex and adaptive inter-relationship spaces that define each unique individual.

Works cited

  1. en.wikipedia.org, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_theory_(psychology)#:~:text=In%20topological%20and%20vector%20psychology,holistic%20perspective%20of%20Gestalt%20theories.
  2. Field theory (psychology) – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_theory_(psychology)
  3. field theory – APA Dictionary of Psychology, accessed April 4, 2025, https://dictionary.apa.org/field-theory
  4. Field Theory • Counselling Tutor, accessed April 4, 2025, https://counsellingtutor.com/counselling-approaches/what-is-gestalt-therapy/field-theory-gestalt-therapy/
  5. What Is Field Theory?1 | American Journal of Sociology: Vol 109, No 1, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/375201
  6. FIELD THEORY: KURT LEWIN (Lecture Series-1), accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.apsmcollege.ac.in/glassimg/thumb_album/1600177748-17.pdf
  7. Kurt Lewin’s field theory | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/kurt-lewins-field-theory
  8. Kurt Lewin’s Field Theory: Biography and Theories – Verywell Mind, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/kurt-lewin-biography-1890-1947-2795540
  9. Field Theory – Emerson Seminars, accessed April 4, 2025, https://emersonbirthrx.com/?p=2204
  10. Field theory | Social Interaction, Cognitive Processes & Group Dynamics | Britannica, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/field-theory-psychology
  11. Gestalt Therapy and Field Theory: Understanding the Individual in Context, accessed April 4, 2025, https://sweetinstitute.com/gestalt-therapy-and-field-theory-understanding-the-individual-in-context/
  12. Personalized Medicine: Motivation, Challenges and Progress – PMC, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6366451/
  13. Personalized medicine – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personalized_medicine
  14. Perspective: Balancing Personalized Medicine and Personalized Care – PMC, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3584182/
  15. The Interconnectedness of Emotion Understanding and Social Cognition – Interpersonal Development in Infancy, accessed April 4, 2025, https://idlab.ucmerced.edu/sites/idlab.ucmerced.edu/files/page/documents/reschke_walle_dukes_2017.pdf
  16. The Evidence Base for How We Learn Supporting Students’ Social, Emotional, and Academic Development – The Aspen Institute, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SEAD-Research-Brief-9.12_updated-web.pdf
  17. Cognition and Emotion: Reviews of Current Research and Theories, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.uv.mx/rmipe/files/2017/12/cognition_and_emotion.pdf
  18. Relationships among cognition, emotion, and motivation: implications for intervention and neuroplasticity in psychopathology – PubMed Central, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3678097/
  19. Physical, social, emotional and cognitive development – FutureLearn, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/supporting-adolescent-learners/0/steps/46451
  20. What is Holistic Development? – HEI Schools, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.heischools.com/blog/what-is-holistic-development
  21. Holism: Definition and Examples – Verywell Mind, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-holism-4685432
  22. A Comprehensive Guide to the Bronfenbrenner Ecological Model – Verywell Mind, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/bronfenbrenner-ecological-model-7643403
  23. 7 Dimensions of Holistic Wellbeing (7DHW): A Theoretical Model – Fortune Journals, accessed April 4, 2025, http://www.fortunejournals.com/articles/7-dimensions-of-holistic-wellbeing-7dhw-a-theoretical-model.html
  24. Introducing ‘holistic psychology’ for life qualities: A theoretical model for consideration – PMC, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7803644/
  25. The CBT Model of Emotions – Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Los Angeles, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cogbtherapy.com/cbt-model-of-emotions
  26. What Is the CASEL Framework?, accessed April 4, 2025, https://casel.org/fundamentals-of-sel/what-is-the-casel-framework/
  27. The shaping Us Framework – understanding the social and emotional skills that matter most – Centre for Early Childhood, accessed April 4, 2025, https://centreforearlychildhood.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Shaping-Us-Framework-Main-Report-for-Web-FINAL-3.pdf
  28. Emotional Intelligence Theories & Components Explained – Positive Psychology, accessed April 4, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/emotional-intelligence-theories/
  29. Emotional Intelligence – Noba Project, accessed April 4, 2025, https://nobaproject.com/modules/emotional-intelligence
  30. Associative memory of structured knowledge – PMC, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9759586/
  31. Mathematical Models For Human Associative Memory: A Survey of Recent Developments, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388195724_Mathematical_Models_For_Human_Associative_Memory_A_Survey_of_Recent_Developments
  32. Dense Associative Memory for Pattern Recognition – Computational Neuroscience Journal Club at Princeton, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pnicompneurojc.github.io/papers/krotov2016.pdf
  33. Associative memory cells and their working principle in the brain. – F1000Research, accessed April 4, 2025, https://f1000research.com/articles/7-108
  34. Associative Memory Study: Architectures and Technology – DTIC, accessed April 4, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA399483.pdf
  35. The associative structure of memory for multi-element events – PubMed, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23915127/
  36. Hippocampal Theta Oscillations Support Successful Associative Memory Formation, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33158958/
  37. Associative memory (psychology) – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associative_memory_(psychology)
  38. Within-category similarity negatively affects associative memory performance in both younger and older adults – PubMed Central, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9991946/
  39. Multiscale and Extended Retrieval of Associative Memory Structures in a Cortical Model of Local-Global Inhibition Balance – PubMed Central, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9186110/
  40. [1606.01164] Dense Associative Memory for Pattern Recognition – arXiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01164
  41. Basic Associative Neural Memory Models, accessed April 4, 2025, https://neuron.eng.wayne.edu/tarek/MITbook/chap7/7_1.html
  42. Hyperbolic 3-manifold – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_3-manifold
  43. hyperbolic 3-manifold in nLab, accessed April 4, 2025, https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/hyperbolic+3-manifold
  44. What are the applications of hyperbolic 3-manifold theory to cosmology?, accessed April 4, 2025, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/296932/what-are-the-applications-of-hyperbolic-3-manifold-theory-to-cosmology
  45. Covering theorems for hyperbolic 3-manifolds – Mathematics, accessed April 4, 2025, https://dept.math.lsa.umich.edu/~canary/Tenn.pdf
  46. Free Kleinian groups and volumes of hyperbolic 3-manifolds – Marc Culler, accessed April 4, 2025, https://marc-culler.info/static/home/papers/FreeKleinian.pdf
  47. Virtual properties of 3-manifolds – UC Berkeley math, accessed April 4, 2025, https://math.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/bulk_9/virtualspecialICM.pdf
  48. William P. Thurston The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds – UNL Math, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.math.unl.edu/~jkettinger2/thurston.pdf
  49. Hyperbolic Geometry and 3-Manifold Topology – Math (Princeton), accessed April 4, 2025, https://web.math.princeton.edu/facultypapers/Gabai/PCMI%20Notes.pdf
  50. An overview of 3-manifold topology – Ian Agol – YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_xErJctCYw
  51. Introduction to hyperbolic 3-manifolds and ideas of quantitative Mostow Rigidity – YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMJ1QpDG5vE
  52. arxiv.org, accessed April 4, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.12990v1#:~:text=Research%20has%20demonstrated%20that%20hyperbolic,especially%20those%20involving%20hierarchical%20processes.
  53. Brain-Inspired AI with Hyperbolic Geometry – arXiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.12990v3
  54. Navigating Memorability Landscapes: Hyperbolic Geometry Reveals Hierarchical Structures in Object Concept Memory | bioRxiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.22.614329v1.full
  55. HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY AND ITS APPLICATIONS – IJRAR.org, accessed April 4, 2025, http://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR19D5346.pdf
  56. Hyperbolic Brain Representations – arXiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.12990v1
  57. Navigating Memorability Landscapes: Hyperbolic Geometry Reveals Hierarchical Structures in Object Concept Memory – bioRxiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.22.614329v1.full.pdf
  58. Topology – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology
  59. Metric space – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_space
  60. Metric Space Topology | Series on Analysis, Applications and Computation – World Scientific Publishing, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/13160
  61. On (?, ?)-Metric Spaces with Applications – MDPI, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/9/1459
  62. [QUESTION] Metric spaces, continuity, and what the heck the point (heh) of topology is?, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/topology/comments/s0tpya/question_metric_spaces_continuity_and_what_the/
  63. Metric–topological interaction model of collective behavior | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251562328_Metric-topological_interaction_model_of_collective_behavior
  64. Self-organizing map – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-organizing_map
  65. Statistical Neurodynamics of Associative Memory, accessed April 4, 2025, https://bsi-ni.brain.riken.jp/database/file/111/108.pdf
  66. Topological Deep Learning with State-Space Models: A Mamba Approach for Simplicial Complexes – arXiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.12033v1
  67. The topology and geometry of neural representations – PNAS, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2317881121
  68. The topology and geometry of neural representations – PubMed, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39374397/
  69. Topology and Geometry in Neuroscience – ICERM – Brown University, accessed April 4, 2025, https://icerm.brown.edu/program/semester_program_workshop/sp-f23-w2
  70. The Gestalt Computational Model – arXiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2405.20583v1
  71. The topology and geometry of neural representations | PNAS, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2317881121
  72. The topology and geometry of neural representations – Visual Inference Lab – Columbia University, accessed April 4, 2025, https://kriegeskortelab.zuckermaninstitute.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/lin-kriegeskorte-2024-the-topology-and-geometry-of-neural-representations.pdf
  73. Probing Individual Differences in the Topological Landscape of Naturalistic Brain Dynamics – bioRxiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.20.599966v2.full.pdf
  74. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3507339/#:~:text=There%20are%20several%20other%20common,of%20a%20given%20binding%20site%3B%20(
  75. Homology Modeling- Definition, Steps, Diagram, Uses – Microbe Notes, accessed April 4, 2025, https://microbenotes.com/homology-modeling/
  76. Homology modeling | Bioinformatics Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed April 4, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/bioinformatics/unit-5/homology-modeling/study-guide/g4pE4obUhy0xu1RX
  77. Overview of 5 Popular Homology Modeling Software Tools: A Comparative Analysis, accessed April 4, 2025, https://parssilico.com/blogs/102-5-popular-homology-modeling-software
  78. Homology modeling in the time of collective and artificial intelligence – PMC, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7695898/
  79. Homology modeling – Wikipedia, accessed April 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homology_modeling
  80. Associative Memory Hamiltonians for Structure Prediction without Homology: α/β Proteins – Florida Atlantic University Libraries, accessed April 4, 2025, https://fau-flvc.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_journals_201352515&context=PC&vid=01FALSC_FAU:FAU&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&query=null%2C%2CJapanese&facet=citing%2Cexact%2Ccdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-7734e08178804fed7b6b22d53a7267450aec09e8f9d256e434af08beb14e62493&offset=20
  81. Functional segregation of rostral and caudal hippocampus in associative memory – Frontiers, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1509163/full
  82. Ethan Kross | Michigan Ross, accessed April 4, 2025, https://michiganross.umich.edu/faculty-research/faculty/ethan-kross
  83. Ethan Kross on How to Make Emotions Work for You – PassionStruck, accessed April 4, 2025, https://passionstruck.com/ethan-kross-on-how-to-make-emotions-work-for-you/
  84. Leading Neuroscientist: Turn Anxiety and Anger Into Peace and Power | Ethan Kross, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.goodlifeproject.com/podcast/leading-neuroscientist-turn-anxiety-and-anger-into-peace-and-power-ethan-kross/
  85. The Science of Managing Emotions with Author Ethan Kross – Lisa Damour, PhD, accessed April 4, 2025, https://drlisadamour.com/resource/the-science-of-managing-emotions-with-author-ethan-kross/
  86. I’m Ethan Kross, author of “SHIFT: Managing Your Emotions—So They Don’t Manage You” and “Chatter.” AMA! – Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1igwf2b/im_ethan_kross_author_of_shift_managing_your/
  87. Kross,Ethan F | Institute for Social Research – University of Michigan, accessed April 4, 2025, https://isr.umich.edu/about/faculty-profiles/krossethan-f/
  88. ‪Ethan Kross‬ – ‪Google Scholar‬, accessed April 4, 2025, https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=lA9EX54AAAAJ&hl=en
  89. Self-Reflection at Work: Why It Matters and How to Harness Its Potential and Avoid Its Pitfalls, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031921-024406
  90. Placebos without deception reduce self-report and neural measures of emotional distress, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7391658/
  91. Sensory emotion regulation – PubMed, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36805103/
  92. When the self becomes other: toward an integrative understanding of the processes distinguishing adaptive self-reflection from rumination – PubMed, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19580550/
  93. An everyday activity as a treatment for depression: the benefits of expressive writing for people diagnosed with major depressive disorder – PubMed, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23790815/
  94. Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain – PubMed, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21444827/

Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21728454/