The Converging Frontiers of In Vivo Sensing, AI, and Societal Design: Towards Real-Time Understanding of Human States

Co-developed by the Catalyzer Think Tank divergent thinking and Gemini Deep Research tool.

Introduction: The Confluence of Sensing, AI, and Societal Vision for Deep Human Understanding

Humanity stands at the precipice of a potential paradigm shift in understanding its own internal landscape. This shift is driven by the accelerating convergence of three powerful forces: the development of increasingly sophisticated in vivo sensing technologies capable of monitoring biological processes in real-time; the maturation of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) techniques designed to fuse and interpret vast streams of complex, heterogeneous data; and the articulation of ambitious societal blueprints, such as Japan’s Society 5.0 initiative, which explicitly aim to leverage technology for deeper insights into human thoughts, feelings, beliefs, and actions. The prospect emerges of moving beyond static snapshots or subjective self-reports towards a dynamic, data-driven comprehension of the human condition.

This report delves into the core questions arising from this confluence. What types of sensors—ranging from commercially available wearables to theoretical nanorobots and quantum devices—exist or are emerging to probe the body’s intricate signaling networks? How reliably can the signals captured from the autonomic nervous system, the circulatory system, or directly from neural activity be correlated with complex, subjective human states, and what are the inherent scientific and practical limitations? How are national strategic initiatives, particularly Japan’s Moonshot Research and Development Program, actively driving progress in these domains, aligning technological development with specific societal goals like the creation of a “super smart society”? Furthermore, what novel AI architectures, such as those employing relational frameworks, hyperbolic geometry, or specialized memory systems, are being proposed to integrate the diverse, noisy, and often incomplete data streams generated by these sensors into a unified, meaningful representation—a “global lens” reflecting individual state in relation to specific triggers?

Addressing these questions requires a synthesis of knowledge across disparate fields, from neurobiology and materials science to AI research and socio-ethical analysis. This report aims to provide such a synthesis, exploring the “why, what, and how” of this technological trajectory. It will navigate the landscape of sensing technologies, examine the scientific basis and challenges of decoding human experience from biological signals, place these developments within the strategic context of Japan’s Society 5.0 and Moonshot programs, analyze the AI methodologies proposed for data integration, and finally, offer an integrated perspective on the potential pathways, transformative possibilities, and profound challenges—technical, scientific, ethical, and societal—that lie ahead. The objective is to furnish a comprehensive, expert-level analysis for those seeking to understand the foundations, frontiers, and far-reaching implications of this quest for deep human understanding in the era of advanced technology.

Section 1: Sensing the Inner World: Technologies for Real-Time In Vivo Monitoring

The endeavor to understand human thoughts, feelings, actions, and beliefs through technological means fundamentally relies on the ability to access and interpret relevant biological signals in vivo. This requires targeting key physiological systems and deploying sensor technologies capable of capturing their dynamic activity in real-time. The range of potential sensors is vast, spanning from non-invasive wearables to highly advanced, often experimental, implantable, nanoscale, and even quantum-based devices.

1.1 The Physiological Landscape: Target Systems for Understanding Human State

To capture signals indicative of internal states, researchers and technologists primarily focus on three interconnected physiological systems: the Autonomic Nervous System, the Circulatory System, and the Central/Peripheral Nervous Systems.

The Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) operates largely below conscious control, regulating vital functions essential for survival and adaptation.1 It comprises two main branches with often opposing effects: the Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS), responsible for the “fight-or-flight” response mobilizing the body for action under stress or perceived threat (triggering norepinephrine/epinephrine release, increasing heart rate and blood pressure) 3, and the Parasympathetic Nervous System (PNS), governing the “rest-and-digest” state, promoting relaxation, energy conservation, and recovery (e.g., lowering heart rate via vagus nerve activity).1 The dynamic balance, or homeostasis, between SNS and PNS activity is crucial for health.2 Disruptions in this balance are strongly linked to stress responses, involving the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and various disease states, including cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, and potentially affective disorders.3 The ANS also plays a role in modulating inflammation, notably via the vagus nerve’s anti-inflammatory pathway.1 Measuring ANS activity, often indirectly through its effects on target organs, provides a window into arousal, stress, relaxation, and regulatory capacity.

The Circulatory System (Blood Network) serves as the body’s transport network, carrying oxygen, nutrients, hormones, immune cells, and various biomarkers. Its state reflects both metabolic demands and ANS control. Key measurable parameters relevant to internal states include blood pressure, heart rate, and subtle changes in blood volume in peripheral tissues, which can be detected optically (photoplethysmography, PPG).4 Furthermore, the blood carries molecular messengers, such as stress hormones (e.g., cortisol from the HPA axis) and neurotransmitters (like dopamine, which acts both in the brain and peripherally, influencing cardiovascular function and metabolism).3 Analyzing blood composition for specific biomarkers offers direct chemical information about physiological and potentially psychological states.13

The Central Nervous System (CNS) (brain and spinal cord) and Peripheral Nervous System (PNS) (nerves extending throughout the body) are responsible for processing information, generating thoughts, emotions, and intentions, controlling voluntary actions, and relaying sensory information.4 The CNS exerts top-down control over the ANS, modulating physiological responses based on cognitive appraisals and emotional states.12 Neural signals, representing the electrical and chemical communication between neurons, are the most direct correlates of cognitive and affective processes. Accessing these signals can be achieved non-invasively through scalp electroencephalography (EEG) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), or invasively via implanted electrodes.18 The PNS includes sensory nerves that convey information from the body (interoception) and skin to the CNS, as well as motor and autonomic nerves.15

A critical understanding emerging from neurobiology is the profound interconnectedness of these systems.2 Cognitive or emotional events processed in the CNS trigger downstream responses in the ANS.17 ANS activation directly alters cardiovascular parameters like heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), and blood pressure, measurable via ECG, PPG, or cuffs.1 The ANS and HPA axis influence the release of hormones and neurotransmitters into the bloodstream.3 Inflammatory processes can be modulated by the ANS (particularly the vagus nerve) and can also influence CNS function.1 Therefore, a change originating in one domain—a stressful thought (CNS), for example—will likely propagate signals across the others, manifesting as altered HRV (ANS/Cardiovascular), elevated stress hormones (Circulatory/Endocrine), and perhaps even modified inflammatory markers. This intricate interplay necessitates a multi-system sensing approach to gain a holistic understanding of an individual’s internal state; relying on signals from a single system provides only a partial and potentially misleading picture.

1.2 Current Frontiers: Wearable and Minimally Invasive Biosensors

The most visible advancements in physiological monitoring have occurred in the realm of wearable sensors, which have transitioned from specialized medical devices to mainstream consumer electronics.3 These devices offer the advantage of continuous or frequent data collection in everyday environments, outside the constraints of a laboratory or clinic.3

• Electrocardiography (ECG)-based Sensors: Typically integrated into chest straps, patches, or specialized watches, ECG sensors measure the heart’s electrical activity with high fidelity. They are the gold standard for calculating Heart Rate (HR) and, crucially, Heart Rate Variability (HRV), a sensitive indicator of ANS balance.3 ECG can also detect other cardiac changes potentially linked to stress.3 Their status is largely Commercial and Applied Research.
• Photoplethysmography (PPG)-based Sensors: These optical sensors, common in smartwatches, rings, and fitness trackers, detect changes in blood volume in peripheral tissues (like the wrist) by measuring reflected or transmitted light.10 From this, HR can be estimated, and HRV can be derived, although typically with lower accuracy than ECG, especially during movement.3 PPG can also provide estimates of blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) and potentially blood pressure.10 Their convenience has led to widespread Commercial adoption and use in Applied Research.
• Electrodermal Activity (EDA) / Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) Sensors: Often found in wristbands or finger sensors, these measure changes in the skin’s electrical conductance, which is directly modulated by sweat gland activity under SNS control.3 EDA provides a relatively direct measure of sympathetic arousal and is a common feature in stress monitoring research and some Commercial devices.
• Other Wearables: Complementary data comes from respiration sensors (often integrated into chest straps or derived from ECG/PPG signals), which track breathing rate and patterns influenced by the ANS 3; skin temperature (ST) sensors, reflecting changes in peripheral blood flow 3; accelerometers (ACC) and gyroscopes, primarily for tracking physical activity and posture, which is crucial context for interpreting other physiological signals 3; and occasionally electromyography (EMG) sensors for measuring muscle tension associated with stress.3 These range from Commercial to Applied Research.

The primary advantage of these wearable technologies lies in their non-invasiveness, user-friendliness, and ability to facilitate continuous, longitudinal monitoring in naturalistic settings.3 This capability enables real-time feedback for personalized health management, stress awareness, and lifestyle interventions.3 However, significant challenges remain. The accuracy and reliability of data, particularly from PPG-based HRV and during physical activity, can be compromised by motion artifacts and sensor placement.3 Ensuring the privacy and security of the sensitive physiological data collected is a major concern.3 Furthermore, interpreting these signals in the context of complex human states requires sophisticated analysis and careful consideration of confounding factors like physical exertion, health status, and environmental conditions.3

The proliferation of wearables signifies a democratization of physiological monitoring, shifting data collection from controlled laboratory environments to the complexities of daily life.3 This opens avenues for large-scale population studies and personalized wellness applications. However, it is crucial to recognize that these devices primarily capture peripheral manifestations of physiological processes, mainly reflecting ANS activity and cardiovascular function.3 They offer an indirect and often noisy view of the deeper central nervous system activity or specific biochemical events that underpin thoughts, nuanced emotions, or specific disease processes. While valuable for tracking longitudinal trends, general arousal levels, and overall regulatory function, their ability to decode specific, moment-to-moment complex internal states is limited by this indirectness and the inherent signal quality challenges. Their strength lies more in continuous tracking and pattern detection than in high-fidelity, specific state decoding.

1.3 Deep Dive: Implantable, Nanoscale, and Biological Sensors

Moving beyond the skin surface, a diverse range of sensor technologies are being developed to operate in vivo, offering closer proximity to target signals and the potential for greater specificity. These are largely in the Research, Trials, or Theoretical stages.

• Implantable Biosensors: These devices are surgically placed within the body for extended periods, enabling direct and continuous monitoring of specific physiological parameters or biomarkers in tissue or bodily fluids.25 Examples include continuous glucose monitors for diabetes management. Future applications might involve sensors for neurotransmitters, hormones, or inflammatory markers.28 Key challenges include ensuring long-term biocompatibility, preventing biofouling, providing stable power, enabling reliable data transmission, and managing the risks associated with implantation and removal.28 Advances in organic bioelectronics, using materials with properties closer to biological tissue, aim to improve integration and reduce foreign body response.19
• Electrochemical Sensors: This category focuses on detecting specific molecules by measuring electrical signals (current or voltage) generated during electrochemical reactions at a sensor surface.11 Techniques like voltammetry and amperometry are employed, often enhanced by the use of nanomaterials.11 Carbon-based materials (nanotubes, graphene), metal nanoparticles (gold, platinum), conductive polymers, and metal oxides provide high surface area, catalytic activity, and improved biocompatibility, boosting sensor sensitivity and selectivity.11 Research actively explores their use for detecting neurotransmitters like dopamine in vivo (e.g., in the brain via microprobes) or in biological fluids for diagnostic purposes.11 While promising for targeted molecular detection, achieving stable, selective, real-time in vivo performance remains a significant research challenge.
• Nanoparticle-based Probes and Sensors: This approach utilizes engineered nanoparticles as sensing elements.29 Quantum dots (QDs), gold nanoparticles, or specially designed polymer nanoparticles (like dendrimers) can be functionalized to interact with specific analytes (ions like Ca2+, enzymes, pH changes, specific biomolecules).29 Detection often relies on changes in the nanoparticles’ optical properties (e.g., fluorescence, Förster Resonance Energy Transfer – FRET) or other measurable characteristics upon target binding.29 Their small size allows for potential intracellular or interstitial sensing.29 Nanoparticle-based delivery systems are also being developed to help sensors or therapeutics cross biological barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), often via intrathecal (IT) administration.30 This field is primarily in the Research phase.
• Neuralnanorobotics: This represents a highly futuristic and currently theoretical concept involving microscopic, potentially autonomous robots designed to navigate complex biological environments like the brain.31 Envisioned capabilities include monitoring and recording electrical activity at the single-neuron or synapse level, detecting local biochemical changes, interacting with neural circuits, and wirelessly transmitting vast amounts of data to external computers or cloud systems.31 Potential applications span diagnostics, targeted therapies, and even human cognitive enhancement.31 While conceptually intriguing, the technological hurdles (miniaturization, propulsion, power, control, biocompatibility, data transmission) are immense, placing this firmly in the realm of long-term, speculative Research and Development.31
• Biohybrid and Bioengineered Sensors: These sensors gain specificity by incorporating biological recognition elements.25 Enzymes are used in well-established glucose sensors.25 Antibodies or aptamers (nucleic acid-based) can be employed to bind specific proteins or molecules.25 Genetically engineered proteins, such as fluorescent reporters that change brightness in response to calcium influx or voltage changes, are powerful tools in basic neuroscience research, allowing visualization of neural activity in living cells or organisms.29 The development status ranges from Commercial (glucose sensors) to active Research for newer applications.

The progression from non-invasive wearables towards these more advanced in vivo sensors reflects a fundamental trade-off. The allure of implantable, nanoscale, and biological sensors lies in their potential for vastly improved specificity—targeting particular molecules like dopamine 11 or specific cellular events 29—and unparalleled proximity to the signal source, such as within the brain parenchyma or directly interacting with cells.11 This direct access promises data far richer and less confounded than peripheral measurements. However, this potential comes inextricably linked with increased invasiveness, ranging from minimally invasive injections or microprobes to surgical implantation.11 This raises significant challenges related to biocompatibility (avoiding immune rejection and tissue damage), long-term stability and function within the harsh biological environment, reliable power sources for active devices, secure data transmission from within the body, and profound ethical considerations regarding safety, autonomy, and privacy.19 While nanorobotics capture the imagination, their practical realization for complex in vivo tasks remains a distant prospect.31 Thus, the pursuit of deeper, more specific internal sensing currently navigates a complex landscape balancing potential insight against practical and ethical barriers.

1.4 The Quantum Leap?: Exploring Quantum Sensing for Biological Systems

A distinct and potentially revolutionary frontier in sensing involves harnessing the principles of quantum mechanics to achieve measurements with unprecedented sensitivity and resolution.33 Quantum sensors leverage phenomena like superposition and entanglement, operating based on discrete quantum states.

Several platforms are being actively investigated for biological applications:

• Quantum Light Sources: Classical light sources are limited by shot noise, an intrinsic fluctuation due to the discrete nature of photons. Quantum optics offers ways to overcome this limit using non-classical states of light, such as squeezed states or N00N states.33 These states exhibit reduced noise in certain properties (like amplitude or phase) below the shot noise level. Exploiting quantum light allows for enhanced sensitivity in measurements, particularly phase measurements relevant for microscopy and refractometry, potentially enabling higher resolution imaging or detection of subtle changes in biological samples using lower, less damaging light intensities.33 This technology is currently in the Research stage.
• Color Centers in Diamond: Certain atomic defects within the diamond crystal lattice, notably Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV) centers and Silicon-Vacancy (SiV) centers, possess quantum spin states that are highly sensitive to their local environment.33 Changes in magnetic fields, electric fields, temperature, or strain can perturb these spin states, and these perturbations can be read out optically (optically detected magnetic resonance, ODMR).33 NV centers are particularly well-studied and offer remarkable sensitivity, nanoscale spatial resolution (when using single NV centers in nanodiamonds), and the ability to operate under ambient conditions (room temperature and pressure).35 Diamond itself is largely biocompatible, making nanodiamonds containing NV centers attractive candidates for in vivo or even intracellular probes.33 Potential applications include highly localized thermometry within cells, mapping weak magnetic fields (potentially those generated by neural activity), pH sensing, and detecting specific molecules through hybrid approaches where the target analyte influences the local magnetic environment of the NV center.33 This area is undergoing rapid Research and development.
• Molecular Quantum Sensors: This approach involves designing and synthesizing specific molecules that possess robust quantum properties, such as long-lasting quantum coherence.37 By tailoring the molecular structure and its chemical environment, researchers aim to create sensors with tunable sensitivity to specific targets and controllable proximity, potentially offering chemical specificity combined with quantum sensitivity.37 This field is in the Early Research stages.

The promise of quantum sensing lies in its potential to push measurement capabilities beyond the limits of classical physics.33 This could enable the detection of previously inaccessible biological signals, such as the extremely weak magnetic fields produced by neural currents, or the monitoring of processes like temperature gradients or ion fluxes at the subcellular level with high precision.33 The biocompatibility and room-temperature operation of NV centers are particularly advantageous for biological applications.35

However, translating the exquisite sensitivity demonstrated in controlled laboratory settings into reliable measurements within the complex, noisy, and dynamic environment of a living organism presents formidable challenges.33 Maintaining quantum coherence, the delicate property underpinning quantum sensing, is difficult in the warm, wet, and chemically diverse biological milieu. Targeted delivery, precise localization, and stable orientation of nanoscale quantum sensors (like nanodiamonds) in vivo are significant hurdles. Furthermore, developing robust methods for initializing the quantum state and reading out the sensing signal from deep within tissue remains challenging. Consequently, while quantum sensors represent a potential paradigm shift for biological measurement, offering glimpses of phenomena invisible to classical tools, their near-term impact is more likely to be in advancing fundamental research capabilities rather than enabling widespread clinical or consumer sensing applications. The gap between theoretical potential and practical in vivo utility is still substantial.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of In Vivo Sensor Modalities

Sensor Modality	Primary Target Signals	Development Status	Key Advantages	Key Challenges/Limitations
Wearable ECG	Heart Electrical Activity (HR, HRV)	Commercial, Applied Research	Non-invasive, High HRV fidelity, Continuous	Electrode contact, Comfort, Limited scope beyond cardiac
Wearable PPG	Blood Volume Pulse (HR, HRV est.), SpO2, BP (est.)	Commercial, Applied Research	Non-invasive, Convenient (wrist, ring), Multi-parameter	Lower HRV accuracy, Motion artifacts, Skin perfusion effects
Wearable EDA/GSR	Skin Conductance (SNS Arousal)	Commercial, Applied Research	Non-invasive, Direct SNS correlate, Simple	Affected by hydration/temp, Motion artifacts, Specificity low for discrete emotions
Implantable Electrochemical	Specific Neurotransmitters (e.g., Dopamine), Biomarkers	Research, Early Clinical	High chemical specificity, Direct in vivo access, Continuous potential	Invasiveness, Biocompatibility, Biofouling, Stability, Calibration, Power
Nanoparticle Probes (e.g., QD-FRET)	Specific Ions (Ca2+), Enzymes, pH, Biomolecules	Research	High specificity, Potential intracellular access, Optical readout	Delivery, Localization, Biocompatibility, Toxicity, Signal penetration, Stability
Neuralnanorobots	Neural Electrical/Chemical Activity (Synaptic level)	Theoretical	Unprecedented resolution/access (envisioned), Multi-modal sensing (envisioned)	Highly speculative, Immense technical hurdles (power, control, navigation, biocompatibility, data), Ethical concerns
Quantum NV Centers (Nanodiamonds)	Temperature, Magnetic Field, Electric Field, Strain, pH (hybrid)	Research	Ultra-sensitive, Nanoscale resolution, Biocompatible (diamond), Room temp. op.	Maintaining coherence in vivo, Delivery/Localization, Readout depth, Converting bio-signals to detectable fields
Quantum Light Sensing	Optical Phase Shifts, Refractive Index Changes	Research	Surpasses shot noise, High sensitivity/resolution with low light intensity	Generating/detecting quantum light states, Fragility, Integration with biological systems
Biohybrid/Bioengineered Sensors	Specific Targets (Glucose, Proteins, DNA) via Bio-recognition	Research to Commercial	High specificity (biological lock-and-key), Diverse targets	Stability of biological element, Biocompatibility, Response time, Integration

Table 1 provides a summarized comparison based on information synthesized from sources including.3 Status reflects the general state, though specific applications may vary.

Section 2: Bridging Signals and States: Decoding Human Experience

Possessing the technology to sense physiological signals in vivo is only the first step. The ultimate goal articulated in the user query—capturing principal components of how people think, feel, act, and believe—requires bridging the gap between these objective, measurable signals and the subjective, complex internal states they purportedly reflect. This involves understanding the scientific basis for these correlations, acknowledging the significant limitations and challenges in decoding, and grappling with the profound ethical implications of attempting to “read” internal states.

2.1 From Autonomic Signals to Affect and Cognition

Wearable sensors commonly target signals reflecting ANS activity, providing a non-invasive window into the body’s regulatory state. Considerable research has explored the links between these signals and psychological states:

• Heart Rate Variability (HRV): As a measure of the beat-to-beat fluctuations in heart rate, HRV reflects the dynamic interplay between the SNS and PNS (sympathovagal balance).1 A large body of evidence suggests that reduced HRV is often associated with negative states, including acute stress, chronic stress, negative affect (mood and emotions), increased morbidity, and affective disorders like depression.7 Conversely, higher HRV is generally linked to positive states and adaptive functioning, including better health, greater physiological and emotional flexibility, enhanced emotional regulation, increased capacity for sympathy, better social cognitive skills (like recognizing emotions in others), and superior cognitive performance, particularly executive functions, even under stressful conditions.7 The theoretical underpinning for the cognition link often draws from the neurovisceral integration model, which posits overlapping neural circuits in the brain (particularly prefrontal cortex) that regulate both cognitive control and parasympathetic activity.17
• Electrodermal Activity (EDA): EDA, or skin conductance, provides a relatively direct measure of SNS arousal because the eccrine sweat glands responsible for its changes are primarily innervated by the sympathetic nervous system.3 Increases in EDA reliably correlate with heightened emotional arousal, stress responses, and cognitive load.3 Some studies suggest EDA patterns might help differentiate between certain high-arousal emotions (e.g., fear vs. anger) or cognitive states (e.g., conflict detection).18
• Other ANS Correlates: Changes in respiration rate and depth (faster, shallower breathing with SNS activation; slower, deeper with PNS) and peripheral skin temperature (vasoconstriction under stress can lower temperature) are also modulated by the ANS and can provide complementary information about arousal and stress levels.3

Despite these established correlations, interpreting ANS signals as direct readouts of specific thoughts, feelings, or beliefs is fraught with difficulty. A major limitation is the lack of specificity: while HRV and EDA indicate levels of arousal or stress, they do not uniquely map onto discrete emotions like joy, sadness, or specific cognitive content.7 Walter Cannon’s early critique of the James-Lange theory of emotion highlighted that ANS patterns might be too slow and undifferentiated to account for the rich variety of emotional experience.18 Furthermore, these signals are highly sensitive to confounding factors unrelated to the internal state of interest, including physical activity, posture, age, fitness level, caffeine intake, time of day, and underlying health conditions.18 The relationship between ANS activity and psychological states can also be complex and non-linear, varying significantly across individuals and contexts.7

Therefore, while ANS-derived signals like HRV and EDA are undeniably valuable, they function as probabilistic indicators rather than deterministic decoders. They offer insights into general dimensions of experience, such as arousal level (high/low), affective valence (positive/negative tendencies), stress load, and an individual’s capacity for self-regulation.7 Decreased HRV, for instance, doesn’t definitively mean someone is experiencing negative emotions, but it increases the probability or indicates a state less conducive to adaptive emotional responding. Their primary strength lies in tracking overall physiological state changes, stress responses, and regulatory function over time, rather than providing a high-fidelity, real-time decoding of specific, nuanced mental content.

2.2 Biochemical Clues: Neurotransmitters and Biomarkers

Another avenue for inferring internal states involves sensing specific molecules—neurotransmitters, hormones, metabolites—circulating in the body or present in specific tissues like the brain.

• Neurotransmitters: Detecting neurotransmitters in vivo offers the potential to probe the activity of specific neural pathways associated with particular functions or states. Dopamine (DA) is a key example, playing crucial roles in motivation, reward processing, learning, movement control, attention, emotional responses, and stress modulation.11 Aberrant dopamine signaling is implicated in major neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and addiction.11 Research is actively exploring the use of advanced electrochemical sensors, often enhanced with nanomaterials for improved sensitivity and selectivity, to measure dopamine concentrations in real-time, potentially within the brain using microelectrodes or in peripheral fluids.11
• Other Biomarkers: Beyond neurotransmitters, other molecules serve as indicators of physiological and potentially psychological states. Hormones associated with the stress response, such as cortisol released via the HPA axis, are well-established stress markers.3 Metabolites like glucose provide information about energy balance and metabolic state, with continuous glucose monitoring being a prime example of successful in vivo biosensing.25 Inflammatory markers (e.g., cytokines) can reflect immune system activity, which is increasingly recognized as interacting with brain function and mental health.1 Biosensors targeting these various biomarkers are under development, often integrating biological recognition elements (enzymes, antibodies) for specificity.13 AI and machine learning are being applied to analyze data from these sensors for improved diagnostics and health monitoring.13

The primary advantage of biomarker sensing is its potential for high chemical specificity.11 Measuring dopamine levels directly provides more targeted information about dopaminergic pathway activity than inferring it indirectly from HRV changes. This specificity could enable more precise diagnostics for diseases linked to specific molecular imbalances or offer deeper insights into the neurochemical basis of behavior and mental states.11

However, realizing this potential faces significant technical hurdles. Achieving reliable, continuous, real-time measurement of low-concentration biomarkers in vivo is exceptionally challenging, especially for neurotransmitters within the complex chemical environment of the brain.11 It requires highly sensitive, selective, and stable sensors, often involving invasive or minimally invasive procedures (e.g., microdialysis probes, implanted sensors).11 Issues of biocompatibility, sensor drift, calibration, and potential tissue damage must be addressed.28 Consequently, while biomarker sensing offers a more targeted view compared to peripheral ANS signals, the technical demands currently limit its widespread application for continuous, real-time monitoring of broad internal states in humans outside specific clinical or research contexts.

2.3 Listening to the Brain: Decoding Neural Activity (EEG, fMRI, BCI)

To access information closer to the source of thoughts, feelings, and intentions, researchers employ neuroimaging and brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies that measure brain activity directly.

• Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): fMRI detects changes in blood oxygen levels (BOLD signal) that correlate with neural activity.20 Its strength lies in its high spatial resolution, allowing researchers to pinpoint activity in specific brain regions, including deep structures.20 fMRI studies have demonstrated the ability to decode various mental states, including visual perception (even reconstructing seen images), memory retrieval, semantic knowledge, emotional responses, dream content, inner speech, and intentions.20 However, fMRI suffers from low temporal resolution (measuring changes over seconds) and requires large, expensive, immobile equipment, restricting its use to laboratory settings.20
• Electroencephalography (EEG): EEG records electrical activity generated by synchronous firing of large neuronal populations via electrodes placed on the scalp.21 Its key advantages are excellent temporal resolution (milliseconds), non-invasiveness, relatively low cost, and portability.21 These features make EEG the workhorse for many BCI applications, including controlling external devices through motor imagery (imagining movement), communication systems based on event-related potentials (ERPs) or steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), emotion recognition, and decoding covert or imagined speech.21 However, EEG signals have low spatial resolution due to volume conduction through the skull and scalp, making it difficult to precisely localize activity sources, especially deep ones.21 EEG signals also have a notoriously low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and are highly susceptible to contamination by artifacts from muscle movements (EMG), eye blinks (EOG), and environmental electrical noise.21 Sophisticated signal processing and machine learning techniques, particularly deep learning models incorporating attention mechanisms, are essential for extracting meaningful information and decoding intentions or states from complex EEG data.21
• Invasive BCI (ECoG, Microelectrodes): For higher fidelity signals, electrodes can be placed directly on the surface of the brain (electrocorticography, ECoG) or implanted within the brain tissue to record from small groups of neurons or even single units (microelectrode arrays).19 These invasive methods offer vastly superior signal quality, with higher SNR, better spatial resolution, and access to a broader frequency range compared to EEG.22 This enables more precise decoding of neural activity, leading to breakthroughs in restoring communication (e.g., speech synthesis from neural signals) and motor control (e.g., controlling robotic limbs) for individuals with severe paralysis.22 However, these approaches carry significant risks associated with brain surgery, potential infection, inflammation, scar tissue formation, and long-term implant stability.22 Their use is currently limited to clinical research and therapeutic applications for specific patient populations.

The capabilities for decoding information from neural signals are advancing rapidly, fueled by progress in both recording technologies and AI algorithms.20 Researchers can now decode not only simple sensory inputs or motor commands but also increasingly complex internal states, including aspects of visual imagery, imagined speech, emotional categories, and even reconstruct perceived stimuli like images or spoken words from brain activity.20

This progress inevitably raises profound ethical concerns, often sensationalized under the term “mind reading”.51 The potential to access and interpret neural correlates of internal mental states touches upon fundamental issues of mental privacy, autonomy, and the potential for manipulation.22 Could thoughts be accessed without consent? Could inferred emotional states be used to influence behavior? While current technology is far from reading the full richness of subjective experience or complex beliefs 51, the trajectory of development necessitates urgent and proactive ethical deliberation. It’s crucial to distinguish between decoding specific neural correlates associated with a mental process (e.g., activity in visual cortex when seeing an image) and accessing the subjective content or “qualia” of that experience (what it feels like to see the image).51 Current methods primarily achieve the former, decoding identifiable patterns linked to tasks or stimuli.20 However, the increasing sophistication of AI in interpreting these patterns, combined with the potential for future technological advancements, underscores the validity of concerns about mental privacy and the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide research and application in this sensitive domain.40

2.4 The Complexity Challenge: Mapping Signals to Subjective Experience

Synthesizing across these different sensing modalities reveals a core, overarching challenge: the difficulty of reliably mapping objective, quantifiable physiological and neural signals to the high-level, subjective, and often ambiguous nature of human thoughts, feelings, beliefs, and intentions.18

Several factors contribute to this complexity:

• Many-to-Many Mapping: The relationship between signals and states is not straightforward. A single internal state (e.g., anxiety) can manifest through diverse patterns of physiological and neural activity across individuals or even within the same individual at different times. Conversely, a specific signal pattern (e.g., increased heart rate) can correspond to vastly different internal states (fear, excitement, physical exertion).18
• Context Dependence: The meaning or interpretation of a biological signal is heavily dependent on the context in which it occurs. EDA increase during a public speaking task likely signifies stress, while the same increase during exercise signifies physical exertion.20 Understanding the situation, ongoing activities, and environmental factors is crucial for accurate interpretation.
• Individual Variability: People differ significantly in their baseline physiological functioning, their reactivity to stimuli, and the specific ways their internal states manifest in measurable signals.20 Models trained on one group of individuals may not generalize well to others.
• Limitations of Current Models: Most current decoding approaches rely heavily on machine learning algorithms trained to find correlations between signal patterns and predefined labels (e.g., “stressed” vs. “relaxed,” “happy” vs. “sad”).21 While powerful for pattern recognition, these models often lack deep understanding of the underlying causal mechanisms and may struggle with novel situations or subtle states. Furthermore, establishing accurate “ground truth” labels for subjective internal states to train these models remains a significant methodological challenge.

This confluence of factors points to a fundamental “semantic gap” between the data we can measure and the experiences we aim to understand. Sensors provide low-level, quantitative data streams—voltages from EEG, conductance changes in EDA, BOLD signal fluctuations in fMRI, concentrations of molecules. In contrast, thoughts, beliefs, and nuanced feelings are high-level, qualitative, subjective, and imbued with meaning. Bridging this gap requires more than simply finding statistical correlations. It necessitates the development of models that can integrate information across multiple modalities and time scales, explicitly account for context and individual differences, potentially incorporate causal reasoning about physiological and psychological processes, and perhaps even interact with the individual (e.g., through feedback or incorporating self-reports) to arrive at a more valid interpretation of the meaning embedded within the complex symphony of biological signals. Simply mapping patterns to labels risks superficiality and misinterpretation; achieving deep understanding requires grappling with the inherent complexity and subjectivity of human experience.

Section 3: Japan’s Blueprint: Society 5.0 and the Moonshot Initiative

Against the backdrop of these advancing sensor and decoding technologies, Japan has articulated a bold national vision, Society 5.0, and launched ambitious research programs like the Moonshot Initiative to realize it. These initiatives provide a crucial strategic context, indicating a deliberate national effort to harness these technologies for specific societal transformations, including achieving a deeper understanding of human beings.

3.1 The Vision of Society 5.0: A Human-Centric Super Smart Society

Society 5.0 represents Japan’s forward-looking concept for the next stage of societal evolution, succeeding the Hunter-Gatherer (1.0), Agrarian (2.0), Industrial (3.0), and Information (4.0) societies.55 Officially introduced in the 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan (2016) and further elaborated in the 6th Plan (2021), it is defined as “a human-centered society that balances economic advancement with the resolution of social problems by a system that highly integrates cyberspace and physical space”.55

The core ambition is to create a “super smart society” that leverages the fusion of the digital (cyberspace) and real (physical space) worlds—often referred to as Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS)—to address pressing societal challenges.55 Japan faces significant demographic hurdles, including a rapidly aging population, a declining birthrate, and associated labor shortages, alongside needs for regional revitalization, enhanced disaster resilience, and environmental sustainability.56 Society 5.0 aims to tackle these issues by ensuring safety, security, comfort, and health for all citizens, enabling them to pursue diverse and fulfilling lifestyles regardless of age, location, or physical limitations.55

The technological foundation for Society 5.0 relies heavily on the deployment and integration of key digital technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT) for ubiquitous data collection, Big Data analytics for processing vast information streams, Artificial Intelligence (AI) for intelligent decision-making and automation, advanced Robotics, next-generation communication networks (5G and Beyond 5G), and the concept of Digital Twins, where elements of the physical world are mirrored and simulated in cyberspace.55 Realizing this vision also necessitates new forms of governance, moving towards multi-stakeholder models capable of managing the complexities of highly integrated CPS and ensuring trust, exemplified by initiatives like “Data Free Flow with Trust” (DFFT) promoted by Japan internationally.60

At its heart, Society 5.0 can be understood as a national strategy employing techno-solutionism—a belief in the power of technology to solve complex societal problems.56 It explicitly targets Japan’s deep-seated demographic and economic challenges with advanced technological interventions. However, the vision is deliberately framed within a “human-centered” narrative that emphasizes individual well-being, inclusivity, quality of life, and the realization of diverse forms of happiness.55 This distinguishes it from initiatives like Germany’s Industry 4.0, which has a stronger focus on industrial automation.55 This humanistic framing serves multiple purposes: domestically, it aims to alleviate anxieties about demographic change and economic stagnation by presenting a hopeful, technologically enabled future 68; internationally, it functions as a form of soft power, positioning Japan as a leader in designing future societies and setting global standards for data governance and technology deployment.65

3.2 Moonshot Goal 1: Liberating Humanity via Cybernetic Avatars

A key engine driving the realization of Society 5.0 is the Moonshot Research and Development Program, launched in 2020 to promote high-risk, high-impact R&D aimed at achieving ambitious, long-term goals.61 Among the most relevant goals for deep human understanding and integration is Moonshot Goal 1: “Realization of a society in which human beings can be free from limitations of body, brain, space, and time by 2050”.69 Managed by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), this goal seeks to overcome challenges like the aging population and labor shortages by enabling broader societal participation.70

The central technological concept underpinning Goal 1 is the Cybernetic Avatar (CA).71 CAs are envisioned as a suite of technologies—integrating robotics, AI, ICT, Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs), and advanced sensors—that significantly expand human physical, cognitive, and perceptual capabilities.71 They are conceived not merely as representations in virtual space, but as functional extensions of the human user, capable of acting and interacting within both physical and cyber environments, effectively allowing individuals to transcend their biological and geographical constraints.72

Goal 1 research encompasses several types of CAs and enabling technologies, pursued through distinct projects led by designated Project Managers (PMs) 73:

• Socio CAs: These avatars are designed to interact socially and provide services, enabling users to participate remotely in work, education, healthcare, and daily life.71 Projects focus on creating avatars capable of rich, empathetic communication (“hospitality-rich dialogue”) and facilitating the sharing of skills and experiences between individuals.71 A key target is enabling a single person to operate multiple avatars simultaneously with high fidelity.72 (PM: Ishiguro, Minamizawa)
• In-body CAs: This category pushes the frontier inward, aiming to monitor and potentially interact with the body’s internal environment.71

• In vivo CAs: These involve deploying millimeter-, micro-, and even nanoscale sensors or devices within the body to visualize health status, monitor physiological parameters, and enable ultra-minimally invasive diagnostics.71 (PM: Arai)
• Intracellular CAs: A more radical concept involves remotely controlled CAs operating at the cellular level, envisioned to patrol the body, inspect cells for malignancy or disease, potentially remove harmful cells, and effectively augment the body’s own immune system to maintain health and extend healthy lifespan.71 (PM: Matsumura)

• Enabling Technologies & Infrastructure:

• BMI-Controlled CAs: A project specifically focuses on developing the “ultimate BMI-CA” that can be intuitively controlled by the user’s intention, estimated by AI algorithms analyzing signals from the brain (invasive and non-invasive BMI, creating an “Internet of Brains” or IoB) and body surface information.71 (PM: Kanai)
• CA Infrastructure: Research is dedicated to building the necessary infrastructure for a CA society, including ensuring safety, security, and reliability (e.g., stable remote control even under poor network conditions), establishing legal and ethical frameworks (including E3LSI: Ethical, Economic, Environmental, Legal, and Social Issues), and developing methods for authenticating and notarizing CA operators and actions.71 (PM: Shimpo, Yamanishi)

The scope of Moonshot Goal 1 reveals an ambition that extends far beyond creating sophisticated telepresence robots. The explicit focus on augmenting human physical, cognitive, and perceptual abilities points towards a future of technologically enhanced humans.71 Furthermore, the concepts of in-body and intracellular CAs represent a move towards unprecedented levels of internal surveillance and potential intervention within the human body, down to the cellular level.71 The project aiming to decode user intention directly from brain signals via advanced BMI and AI 71 highlights the program’s engagement with the most direct interfaces between technology and the human mind. This convergence signifies a potential trajectory towards a radical blurring of the lines between human and machine, external observation and internal monitoring, and biological limits and technological enhancement, carrying profound implications for human identity and society.

3.3 Related Moonshot Goals: Synergies for Human Understanding

While Goal 1 is central to the theme of human augmentation and interaction via CAs, other Moonshot goals contribute synergistically to the broader aim of understanding and influencing human states, aligning with the Society 5.0 vision.

• Moonshot Goal 2: “Realization of ultra-early disease prediction and intervention by 2050”.69 This goal directly complements the health-related aspects of Goal 1’s in-body CAs. It focuses on understanding the complex network of interactions between human organs, developing mathematical models and AI to predict deviations from healthy states (like the breakdown of inter-organ networks leading to chronic diseases), and creating technologies for disease observation, measurement, analysis, and manipulation.69 Research under Goal 2 on advanced biosensing, AI-driven health prediction, and understanding dynamic homeostasis provides foundational knowledge and tools relevant for interpreting physiological signals gathered by CAs or other sensors for health monitoring and personalized medicine.71
• Moonshot Goal 3: “Realization of AI robots that autonomously learn, adapt to their environment, evolve in intelligence and act alongside human beings, by 2050”.69 This goal focuses on developing sophisticated AI and robotics capable of co-existing and collaborating with humans.69 The advancements in AI learning, adaptation, and human-robot interaction pursued under Goal 3 are directly applicable to the AI systems needed to control CAs in Goal 1, enabling them to operate semi-autonomously, interpret user intentions, and interact naturally with humans and the environment.71 Understanding how humans and intelligent machines can effectively coexist and collaborate is fundamental to the Society 5.0 concept.
• Moonshot Goal 9: “Realization of a mentally healthy and dynamic society by increasing peace of mind and vitality by 2050”.69 This goal tackles the subjective domain of mental well-being.69 Projects under this goal (led by PMs like Imamizu, Tsutsui, Hasida, Matsumoto, Yamada, Kikuchi, Kida, Takumi, Nakamura, Hosoda, Miyazaki, Shinoda, Hishimoto) likely involve research into the neural and physiological underpinnings of emotions, mood, stress, and vitality, potentially exploring ways to monitor and perhaps even modulate these states to enhance mental health.73 This aligns directly with the user query’s interest in understanding feelings and beliefs and contributes essential knowledge for creating technologies that genuinely support human well-being.

These overlapping and complementary goals suggest that the Moonshot program is designed not as a collection of isolated projects, but as an integrated R&D ecosystem. Advances in biosensing from Goals 1 and 2, AI and robotics from Goals 1 and 3, and computational neuroscience and psychology from Goal 9 are likely intended to cross-pollinate. This convergence aims to create a powerful, multifaceted toolkit for understanding human physiology, health, behavior, cognition, and potentially even subjective experience, all in service of achieving the broader, technologically-driven societal transformations envisioned in Society 5.0.

3.4 Strategic Alignment: Connecting Moonshot R&D to Society 5.0 Aspirations

The Moonshot Research and Development Program is explicitly positioned as a critical instrument for achieving the ambitious vision of Society 5.0.57 While Society 5.0 provides the overarching societal blueprint, Moonshot is designed to generate the necessary high-risk, high-impact “disruptive innovations” that can overcome major technological hurdles and enable the envisioned future.59

The alignment is evident in specific goals:

• Moonshot Goal 1’s Cybernetic Avatars directly address Society 5.0’s core concept of fusing cyberspace and physical space, overcoming limitations of body and location, enabling remote participation in all aspects of life, and enhancing productivity.55
• The focus on health monitoring and augmentation through in-body CAs (Goal 1) and ultra-early disease prediction (Goal 2) strongly supports Society 5.0’s emphasis on addressing the challenges of an aging population, promoting health and longevity, and delivering personalized well-being.55
• The development of advanced AI and human-machine/robot collaboration (Goals 1 and 3) is fundamental to the realization of the “Super Smart Society” where technology seamlessly integrates with human life to solve problems and create new value.55

This clear linkage reveals a highly strategic, top-down approach to national innovation in Japan. Society 5.0 represents the national vision, articulated and promoted by the highest levels of government (Cabinet Office) and influential industry bodies (Keidanren).55 The Moonshot program then serves as a key implementation engine, with substantial government funding channeled through agencies like JST and AMED to specific, ambitious R&D projects explicitly designed to deliver the foundational technologies required by the Society 5.0 vision.59 This structure indicates a concerted, long-term national strategy to proactively shape the future through targeted investment in potentially transformative science and technology.

Section 4: The AI Integrator: Weaving Heterogeneous Data into Meaning

The vision of understanding human states through ubiquitous sensing hinges critically on the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to make sense of the resulting data streams. These streams are inherently complex, diverse, and imperfect, posing significant challenges for integration and interpretation. Novel AI architectures and concepts, such as WiSE Relational Edge AI, hyperbolic geometry, and specialized memory systems, are being proposed as potential solutions to weave this heterogeneous data into meaningful insights.

4.1 Challenges in Fusing Complex Biological Data Streams

Integrating data from the diverse sensor modalities discussed previously (wearable, implantable, neural, biochemical, potentially quantum) presents formidable challenges for AI systems:

• Heterogeneity: Data arrives in various formats (time series, images, spectra), originates from different biological systems (ANS, CNS, circulatory), possesses different temporal and spatial scales, varying sampling rates, and distinct underlying characteristics.45 Combining ECG voltage traces with fMRI BOLD signals and discrete biomarker concentrations requires sophisticated alignment and fusion techniques.
• Noise and Artifacts: Biological measurements are intrinsically noisy, and signals are frequently corrupted by artifacts, such as movement affecting wearable PPG or EEG signals, or environmental interference.3 AI models must be robust to this noise or incorporate effective denoising steps.
• Sparsity and Missing Data: Continuous monitoring is often imperfect; sensors may temporarily disconnect, data transmission may fail, or measurements may only be available intermittently, leading to sparse or incomplete datasets.88
• High Dimensionality: Some data sources, particularly neuroimaging like fMRI or high-density EEG, generate extremely high-dimensional data, posing computational challenges for processing and modeling.21
• Complexity and Non-linearity: As discussed in Section 2, the relationships between measurable signals and the underlying physiological or psychological states are highly complex, dynamic, and non-linear.21 Simple linear models are often inadequate.
• Context and Individuality: The interpretation of signals is highly dependent on the situational context (e.g., resting vs. active) and varies significantly across individuals due to factors like genetics, health history, and personality.20 Models need to adapt to these variations.

Standard data fusion techniques, such as simple averaging of signals or concatenating feature vectors before feeding them into a classifier, often fail to capture the intricate temporal dependencies, cross-modal interactions, and contextual nuances present in complex biological data.52 Addressing these challenges necessitates advanced AI/ML approaches capable of robust feature extraction, learning meaningful representations from multi-modal data, handling uncertainty, modeling complex dynamics, and adapting to context and individual differences.13 Techniques like deep learning, particularly recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for time series data, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for spatial or spectral patterns, and attention mechanisms for focusing on relevant features across time or modalities, are proving crucial.21

The fundamental difficulty in fusing diverse biological signals for inferring human states lies in moving beyond mere pattern matching within isolated data streams. The real challenge is to develop AI systems that can understand and model the dynamic, context-dependent relationships between different signals, across various time scales and modalities. Biological systems are complex adaptive systems, where components interact in non-linear ways, and the system’s behavior emerges from these interactions. Effective AI integration must therefore capture this relational structure and dynamic behavior, moving towards a deeper, systems-level understanding rather than just classifying isolated signal features.88

4.2 WiSE Relational Edge AI, Hyperbolic Lensing, and GGAM: Theoretical Frameworks

Addressing the need for AI capable of relational understanding in complex systems, specific frameworks like WiSE Relational Edge AI, incorporating concepts like hyperbolic lensing and GGAM, have been proposed.88 Based on available descriptions, these concepts appear to represent a bespoke architecture tailored for this challenge:

• WiSE Relational Edge AI©: Described as both a “personalization engine” and a “complex adaptive system architecture,” WiSE aims to create human-machine synergies by leveraging machine learning combined with what is termed the “mathematics of personalization and relational intelligence”.88 Its core function is to uncover “hidden relationships and cycles” within complex, sparse, and multi-modal data, thereby providing clearer insights and facilitating better decision-making, especially under uncertainty.88 It operates through a dual-cycle architecture: a “fast cycle” identifies “divergent triggers” or anomalies, while a “slow cycle” integrates established knowledge, enables guided learning of unknown factors, verifies discoveries using “mathematical proof,” and interrelates findings.88 This process purportedly builds “Relational Intelligence” within the system. The “Edge” designation suggests processing occurs closer to the data source rather than solely in the cloud.88 Specific capabilities mentioned include WiSE Super Sensing (combining imperfect multi-modal data), WiSE Super Judgment (mapping complexity and handling biases), WiSE Ultra-Personalized Nudges, and WiSE Super-Verification.88
• Hyperbolic Lensing: This term is used in conjunction with WiSE AI, suggesting it’s a key technique employed.88 While not explicitly defined, in the context of recent ML research (discussed in 4.3), it most likely refers to the application of hyperbolic geometry for data representation and analysis. The “lensing” aspect might metaphorically imply an ability to focus on, magnify, or reveal specific structures or relationships within the data’s representation in hyperbolic space, perhaps by emphasizing hierarchical connections or navigating the curved geometry to find relevant patterns.
• GGAM (Granular to Geometric Associative Memory): Referred to as “granular to long-chained geometric associative memory,” GGAM is identified as a specific type of machine learning used within the WiSE framework.88 The name suggests a memory architecture capable of storing and retrieving information by linking fine-grained data points or features (“granular”) into larger, potentially complex associative structures (“long-chained geometric”). This could be relevant for modeling temporal dependencies, causal chains, or complex relationships between different pieces of information derived from the sensor data, possibly leveraging the geometric properties of hyperbolic space.

The proposed functionality of this integrated system (WiSE/Hyperbolic Lensing/GGAM) is ambitious: to move beyond traditional analytics by uncovering deep contextual insights from challenging data types (complex, sparse, multi-modal, imperfect, dynamic).88 It aims to converge individual and collective perspectives, reveal key connections between data points and underlying states, and augment the capabilities of existing technologies like conventional AI, Large Language Models (LLMs), and even Quantum Computing.88 The ultimate goal appears to be building a dynamic “map of the inherent complexity” of the system being monitored (e.g., a human individual) to enable more comprehensive understanding and navigation.88

The unique terminology and the explicit focus on “relational intelligence,” “complex adaptive systems,” “hyperbolic” structures, and “associative memory,” combined with edge processing capabilities, strongly suggest that WiSE/Hyperbolic Lensing/GGAM represents a specific, potentially proprietary AI architecture.88 It appears designed from the ground up to tackle the inherent difficulties of modeling dynamic, multi-scale biological systems using diverse and imperfect data streams. This contrasts with simply applying standard deep learning models, indicating an attempt to build in architectural features that promote a more nuanced, context-aware, and potentially causal understanding of how different signals relate to each other and to the overall state of the system.

4.3 Hyperbolic Geometry for Fusing Hierarchical and Uncertain Data

The reference to “hyperbolic lensing” within the WiSE framework points towards the burgeoning field of hyperbolic deep learning, which leverages the unique properties of hyperbolic geometry for data representation and analysis.89 Unlike Euclidean space (the familiar flat geometry), hyperbolic space has a constant negative curvature. This fundamental difference leads to distinct geometric properties, most notably that the volume of a sphere (or ball) in hyperbolic space grows exponentially with its radius, whereas it grows only polynomially in Euclidean space.90

This exponential growth makes hyperbolic space exceptionally well-suited for embedding hierarchical or tree-like structures with significantly less distortion than Euclidean space.89 Many real-world datasets, including biological systems, exhibit inherent hierarchies (e.g., genes -> pathways -> cellular functions -> tissue behavior -> organismal state). Hyperbolic embeddings can naturally represent these nested relationships, placing subordinate concepts within the space occupied by their parent concepts while maintaining appropriate distances.

This property, along with others, offers several potential advantages for fusing heterogeneous biological data:

• Modeling Inherent Hierarchies: Sensor data from different levels (e.g., molecular biomarkers, cellular activity via nanoprobes, organ-level function via ECG/HRV, system-level behavior via EEG) could be embedded in a shared hyperbolic space that reflects their natural hierarchical organization.90 This allows the AI to represent and reason about relationships across different scales of biological organization.
• Representing Uncertainty: The geometry of hyperbolic space offers potential ways to encode uncertainty. For instance, the distance of an embedding from the origin in the Poincaré disk model can be interpreted as a measure of confidence or specificity, with points closer to the origin representing more general or uncertain states.90 This could be valuable for fusing noisy or conflicting data from different sensors, allowing the model to represent its confidence in the fused state.
• Improved Few-Shot Learning: Studies in computer vision and other domains suggest that hyperbolic embeddings can lead to better generalization from limited training data.90 This is highly relevant for biological applications where data for specific states or rare conditions might be scarce.
• Enhanced Robustness: Hyperbolic learning has shown promise in improving robustness to noise and out-of-distribution data, which is crucial when dealing with imperfect signals from in vivo sensors.90
• Better Discrimination: The exponential expansion of distances in hyperbolic space can help to separate data points or classes that might appear close together in Euclidean space, potentially improving the ability to distinguish between subtly different physiological or cognitive states.93

Achieving these benefits involves employing specific ML techniques adapted for hyperbolic geometry. This includes learning hyperbolic embeddings (mapping data points to locations in a hyperbolic manifold like the Poincaré ball or hyperboloid model), using hyperbolic neural network layers (performing operations like convolutions or attention directly within the curved space), utilizing hyperbolic distance metrics for similarity calculations, training hyperbolic classifiers (e.g., using separating gyroplanes), and applying techniques like hyperbolic contrastive learning to structure the embedding space.89

The adoption of hyperbolic geometry for biological data fusion represents the imposition of a powerful geometric prior on the AI model.89 Instead of assuming a default flat Euclidean space, it assumes or actively seeks hierarchical structure within the data, leveraging the unique properties of negatively curved space to model it effectively. Given the inherently multi-scale, complex, and often hierarchical nature of biological organization and function, this geometric prior may offer a more natural and efficient way to represent the intricate relationships within and between diverse biological signals compared to traditional Euclidean approaches, potentially unlocking deeper insights that are obscured or distorted in flat representations.

4.4 Mechanisms for Creating a “Global Lens” on Human State

Integrating these advanced AI components—a relational framework like WiSE, geometric tools like hyperbolic embeddings, and potentially specialized memory like GGAM—provides a theoretical pathway towards creating the “Global Lens” mentioned in the user query. This lens would not be a simple aggregation of data but a unified, dynamic, and context-aware representation of an individual’s internal state, linked to specific internal or external triggers.

The process might unfold as follows:

1. Multi-Modal Data Acquisition and Feature Extraction: Continuous streams of data from diverse sensors (ANS, neural, biochemical, etc.) are collected and pre-processed. Relevant features are extracted from each modality.
2. Trigger Detection (WiSE “Fast Cycle”): The AI system continuously monitors the fused data streams, potentially using anomaly detection or rapid classification techniques operating on the integrated features. It identifies significant deviations from baseline or expected patterns that indicate a potential change in state or a response to a specific trigger (e.g., a sudden stressor, a cognitive challenge, the onset of a physiological event).88
3. Contextual Embedding and Integration (WiSE “Slow Cycle,” Hyperbolic Geometry, GGAM): Once a trigger or state change is detected, the system integrates this new information within a broader context. This likely involves:

• Hyperbolic Embedding: Mapping the features associated with the current state and trigger into a shared hyperbolic space. The location within this space reflects not only the current state but also its relationship to other states, potentially organized hierarchically.89
• Associative Memory (GGAM): Linking the current “granular” state embedding to past states, related triggers, and learned “long-chained” sequences or patterns stored in the geometric associative memory.88 This provides historical context and allows the system to understand trajectories and relationships over time.
• Relational Analysis (WiSE): The system analyzes the position and relationships of the current state within the learned map of the individual’s complex adaptive system, considering baseline physiology, recent history, and potentially established scientific knowledge integrated during the “slow cycle”.88 Uncertainty associated with the data or inference would also be represented, perhaps via the properties of the hyperbolic embedding.90

1. The “Global Lens” as Dynamic State Representation: The output of this process is the “Global Lens”—a rich, multi-faceted representation of the individual’s current state. It is not merely a snapshot but incorporates temporal dynamics, relational context, hierarchical structure, and uncertainty. It reflects the individual’s state in relation to the specific trigger, their personal history, and normative patterns, embodying the “Relational Intelligence” aimed for by WiSE.88
2. Synergistic Interpretation: This lens allows for an interpretation that leverages the complementary strengths of different sensor modalities—for example, combining the high temporal resolution of EEG for tracking rapid cognitive events with the continuous ANS monitoring from wearables for assessing overall stress and arousal, and perhaps targeted biomarker data for specific physiological context.45 The AI fusion process is key to unlocking this synergy, creating an understanding potentially greater than the sum of the individual data streams.45

Ultimately, the purpose of these sophisticated AI integrators extends beyond simply combining data streams. The goal is to leverage the fused information within the “Global Lens” to estimate the underlying, often unobservable, human state—be it cognitive load, emotional valence, physiological stress, or even intention—in real-time.47 Furthermore, this dynamic state estimation could potentially be used to predict future states, actions, or health outcomes.53 The “Global Lens,” therefore, serves as a continuously updated, context-rich state estimate, constructed from multiple, heterogeneous data sources interpreted through a relational, hierarchical framework potentially embodied by architectures like WiSE, hyperbolic geometry, and GGAM.

Section 5: Synthesizing the Future: Pathways, Potential, and Prudence

The convergence of advanced in vivo sensing, sophisticated AI-driven data fusion, and ambitious national visions like Japan’s Society 5.0 charts a potential trajectory towards unprecedented capabilities for understanding and interacting with human internal states. This final section synthesizes the preceding analysis to outline this pathway, explore its transformative potential, acknowledge the critical hurdles, address the profound ethical considerations, and offer recommendations for responsible navigation.

5.1 A Potential Pathway: Integrating Sensors and AI for Deep Human Insight

Based on the technologies and concepts reviewed, a plausible (though challenging) pathway towards achieving deep, real-time human insight can be envisioned:

1. Ubiquitous and Multi-Modal Sensing: The foundation involves the widespread deployment of diverse sensor technologies. This includes readily available wearables monitoring ANS and activity signals, environmental sensors capturing contextual data, and, in specific applications (e.g., clinical settings, specialized interfaces like CAs), potentially minimally invasive or implantable sensors providing access to biochemical markers or higher-fidelity neural signals (as explored in Section 1). Quantum sensors might initially feature in specialized research tools contributing to model development.
2. Intelligent Signal Processing and Feature Extraction: Raw data from these heterogeneous sensors undergoes sophisticated pre-processing to remove noise and artifacts. Relevant features capturing salient aspects of the signals across different domains (time, frequency, space) are extracted, often using domain knowledge and ML techniques.21
3. AI-Powered Relational Fusion: Advanced AI architectures, potentially incorporating principles like those suggested by WiSE, hyperbolic geometry, and GGAM, integrate these diverse features.88 This fusion process aims to create a unified, dynamic representation—the “Global Lens”—that captures not just individual signal values but also their complex interrelationships, hierarchical structures, temporal dependencies, contextual relevance, and associated uncertainties (as discussed in Section 4).
4. Context-Aware State Inference: The “Global Lens” representation is then interpreted by AI models to infer the individual’s underlying cognitive, emotional, and physiological state in relation to specific triggers or ongoing situations.52 This step bridges the “semantic gap” (Section 2.4), translating low-level signal patterns into higher-level state estimations.
5. Application and Adaptive Feedback: The inferred state information is utilized within various applications envisioned by frameworks like Society 5.0. Examples include triggering personalized health advice or interventions 3, enabling intuitive control of Cybernetic Avatars based on decoded intentions 71, optimizing human-machine teaming by adapting system behavior to human cognitive load or stress 52, or informing the design and operation of social systems.55 This application step can close the loop, providing feedback that influences the individual, the technology, or the environment.

This envisioned pathway describes more than just passive observation; it outlines the potential for a dynamic cybernetic loop. Information flows from the human’s internal state via sensors to AI systems for interpretation, and the resulting inferences can then flow back to influence the human (e.g., through a nudge or adapted interface), their technological extensions (like a CA), or their surrounding environment (a smart home adjusting conditions). This closed-loop nature, where sensing informs action which in turn affects the state being sensed, is a hallmark of cybernetic systems and carries significant implications for both empowerment and control.

5.2 Transformative Potential within Society 5.0

Should this technological pathway be successfully realized, the potential impacts, particularly within the context of Japan’s Society 5.0 goals, could be transformative:

• Hyper-Personalized Healthcare and Well-being: Continuous, multi-modal monitoring could enable ultra-early detection of disease onset, long before clinical symptoms manifest (aligning with Moonshot Goal 2).69 Real-time tracking of physiological and potentially mental states (related to Moonshot Goal 9) could allow for highly personalized interventions, lifestyle recommendations, and mental health support, tailored to individual needs and responses.3 In-body CAs (Goal 1) represent an extreme form of this, potentially offering continuous internal health surveillance and automated intervention.71
• Enhanced Human Capabilities and Inclusion (Goal 1): The ability to decode intention from neural signals could lead to truly intuitive control of Cybernetic Avatars, allowing individuals to overcome physical limitations and participate fully in society.71 CAs could enable seamless sharing of skills and experiences, fostering new forms of collaboration and co-creation.71 This technology promises greater inclusion for the elderly or those with disabilities, aligning with Society 5.0’s human-centric focus.76
• Optimized Human-Machine Collaboration: Real-time inference of human cognitive states (e.g., workload, attention, stress, fatigue) could enable AI systems, robots (Goal 3), and interfaces to adapt dynamically, creating safer, more efficient, and less taxing human-machine teams.52 Machines could anticipate human needs or provide support precisely when required.
• Deeper Social Understanding (Highly Speculative): While ethically fraught, the aggregation and analysis of anonymized data on individual states, beliefs, and responses across populations could potentially offer novel insights into social dynamics, cultural norms, collective sentiment, and the factors influencing societal well-being. This relates to the query’s mention of understanding “social beliefs, culture and therefore ideals of the better life.” However, the feasibility and ethical permissibility of such analyses are highly questionable.
• Realizing Society 5.0: Ultimately, the successful integration of these technologies could contribute significantly to achieving the overarching goals of Society 5.0: creating a sustainable, resilient, safe, secure, and comfortable society where technology empowers individuals to pursue diverse forms of happiness and well-being.55

However, this transformative potential inherently carries a duality. The same technologies that promise unprecedented levels of personalized healthcare, capability augmentation, and seamless human-machine synergy (forms of empowerment) could simultaneously enable fine-grained, pervasive monitoring, prediction, and potentially manipulation of human behavior, thoughts, and emotions on both individual and societal scales (forms of control).40 The ability to infer internal states could be used not only for support but also for surveillance or persuasion. Access to augmentation could become another axis of inequality. Whether the future realization leans towards the utopian “human-centric” vision of Society 5.0 or a more dystopian outcome depends critically on conscious design choices, robust ethical safeguards, effective governance, and the societal values prioritized during development and deployment. Navigating this empowerment-control duality is perhaps the central challenge.

5.3 Critical Hurdles: Technical, Scientific, and Validation Challenges

Beyond the profound ethical questions, significant technical and scientific obstacles must be overcome to realize the envisioned pathway.

• Sensor Technology Maturation: While wearables are common, their accuracy and robustness need improvement, especially for reliable decoding of subtle states.3 Advanced sensors (implantable, electrochemical, nano, quantum) face major hurdles in achieving long-term in vivo stability, biocompatibility, reliable power sources, and non-toxic operation.19 Reducing invasiveness while maintaining signal quality remains a key challenge.28 Quantum sensors, despite their sensitivity, face difficulties in maintaining coherence and achieving practical readout in biological environments.33
• Fundamental Signal-State Mapping: Our basic scientific understanding of precisely how complex internal states—nuanced emotions, abstract thoughts, beliefs, intentions—map onto measurable physiological and neural signals remains incomplete.18 Current knowledge is largely correlational. Establishing causal links and developing more comprehensive theoretical models that bridge the “semantic gap” between low-level signals and high-level experience is crucial for building truly meaningful decoding systems.53
• AI and Fusion Model Development: Creating AI algorithms (like those potentially represented by WiSE/Hyperbolic/GGAM) that can effectively fuse noisy, heterogeneous, multi-scale data is a major research challenge.52 These models need to be robust, scalable to handle vast data streams, generalizable across diverse individuals and contexts, and interpretable (Explainable AI – XAI) so their inferences can be trusted and understood.21 Effectively modeling uncertainty and incorporating contextual information dynamically are critical requirements.88
• Validation and Ground Truth: A persistent challenge is validating the accuracy of inferred internal states. Establishing reliable “ground truth” for subjective experiences like thoughts, feelings, or beliefs is notoriously difficult.27 Validation protocols need to move beyond controlled laboratory tasks to assess performance in complex, real-world scenarios. There is a significant risk that AI models might learn to exploit spurious correlations or artifacts in the data rather than genuinely decoding the intended state. Rigorous validation is essential to ensure reliability and avoid misleading interpretations.

These challenges are deeply interdependent, creating bottlenecks where progress in one area relies on advances in others. Better sensors are needed to provide cleaner, richer data for AI models to learn from, but more sophisticated AI is required to extract meaningful information from the noisy, complex data generated by current sensors.3 Both sensor development and AI model design are constrained by gaps in our fundamental scientific understanding of brain-body-mind connections, yet advancing that scientific understanding often requires better technological tools (sensors and AI) for measurement and analysis.11 Therefore, realizing the vision of deep human insight requires simultaneous and coordinated progress across sensor engineering, AI research, neuroscience, psychology, and robust validation methodologies.

5.4 Navigating the Labyrinth: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI)

The potential to access and interpret signals related to human internal states raises a complex web of ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) that demand careful consideration.

• Mental Privacy: The prospect of technologies inferring thoughts, emotions, intentions, or beliefs represents an unprecedented challenge to mental privacy.3 Questions arise about consent, data ownership, security of highly sensitive neural and physiological data, and the very right to keep one’s inner world private.
• Autonomy and Manipulation: If internal states can be reliably inferred, this information could potentially be used to influence individuals’ decisions, preferences, or emotional responses in ways they may not be aware of or consent to.51 This ranges from hyper-personalized advertising or political messaging to more subtle forms of behavioral control or induced dependency on technological feedback for self-regulation.
• Bias, Equity, and Fairness: AI models trained on data from specific

Works cited

1. A Review on the Vagus Nerve and Autonomic Nervous System During Fetal Development: Searching for Critical Windows – Frontiers, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.721605/full
2. The Integrative Action of the Autonomic Nervous System: Neurobiology of Homeostasis, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362049279_The_Integrative_Action_of_the_Autonomic_Nervous_System_Neurobiology_of_Homeostasis
3. Predicting stress levels using physiological data: Real-time stress …, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11230864/
4. Fight or Flight: The Sympathetic Nervous System | Live Science, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.livescience.com/65446-sympathetic-nervous-system.html
5. (PDF) Review of Stress Detection Methods Using Wearable Sensors – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378725858_Review_of_Stress_Detection_Methods_Using_Wearable_Sensors
6. Sympathetic Nervous System Overactivity and Its Role in the Development of Cardiovascular Disease | Physiological Reviews, accessed April 15, 2025, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/physrev.00007.2009
7. Heart rate variability (HRV) as a way to understand associations between the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and affective states: A critical review of the literature – PubMed, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37543289/
8. Impact of Heart Rate Variability on Physiological Stress: Systematic Review, accessed April 15, 2025, https://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol16no2/impact-of-heart-rate-variability-on-physiological-stress-systematic-review/
9. Chronic Stress and Headaches: The Role of the HPA Axis and Autonomic Nervous System, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/2/463
10. Photoplethysmography in Wearable Devices: A Comprehensive Review of Technological Advances, Current Challenges, and Future Directions – MDPI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/13/2923
11. Significance of an Electrochemical Sensor and Nanocomposites …, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00039
12. Autonomic nervous system and cardiac neuro-signaling pathway modulation in cardiovascular disorders and Alzheimer’s disease – PubMed Central, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926972/
13. (PDF) AI-Assisted Detection of Biomarkers by Sensors and Biosensors for Early Diagnosis and Monitoring – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382487014_AI-Assisted_Detection_of_Biomarkers_by_Sensors_and_Biosensors_for_Early_Diagnosis_and_Monitoring
14. AI-Assisted Detection of Biomarkers by Sensors and Biosensors for Early Diagnosis and Monitoring – PMC – National Institutes of Health (NIH), accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11274923/
15. The Integrative Action of the Autonomic Nervous System | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263694021_The_Integrative_Action_of_the_Autonomic_Nervous_System
16. Neuroscience, 3rd Edition, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.hse.ru/data/2011/06/22/1215686482/Neuroscience.pdf
17. Parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems interactively predict change in cognitive functioning in midlife adults – PubMed Central, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7722158/
18. people.ict.usc.edu, accessed April 15, 2025, https://people.ict.usc.edu/~gratch/CSCI534/Readings/ACII-Handbook-Physiology.pdf
19. In Vivo Organic Bioelectronics for Neuromodulation | Chemical Reviews, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00390
20. A Survey on fMRI-based Brain Decoding for Reconstructing Multimodal Stimuli – arXiv, accessed April 15, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.15978v1
21. Neural Decoding of EEG Signals with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review – MDPI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1525
22. Decoding Neural Signals with Computational Models: A Systematic Review of Invasive BMI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364985633_Decoding_Neural_Signals_with_Computational_Models_A_Systematic_Review_of_Invasive_BMI
23. Neuronal Control of Skin Function: The Skin as a Neuroimmunoendocrine Organ | Physiological Reviews, accessed April 15, 2025, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/physrev.00026.2005
24. Heart Rate Variability – What This Measure Means for Emotions …, accessed April 15, 2025, https://imotions.com/blog/learning/research-fundamentals/heart-rate-variability-emotions/
25. Stability of Enzymatic Biosensors for Wearable Applications | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317126050_Stability_of_Enzymatic_Biosensors_for_Wearable_Applications
26. Advances in Wearable Biosensors for Healthcare: Current Trends, Applications, and Future Perspectives – MDPI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/14/11/560
27. Trends in Heart-Rate Variability Signal Analysis – PMC, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8522021/
28. (PDF) Wearable and Implantable Biosensors: Mechanisms and Applications for Closed-Loop Therapeutic Systems – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382705536_Wearable_and_Implantable_Biosensors_Mechanisms_and_Applications_for_Closed-Loop_Therapeutic_Systems
29. Nanoparticle-Based and Bioengineered Probes and Sensors to Detect Physiological and Pathological Biomarkers in Neural Cells – PubMed Central, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4683200/
30. Advances in Intrathecal Nanoparticle Delivery: Targeting the Blood–Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier for Enhanced CNS Drug Delivery – MDPI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/17/8/1070
31. Human Brain/Cloud Interface – Frontiers, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2019.00112/full
32. Nanotechnology-Enabled Biosensors: A Review of Fundamentals, Design Principles, Materials, and Applications – PMC, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9856107/
33. Quantum photonics sensing in biosystems – AIP Publishing, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/app/article/10/1/010902/3329429/Quantum-photonics-sensing-in-biosystems
34. Quantum photonics sensing in biosystems – AIP Publishing, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/app/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0232183/20333391/010902_1_5.0232183.pdf
35. Quantum life science: biological nano quantum sensors, quantum technology-based hyperpolarized MRI/NMR, quantum biology, and quantum biotechnology – RSC Publishing, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/cs/d4cs00650j
36. Hybrid quantum sensing in diamond – Frontiers, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2024.1320108/full
37. A Molecular Approach to Quantum Sensing – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8161477/
38. A Molecular Approach to Quantum Sensing | ACS Central Science, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00737
39. HEART RATE VARIABILITY – DiVA portal, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1229983/FULLTEXT02.pdf
40. RESEARCH BRIEF BETWEEN SCIENCE-FACT AND SCIENCE-FICTION: INNOVATION AND ETHICS IN NEUROTECHNOLOGY – The Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Between%20Science-Fact%20and%20Science-Fiction%20Innovation%20and%20Ethics%20in%20Neurotechnology.pdf
41. Feasibility of decoding visual information from EEG – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2326263X.2023.2287719
42. Status of deep learning for EEG-based brain–computer interface applications – Frontiers, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncom.2022.1006763/full
43. Decoding Covert Speech From EEG-A Comprehensive Review – Frontiers, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.642251/full
44. Review of EEG Affective Recognition with a Neuroscience Perspective – MDPI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/4/364
45. [2502.19281] Integrating Biological and Machine Intelligence: Attention Mechanisms in Brain-Computer Interfaces – arXiv, accessed April 15, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19281
46. [2502.12048] A Survey on Bridging EEG Signals and Generative AI: From Image and Text to Beyond – arXiv, accessed April 15, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12048
47. Artificial Intelligence in Neuroscience: Affective Analysis and Health Applications, accessed April 15, 2025, https://theislamicmedicine.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/AI-bok_3A978-3-031-06242-1-1_compressed.pdf
48. Computational Approaches to Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Theory, Applications and Trends, accessed April 15, 2025, https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/89841/1/Computational_Approaches_to_Artificial_intelligence.pdf
49. Interfacing with the Brain: How Nanotechnology Can Contribute | ACS Nano, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.4c10525
50. Decoding thoughts, encoding ethics: A narrative review of the BCI-AI revolution – PubMed, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39719191/
51. Brain Recording, Mind-Reading, and Neurotechnology: Ethical Issues from Consumer Devices to Brain-Based Speech Decoding – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7417394/
52. (PDF) Multimodal Fusion for Objective Assessment of Cognitive Workload: A Review, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336005031_Multimodal_Fusion_for_Objective_Assessment_of_Cognitive_Workload_A_Review
53. (PDF) Modern Views of Machine Learning for Precision Psychiatry – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359728639_Modern_Views_of_Machine_Learning_for_Precision_Psychiatry
54. Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9676543/
55. Society 5.0 – Wikipedia, accessed April 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_5.0
56. Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-centered Society : Japan’s Science and Technology Policies for Addressing Global Social Challenges : Hitachi Review – Hitachihyoron, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.hitachihyoron.com/rev/archive/2017/r2017_06/trends/index.html
57. A People-centric Super-smart Society Hitachi-UTokyo Laboratory (H-UTokyo Lab.) – OAPEN Library, accessed April 15, 2025, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/41719/1/2020_Book_Society50.pdf
58. www8.cao.go.jp, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/sti_basic_plan.pdf
59. Society 5.0, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html
60. Governance Innovation, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.meti.go.jp/press/2021/07/20210730005/20210730005-2.pdf
61. The Moonshot Research and Development Programme – STIP Compass, accessed April 15, 2025, https://stip.oecd.org/moip/case-studies/16
62. Introducing Society 5.0 – Defence.AI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://defence.ai/perspectives/introducing-society-5/
63. (PDF) Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352260300_Society_50_A_Japanese_Concept_for_a_Superintelligent_Society
64. A wealth of joint project ideas sparked at the Moonshot Workshop on AI and Robotics in Tokyo – Swissnex, accessed April 15, 2025, https://swissnex.org/news/2nd_eu-jp_moonshot_workshop/
65. NetMission Digest – Issue #24: Digital Governance for Society 5.0 (Monday, November 18, 2024), accessed April 15, 2025, https://netmission.asia/2024/11/18/netmission-digest-issue-24/
66. Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society – MDPI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6567
67. Co-creating Digital Development to Achieve Society 5.0 for SDGs, accessed April 15, 2025, http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2020/056.pdf
68. discursive and material dimensions of the digital transformation: perspectives from and on japan, accessed April 15, 2025, https://nira.or.jp/paper/Discursive%20Workshop%20Report.pdf
69. Moonshot R&D｜TOP, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/
70. Moonshot Research and Development Program | Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development – AMED, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.amed.go.jp/en/program/list/18/03/001.html
71. www.naro.go.jp, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.naro.go.jp/laboratory/brain/english/MoonshotLeaflet_EN_Goal1to10.pdf
72. Cabinet Office’s Policy “Moonshot Goal 1” “Cybernetic Avatar” – iPresence, accessed April 15, 2025, https://ipresence.jp/en/magazine/20250107/
73. Goal 1: Overcoming limitations of body, brain, space and time｜Program｜Moonshot R&D, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/program/goal1/
74. Moonshot Goal 1:Science, Technology and Innovation- Cabinet Office Home Page, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/moonshot/sub1_en.html
75. Moonshot R&D | BRAIN, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.naro.go.jp/laboratory/brain/english/moon_shot/index.html
76. Hiroshi Ishiguro · Fuki Ueno · Eiki Tachibana Eds. – OAPEN Library, accessed April 15, 2025, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/96090/1/9789819737529.pdf
77. Moonshot R&D Leaflet (Goal 1-9), accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.naro.go.jp/laboratory/brain/english/MoonshotLeaflet_EN_Goal1to7.pdf
78. Moonshot R&D Program Overview, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/moonshot/pr/2p_leaflet_jp_2406en.pdf
79. Japan’s Digital Minister to become a cybernetic avatar – EurekAlert!, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/971483
80. Goal 1: KANAI Ryota Project｜Moonshot R&D, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/program/goal1/12_kanai.html
81. Title Anticipated technological breakthroughs and their possible impact on democratic legitimacy : ELSI and the political implic, accessed April 15, 2025, https://k-ris.keio.ac.jp/html/publish_file/100000893/11744902_pdf_input_1.pdf
82. Social Informatics Laboratories and Keio University’s Moonshot R&D Project will co-organize a symposium titled ‘Cybernetic Avatars and Digital Twin E3LSI Issue Deployment.’ | Topics – NTT Group, accessed April 15, 2025, https://group.ntt/en/topics/2023/11/06/e3lsi.html
83. JST International Symposium for Moonshot Goal 1 and Goal 3 – DWIH Tokyo, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.dwih-tokyo.org/en/event/moonshot/
84. “Empowering vitality and creativity in the global society through emotional inspiration and co-creation in music” Initiative Report, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/program/millennia/pdf/report_en_15_nishimoto.pdf
85. Holland Innovation Network Special – Artificial Intelligence, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.cag.edu.tr/uploads/site/lecturer-files/artificial-intelligence-holland-innovation-network-special-9RLN.pdf
86. Moonshot Reseach and Development Program – Science, Technology and Innovation- Cabinet Office Home Page, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/moonshot/top.html
87. Fiscal Year 2020 Project Manager Call for Application, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/application/202002/pdf/guidelines_en.pdf
88. Ipvive, Inc. | Personalized Understanding of Complexity in an Uncertain Future, that’s WiSE©, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.ipvive.com/
89. A Simple yet Universal Framework for Depth Completion – NIPS papers, accessed April 15, 2025, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/2a02b560822d564119fe3ac3be024ac6-Paper-Conference.pdf
90. (PDF) Hyperbolic Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Survey, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379305122_Hyperbolic_Deep_Learning_in_Computer_Vision_A_Survey
91. Hyperbolic Chamfer Distance for Point Cloud Completion and Beyond – arXiv, accessed April 15, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.17951v1
92. A Simple yet Universal Framework for Depth Completion – OpenReview, accessed April 15, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=Y4tHp5Jilp
93. Vison transformer adapter-based hyperbolic embeddings for multi …, accessed April 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10333307/
94. Hyp-OC: Hyperbolic One Class Classification for Face Anti-Spoofing – arXiv, accessed April 15, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.14406
95. On Hyperbolic Embeddings in 2D Object Detection – ResearchGate, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359254456_On_Hyperbolic_Embeddings_in_2D_Object_Detection
96. A Review of AI Cloud and Edge Sensors, Methods, and Applications for the Recognition of Emotional, Affective and Physiological States – MDPI, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/20/7824
97. Using Voice and Biofeedback to Predict User Engagement during Product Feedback Interviews – IRIS, accessed April 15, 2025, https://iris.cnr.it/bitstream/20.500.14243/499624/3/TOSEM___Audio_and_Biofeedback_Analysis___Final_version%20%282%29.pdf

Cybernetic Avatar Technology and Social System Design for Harmonious Co-experience and Collective Ability, accessed April 15, 2025, https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/program/goal1/files/13_minamizawa_ap.pdf