The Divergent Geometries Shaping Our Understanding of the Sciences

Co-created by the Catalyzer Think Tank divergent thinking and Gemini Deep Research tool.

Geometry, at its core, provides the fundamental language for describing the spatial relationships and structures that underpin the natural world. For centuries, the framework established by Euclidean geometry reigned supreme, serving as the bedrock upon which scientific understanding was built. The systematic and logical structure presented in Euclid’s Elements became a paradigm of a well-founded science, influencing thinkers for millennia.1 There was a pervasive belief that this geometry was not merely a mathematical construct but an accurate and singular description of reality itself.4 However, the 19th century witnessed a profound paradigm shift with the emergence of non-Euclidean geometries.2 This intellectual revolution stemmed from investigations into the intricacies of Euclid’s parallel postulate, ultimately revealing that altering this seemingly self-evident principle could lead to the development of perfectly consistent alternative geometric systems.7 Among these new frameworks, hyperbolic and quantum geometry have risen to prominence, offering unique perspectives that are increasingly relevant to modern scientific inquiry. This report aims to delineate the fundamental differences between the classical Euclidean framework and these non-Euclidean counterparts, exploring their respective and evolving roles in shaping our comprehension of the sciences of chemistry, biology, and physics.

The Pillars of Euclidean Geometry: Axioms, Postulates, and Fundamental Concepts

The edifice of Euclidean geometry is constructed upon a foundation of axioms and postulates, meticulously laid out in Euclid’s seminal work, Elements.4 These are the self-evident truths upon which all subsequent theorems and propositions are logically derived. Euclid began by outlining five axioms, also known as common notions, which address fundamental concepts of equality and the relationship between wholes and their parts.9 These include the assertions that things equal to the same thing are also equal to one another, that adding equals to equals results in equal wholes, and that subtracting equals from equals leaves equal remainders. Further axioms state that things which coincide with one another are equal, and that the whole is greater than the part.9

Alongside these axioms, Euclid presented five postulates that specifically pertain to geometry.4 The first postulate states that a straight line segment can be drawn joining any two points.7 The second allows for any straight line segment to be extended indefinitely in a straight line.7 The third postulate describes the construction of a circle with any center and any radius.7 The fourth asserts that all right angles are congruent to one another.7 The fifth postulate, often referred to as the parallel postulate, is the most intricate, stating that if a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, then the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, will meet on that side on which the angles are less than the two right angles.4 This postulate has been reformulated in more modern terms, such as Playfair’s axiom, which states that through a given point not on a given line, there is exactly one line in the plane of the point and the line that does not meet the given line.4

From these foundational axioms and postulates, a wealth of key concepts and theorems are derived.5 These include the fundamental properties of lines, angles, triangles (where the sum of interior angles invariably equals 180 degrees), and circles. The notions of congruence and similarity of geometric figures are central, defined by theorems such as Side-Angle-Side (SAS), Angle-Side-Angle (ASA), and Side-Side-Side (SSS).12 The Pythagorean theorem, which establishes the relationship between the sides of a right-angled triangle, is another cornerstone of Euclidean geometry.12 Furthermore, the parallel postulate underpins the unique properties of parallel lines, asserting their existence and uniqueness.5

The fifth postulate, concerning parallel lines, held a unique status among Euclid’s initial assumptions.3 Its relative complexity and less intuitive nature compared to the other postulates led many mathematicians over centuries to question whether it could be derived as a theorem from the remaining, simpler postulates. This enduring quest to either prove or disprove the parallel postulate ultimately paved the way for one of the most significant developments in the history of mathematics: the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries. The parallel postulate, in essence, became the crucial point of divergence, the axiomatic fulcrum upon which the distinct characteristics of Euclidean and hyperbolic geometry would come to rest.

The Emergence of Non-Euclidean Geometry: Hyperbolic Space

The historical journey towards understanding the parallel postulate was marked by centuries of intellectual endeavor. Mathematicians like Gerolamo Saccheri, Carl Friedrich Gauss, János Bolyai, and Nikolai Lobachevsky grappled with this seemingly problematic axiom.7 Many attempted to prove it from the other postulates, often by assuming its negation and seeking a logical contradiction.3 These investigations, while failing to achieve their initial goal, yielded a collection of intriguing and often counterintuitive results. The culmination of these efforts arrived in the early 19th century with the independent and simultaneous development of hyperbolic geometry by the Russian mathematician Nikolai Lobachevsky and the Hungarian mathematician János Bolyai.7 Notably, Carl Friedrich Gauss had also explored these ideas earlier but had not published his findings.7 He did, however, recognize the profound genius in Bolyai’s work.19

The fundamental departure of hyperbolic geometry from its Euclidean counterpart lies in the replacement of Euclid’s parallel postulate with an alternative, often termed the hyperbolic axiom.6 While the Euclidean parallel postulate asserts that through a point not on a given line, there exists exactly one line parallel to the given line 4, the hyperbolic axiom posits that through such a point, there are at least two distinct lines that do not intersect the given line.6 This seemingly subtle change in the axiomatic foundation has profound and far-reaching consequences for the entire structure of the geometry. It is worth noting that the geometry derived from Euclid’s first four postulates, without the fifth, is known as absolute geometry. This framework forms a common ground upon which both Euclidean and hyperbolic geometries are built.7

The act of negating the parallel postulate is the central defining characteristic of hyperbolic geometry, leading to a spatial structure that diverges dramatically from the familiar Euclidean plane. This single alteration at the axiomatic level unleashes a cascade of differences in the fundamental properties of lines, angles, and shapes within this newly conceived space.

Key Differences and Properties of Hyperbolic Geometry Compared to Euclidean Geometry

The divergence in the parallel postulate between Euclidean and hyperbolic geometry leads to a number of fundamental differences in their properties:

• Parallel Lines: In Euclidean geometry, for any line and a point not on that line, there is precisely one line passing through the point that is parallel to the given line. These parallel lines maintain a constant distance from each other and never intersect, no matter how far they are extended.4 Conversely, hyperbolic geometry posits that through a point not on a given line, there are infinitely many lines that do not intersect the given line.6 These non-intersecting lines fall into two categories: limiting parallels (which asymptotically approach the given line) and ultraparallels (which diverge from the given line).27 Unlike Euclidean parallels, hyperbolic parallel lines are not equidistant; they either converge in one direction and diverge in the other, or diverge in both directions.21
• Angles of Triangles: A cornerstone of Euclidean geometry is the theorem that the sum of the interior angles of any triangle is always exactly 180 degrees (π radians).4 In stark contrast, in hyperbolic space, the sum of the interior angles of any triangle is always strictly less than 180 degrees (π radians).18 The difference between 180 degrees and the actual sum of the angles is termed the angular defect, and this defect is directly proportional to the area of the hyperbolic triangle.23
• Curvature: Euclidean geometry describes a space with zero curvature, often visualized as a flat plane.35 Hyperbolic geometry, on the other hand, is characterized by a constant negative curvature.18 This negative curvature gives hyperbolic space a saddle-like shape locally.35
• Similarity: In Euclidean geometry, the concept of similarity allows for triangles (and other polygons) to have the same angles but different side lengths and areas; they are essentially scaled versions of each other.12 However, a remarkable property of hyperbolic geometry is that if two triangles have the same angles, they must also have the same side lengths and the same area; they are necessarily congruent.21 This implies that there is an absolute unit of length inherent to hyperbolic space.30
• Distance: In Euclidean geometry, the shortest distance between any two points is always a straight line.14 While this holds true in hyperbolic geometry as well, with the shortest paths being along geodesics (the equivalent of straight lines), the behavior of these lines, especially over large distances, differs significantly due to the curvature of the space.21
• Circumference and Area of Circles: For a circle of radius r in Euclidean geometry, the circumference is given by 2πr and the area by πr².17 In hyperbolic geometry, the circumference of a circle with radius r is greater than 2πr*, and the area of the enclosed disk grows exponentially with the radius.27

The constant negative curvature that defines hyperbolic space is a fundamental characteristic that sets it apart from the flat Euclidean realm. This intrinsic curvature is the underlying reason for many of the seemingly paradoxical properties of hyperbolic geometry, such as the diminished angle sum of triangles and the complex behavior of lines that are considered parallel.

Applications of Euclidean Geometry in Classical Sciences

Euclidean geometry has served as an indispensable framework for understanding and modeling the macroscopic world across various scientific disciplines. Its intuitive nature and mathematical tractability have made it a cornerstone of classical science.

In physics, Euclidean geometry underpins the formulation of classical mechanics. Newton’s laws of motion, which describe the relationship between forces and the motion of objects, are inherently based on a Euclidean understanding of space and geometry.43 Concepts such as vectors, which represent quantities with both magnitude and direction, trajectories of moving objects, and the very notion of force fields are all rooted in the spatial reasoning established by Euclid.43 Similarly, classical electromagnetism, as described by Maxwell’s equations, has traditionally been understood within the context of three-dimensional Euclidean space, providing a framework for analyzing the distribution and interaction of electric and magnetic fields.49 While more advanced approaches in thermodynamics may employ non-Euclidean concepts, classical thermodynamics often utilizes Euclidean space to represent thermodynamic state variables and their relationships.54 For instance, the graphical representation of the internal energy function often involves a Cartesian coordinate system, a direct application of Euclidean principles.55

In the realm of chemistry, Euclidean geometry plays a crucial role in describing the structure of molecules. The Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory, a fundamental model for predicting the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms in a molecule, relies on Euclidean geometric shapes such as linear, trigonal planar, and tetrahedral arrangements to explain molecular geometry.48 Furthermore, the field of crystallography, which focuses on the arrangement of atoms in crystalline solids, is deeply intertwined with Euclidean geometry. The classification of crystal structures into different systems and the analysis of their symmetries are based on the principles of repeating units within a three-dimensional Euclidean space.60

Biology, too, has benefited immensely from the application of Euclidean geometry. In anatomy, the basic description of biological structures, the measurement of distances and angles within the body, and the understanding of the spatial relationships between different organs and tissues are all fundamentally rooted in Euclidean concepts.48 Even simple descriptions of the shapes of cells and basic organisms often rely on Euclidean geometric terms. While more sophisticated approaches are emerging, the foundational understanding of biological form at a macroscopic level has been largely shaped by the principles of Euclidean geometry.

The enduring utility of Euclidean geometry across these classical scientific domains stems from its direct correspondence to our everyday perception of space and its relatively straightforward mathematical framework. This has allowed for the development of powerful models and theories that have driven scientific progress for centuries.

The Realm of Hyperbolic Geometry: Beyond Flat Space

While Euclidean geometry has long been the dominant framework, hyperbolic geometry is increasingly recognized for its relevance in understanding complex systems across various scientific disciplines.

In modern physics, hyperbolic geometry finds applications in several cutting-edge areas. Some approaches to quantum gravity, the elusive theory that seeks to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, explore the possibility that the fundamental structure of spacetime might involve non-Euclidean geometries, including hyperbolic space.70 For instance, loop quantum gravity investigates the quantization of spacetime geometry, suggesting a discrete, potentially non-Euclidean structure at the Planck scale.78 String theory, another leading candidate for a theory of quantum gravity, utilizes hyperbolic geometry to describe exotic phenomena such as the geometry experienced by D-branes and the concept of T-duality.70 Notably, anti-de Sitter (AdS) space, a space with constant negative curvature closely related to hyperbolic space, is central to the influential AdS/CFT correspondence, which connects string theory to quantum field theories.82 Although current cosmological observations suggest that the large-scale geometry of our universe is either flat or very slightly curved, hyperbolic geometry remains a theoretical possibility and is explored in models of the very early universe, such as loop quantum cosmology, which considers quantum geometry effects on spacetime.77

Emerging applications of hyperbolic geometry are also being explored in chemistry. Researchers are investigating whether hyperbolic space might offer a more natural and accurate way to represent complex molecules and their inherent hierarchical structures compared to traditional Euclidean models.42 The tree-like structure inherent to hyperbolic geometry could allow for a more efficient and less distorted representation of molecules with branching structures. This approach holds the potential for improved accuracy in modeling molecular interactions and predicting their properties.

The significance of hyperbolic geometry is particularly growing in biology. Biological systems often exhibit complex hierarchical organization, and hyperbolic geometry provides a natural metric for networks with such structures, including phylogenetic trees and neural networks.42 Its exponentially expanding resolution allows for a better representation of intricate hierarchies with less distortion compared to the limitations encountered in Euclidean space.88 Furthermore, non-Euclidean geometries, including hyperbolic geometry, are being investigated for their potential to describe the organization of genomes and the fundamental principles governing genetic information.90 Connections have been observed between hyperbolic geometry and the fractal-like structure of DNA sequences.98 Even in the realm of protein folding, hyperbolic surfaces have been proposed as effective approximations for certain protein secondary structures, such as beta-sheets.90 Finally, the growth and behavior of biological tissues are also being modeled using the principles of hyperbolic geometry.86

The increasing relevance of hyperbolic geometry in modern science underscores its unique ability to capture the inherent curvature and hierarchical organization present in many natural phenomena, extending our understanding beyond the limitations of flat Euclidean space.

Exploring Quantum Geometry: A Deeper Dive into the Fabric of Spacetime

Delving into the realm of the very small, quantum geometry emerges as a set of mathematical concepts that aim to generalize our understanding of geometry to describe the physical phenomena that occur at distance scales comparable to the Planck length (approximately 1.6 x 10⁻³⁵ meters).70 At these incredibly minute scales, the principles of quantum mechanics exert a profound influence on the nature of spacetime itself.71 Quantum geometry challenges the classical view of space and time as smooth and continuous entities, suggesting instead that they might possess a discrete, granular structure at the most fundamental level.72

Several theoretical frameworks are being explored to formulate a comprehensive theory of quantum geometry. One prominent approach is loop quantum gravity (LQG), where quantum geometry refers to a specific mathematical formalism in which physical observables related to geometry, such as area and volume, are quantized.71 This quantization leads to the prediction of discrete spectra for these geometric quantities, hinting at a fundamental discreteness of spacetime at the Planck scale, often visualized as a “quantum foam”.78 Another leading framework, string theory, also incorporates the concept of quantum geometry.70 In this context, quantum geometry often refers to quantum corrections to the metric tensor that describes the shape of spacetime, particularly as experienced by fundamental objects called D-branes.70 String theory also explores phenomena like T-duality and mirror symmetry, which suggest a more intricate and less intuitive relationship between geometry and physics at the quantum level.71 A third approach, noncommutative geometry, offers an alternative perspective by replacing the standard commutative algebra of functions on a manifold with a noncommutative algebra, providing a way to define geometry on such algebraic structures.71

Intriguingly, there appear to be connections between quantum geometry and hyperbolic space. In string theory, the geometry of anti-de Sitter space, which possesses a constant negative curvature akin to hyperbolic space, plays a significant role, particularly in the AdS/CFT correspondence.82 The term “quantum hyperbolic geometry” has also emerged in specific theoretical frameworks, suggesting a deeper relationship between these two seemingly distinct areas of mathematics and physics.105 The fact that the hyperbolic plane is a space with constant negative curvature might make it relevant in certain scenarios within the broader context of quantum gravity.

Ultimately, the pursuit of quantum geometry is driven by the fundamental goal of providing a unified description of gravity and quantum mechanics, two pillars of modern physics that currently remain incompatible at the most fundamental level. Success in this endeavor could lead to revolutionary insights into the nature of fundamental particles, their interactions, and the very fabric of spacetime.

Quantum Geometry and its Relevance to Chemistry and Biology

The direct applications of quantum geometry within the fields of chemistry and biology are currently less established compared to its role in theoretical physics. However, the underlying principles of quantum mechanics are undeniably fundamental to both these disciplines, suggesting potential future connections.

The field of quantum information geometry represents one area where the mathematical tools of differential geometry, quantum mechanics, and information theory are blended.72 This interdisciplinary field explores the geometric structures arising in the space of quantum states and could potentially offer new ways to understand and analyze quantum systems relevant to chemistry and biology. For instance, quantum mechanics governs the nature of chemical bonding and the intricate interactions between molecules at a fundamental level. It is conceivable that the concepts and tools of quantum geometry could provide a more profound understanding of these interactions, particularly in complex chemical reactions or in the behavior of biological systems at the nanoscale.

Looking towards the future, quantum geometry might offer insights into phenomena like quantum entanglement within biological systems, an area of active research and debate. Furthermore, the rapid advancements in fields like quantum computing and quantum materials, which are deeply rooted in the principles of quantum mechanics and potentially quantum geometry, could indirectly impact chemistry and biology by providing new tools and platforms for research and discovery. While the direct applications of quantum geometry in these fields are still in their nascent stages, the fundamental role of quantum mechanics suggests that this area holds exciting possibilities for future scientific understanding.

Comparative Analysis: Euclidean vs. Hyperbolic vs. Quantum Geometry

To better understand the fundamental differences between these geometric frameworks, a comparative analysis of their key properties is presented in the table below:

Feature	Euclidean Geometry	Hyperbolic Geometry	Quantum Geometry
Parallel Postulate	Unique parallel line	Infinitely many parallels	Not a direct concept
Angle Sum of Triangle	180 degrees	< 180 degrees	Fluctuating, scale-dependent
Curvature	Zero	Constant Negative	Complex, scale-dependent
Similarity	Similar figures exist	Similar figures congruent	Not a direct concept
Space	Flat	Saddle-shaped	Quantized, discrete?
Scale Dependence	Scale invariant	Absolute scale	Planck scale relevant

Each of these geometric frameworks offers a unique lens through which to view and interpret the natural world. Euclidean geometry, with its flat space and straightforward rules, has proven remarkably effective for describing the macroscopic world we experience, forming the basis of classical physics and providing an intuitive framework for understanding basic molecular structures and anatomy. However, its limitations become apparent when dealing with systems that exhibit significant curvature or hierarchical organization.

Hyperbolic geometry, characterized by its constant negative curvature and inherent tree-like structure, emerges as a powerful tool for understanding complex networks and hierarchical systems, particularly in biology. Its ability to represent intricate relationships with less distortion than Euclidean space makes it increasingly relevant in fields like genomics, neuroscience, and molecular modeling. Moreover, it plays a significant role in theoretical physics, particularly in the context of quantum gravity and string theory.

Quantum geometry, on the other hand, delves into the very fabric of spacetime at the Planck scale, where quantum effects dominate. It challenges our classical notions of space and time, suggesting a quantized and potentially discrete structure. While still a field under intense development, quantum geometry holds the promise of providing a unified description of gravity and quantum mechanics and could potentially offer new insights into the fundamental nature of matter and the universe.

The choice of which geometric framework is most appropriate depends critically on the scale and complexity of the system being studied. For everyday macroscopic phenomena, Euclidean geometry remains a valuable and effective tool. However, as we probe the universe at its most fundamental level or explore the intricate organization of biological systems, non-Euclidean geometries like hyperbolic and quantum geometry provide essential frameworks for advancing our scientific understanding.

Conclusion: The Evolving Landscape of Geometry in Scientific Understanding

The journey of geometry in science reflects a continuous process of evolution and refinement. From the long-standing dominance of Euclidean geometry, which provided the initial mathematical language for describing the natural world, to the emergence and increasing relevance of non-Euclidean frameworks such as hyperbolic and quantum geometry, our understanding of space and its intricate relationship with physical phenomena has undergone a profound transformation.

The discovery of non-Euclidean geometries in the 19th century shattered the long-held belief in the absolute and singular nature of Euclidean space, opening up new avenues for mathematical and scientific exploration. Hyperbolic geometry, with its inherent negative curvature and capacity to naturally represent hierarchical structures, has proven to be an invaluable tool in diverse fields ranging from theoretical physics to biology, offering new perspectives on complex systems that defy simple Euclidean descriptions.

Quantum geometry represents a further radical departure from classical geometric concepts, venturing into the realm of the Planck scale to grapple with the fundamental quantum nature of spacetime itself. While still in its developmental stages, it holds the potential to revolutionize our understanding of gravity and the very fabric of reality.

The increasing recognition and application of non-Euclidean geometries across various scientific disciplines underscore the dynamic and evolving nature of our understanding of the universe. As we continue to probe deeper into the mysteries of nature, from the smallest quantum scales to the vast expanse of the cosmos and the intricate organization of life itself, the diverse languages of geometry will undoubtedly continue to play a pivotal role in shaping our scientific comprehension. The choice of the appropriate geometric framework, tailored to the specific scale and complexity of the system under investigation, will be crucial in unlocking new insights and furthering our quest to understand the fundamental principles that govern the universe.

Works cited

1. Epistemology of Geometry – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 3, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-geometry/
2. Nineteenth Century Geometry – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 3, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/geometry-19th/
3. Postulates in Geometry and Philosophy Michael Fogleman, St. John’s College, Annapolis – Digital Showcase @ University of Lynchburg, accessed April 3, 2025, https://digitalshowcase.lynchburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=agora
4. The Axioms of Euclidean Plane Geometry – Brown Math Department, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.math.brown.edu/tbanchof/Beyond3d/chapter9/section01.html
5. Parallel postulate | Euclidean, Non-Euclidean, Axiom | Britannica, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/parallel-postulate
6. Non-Euclidean geometry – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Euclidean_geometry
7. Euclid’s Postulates — from Wolfram MathWorld, accessed April 3, 2025, https://mathworld.wolfram.com/EuclidsPostulates.html
8. Postulate | mathematics – Britannica, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/postulate
9. AXIOMS AND POSTULATES OF EUCLID – Simon Fraser University, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.sfu.ca/~swartz/euclid.htm
10. Euclid’s Postulates, accessed April 3, 2025, https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/class/harvard/113/97/html/euclid.html
11. Euclidean Geometry – Definitions, Axioms and Postulates | CK-12 Foundation, accessed April 3, 2025, https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-cbse-math-class-9/section/5.2/primary/lesson/euclid%E2%80%99s-definitions-axioms-and-postulates/
12. Euclidean geometry | Definition, Axioms, & Postulates – Britannica, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/Euclidean-geometry
13. Geometry/Five Postulates of Euclidean Geometry – Wikibooks, open books for an open world, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Geometry/Five_Postulates_of_Euclidean_Geometry
14. Euclidean Geometry (Definition, Facts, Axioms and Postulates) – BYJU’S, accessed April 3, 2025, https://byjus.com/maths/euclidean-geometry/
15. 4.1: Euclidean geometry – Mathematics LibreTexts, accessed April 3, 2025, https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/Mount_Royal_University/Mathematical_Reasoning/4%3A_Basic_Concepts_of_Euclidean_Geometry/4.1%3A_Euclidean_geometry
16. byjus.com, accessed April 3, 2025, https://byjus.com/maths/euclidean-geometry/#:~:text=Here%20are%20the%20seven%20axioms,equals%2C%20the%20remainders%20are%20equal.
17. Euclidean geometry – Plane Geometry, Axioms, Postulates – Britannica, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/Euclidean-geometry/Plane-geometry
18. Hyperbolic geometry: history, models, and axioms – DiVA portal, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:729893/FULLTEXT01.pdf
19. Non-Euclidean geometry – MacTutor History of Mathematics, accessed April 3, 2025, https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/Non-Euclidean_geometry/
20. MATH 392 – Geometry Through History Bolyai-Lobachevsky Theorem and Hyperbolic Pythagorean Theorem February 22, 24, 26 Recap In, accessed April 3, 2025, https://mathcs.holycross.edu/~little/GeomThroughHist/BolyaiLobachevsky.pdf
21. Hyperbolic geometry | Non-Euclidean, Lobachevsky, Bolyai – Britannica, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/hyperbolic-geometry
22. Hyperboloid | Surfaces, Geometry, Equations – Britannica, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/hyperboloid
23. Hyperbolic Geometry — from Wolfram MathWorld, accessed April 3, 2025, https://mathworld.wolfram.com/HyperbolicGeometry.html
24. WHAT IS HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY? Euclid’s five postulates of plane geometry are stated in [1, Section 2] as follows. (1) Each pair – OSU Math, accessed April 3, 2025, https://math.osu.edu/sites/math.osu.edu/files/hyperbolicGeometry.pdf
25. Chapter 4: Introduction to Hyperbolic Geometry – Mathematics, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.ms.uky.edu/~droyster/courses/spring02/classnotes/chapter04.pdf
26. 1 Hyperbolic Geometry The fact that an essay on geometry such as this must include an additional qualifier signifying what kind, accessed April 3, 2025, https://documents.kenyon.edu/math/atwell.pdf
27. Hyperbolic geometry – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_geometry
28. www.britannica.com, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/hyperboloid#:~:text=hyperbolic%20geometry,-mathematics&text=Simply%20stated%2C%20this%20Euclidean%20postulate,parallel%20to%20the%20given%20line.
29. Hyperbolic space | mathematics – Britannica, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/hyperbolic-space
30. Hyperbolic Geometry, Section 5, accessed April 3, 2025, https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~mec/Winter2009/Mihai/section5.html
31. Hyperbolic geometry – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_geometry
32. neutral geometry – PlanetMath, accessed April 3, 2025, https://planetmath.org/neutralgeometry
33. Modelling Hyperbolic Geometry, accessed April 3, 2025, https://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~borgerse/Presentations/0205-SIAM.pdf
34. www.britannica.com, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/hyperbolic-geometry#:~:text=Simply%20stated%2C%20this%20Euclidean%20postulate,parallel%20to%20the%20given%20line.
35. 15.2 Basic concepts of hyperbolic geometry – Fiveable, accessed April 3, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/hs-honors-geometry/unit-15/basic-concepts-hyperbolic-geometry/study-guide/P1wtOMjr3pmLp2p5
36. Hyperbolic parallel postulate – (Honors Geometry) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed April 3, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/hs-honors-geometry/hyperbolic-parallel-postulate
37. www.cs.unm.edu, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.cs.unm.edu/~joel/NonEuclid/proof.html#:~:text=The%20only%20difference%20between%20the,a%20proof%20in%20hyperbolic%20geometry!
38. NonEuclid: 7: Axioms and Theorems – UNM CS, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.cs.unm.edu/~joel/NonEuclid/proof.html
39. Confused About Different Types of Geometry : r/learnmath – Reddit, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/10wbwrc/confused_about_different_types_of_geometry/
40. Euclidean and Hyperbolic Conditions – CSUSM, accessed April 3, 2025, https://public.csusm.edu/aitken_html/m410/conditions.08.pdf
41. Non-Euclidean geometries | Thinking Like a Mathematician Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed April 3, 2025, https://fiveable.me/thinking-like-a-mathematician/unit-8/non-euclidean-geometries/study-guide/YFNr0rg2sU0yT5Pf
42. Hyperbolic Brain Representations – arXiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.12990v1
43. www.historymath.com, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.historymath.com/euclidian-geometry/#:~:text=In%20physics%2C%20Euclidean%20geometry%20underpins,spatial%20reasoning%20established%20by%20Euclid.
44. What is the historical significance of the Euclidean method in physics? | History of the World | QuickTakes, accessed April 3, 2025, https://quicktakes.io/learn/history-of-the-world/questions/what-is-the-historical-significance-of-the-euclidean-method-in-physics
45. Euclidean Geometry – (History of Science) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed April 3, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/history-science/euclidean-geometry
46. Euclidean geometry from classical mechanics – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0020739890200306
47. Euclidian Geometry – History of Math and Technology, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.historymath.com/euclidian-geometry/
48. Euclidean geometry – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_geometry
49. www.longdom.org, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.longdom.org/articles/euclidean-space-a-journey-into-the-foundations-of-geometry-106042.html#:~:text=Physics%3A%20Classical%20mechanics%20and%20electromagnetism,3D%20objects%20in%20virtual%20environments.
50. Euclidean Space: A Journey into the Foundations of Geometry – Longdom Publishing SL, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.longdom.org/articles/euclidean-space-a-journey-into-the-foundations-of-geometry-106042.html
51. Geometry of Electromagnetism and its Implications in Field and Wave Analysis, accessed April 3, 2025, https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/icap06/papers/MOA1MP02.pdf
52. Inside Perspectives on Classical Electromagnetism – arXiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0504089
53. On the geometry of electromagnetism, accessed April 3, 2025, https://faculty.washington.edu/seattle/physics544/2011-lectures/bossavit.pdf
54. pubs.aip.org, accessed April 3, 2025, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/84/2/910/18956596/910_1_online.pdf
55. Thermodynamics and geometry – AIP Publishing, accessed April 3, 2025, https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article-pdf/29/3/23/8280818/23_1_online.pdf
56. Geometric thermodynamics – Mathematics Department, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.math.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/~jnatar/MAGEF-24/trabalhos/Joao_Figueiredo.pdf
57. (PDF) Thermodynamics and geometry – ResearchGate, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258879552_Thermodynamics_and_geometry
58. Ruppeiner geometry – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruppeiner_geometry
59. Geometry of Molecules – Chemistry LibreTexts, accessed April 3, 2025, https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_(Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry)/Chemical_Bonding/Lewis_Theory_of_Bonding/Geometry_of_Molecules
60. www.worldscientific.com, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/8519#:~:text=Crystallographic%20groups%20are%20groups%20which,to%20infinity%20in%20all%20directions).
61. crystallographic group in nLab, accessed April 3, 2025, https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/crystallographic+group
62. Geometry of Crystallographic Groups | Algebra and Discrete Mathematics, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/13685
63. Geometry of Crystallographic Groups | Algebra and Discrete Mathematics, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/8519
64. (PDF) On Euclidean, spherical and hyperbolic crystallography – ResearchGate, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378796745_On_Euclidean_spherical_and_hyperbolic_crystallography
65. Crystal system – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia – CLASSE (Cornell), accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.classe.cornell.edu/~dms79/xrd/CrystalSystems-Wikipedia.htm
66. Geometry of Anatomy | intension designs, accessed April 3, 2025, https://intensiondesigns.ca/geometry-of-anatomy/
67. Computational anatomy – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_anatomy
68. Geometry for Anatomy (11w5018) Workshop Objectives – Banff International Research Station, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.birs.ca/workshops/2011/11w5018/report11w5018.pdf
69. Algorithms to automatically quantify the geometric similarity of anatomical surfaces – PNAS, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1112822108
70. en.wikipedia.org, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_geometry#:~:text=More%20technically%2C%20quantum%20geometry%20refers,brane%20wrapped%20on%20this%20cycle.
71. Quantum geometry – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_geometry
72. Quantum Geometry: Principles, Applications | Vaia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.vaia.com/en-us/explanations/math/geometry/quantum-geometry/
73. Quantum geometry and quantum gravity – GFM, accessed April 3, 2025, http://gfm.cii.fc.ul.pt/research/areas/quantum_geometry_quantum_gravity/
74. phys.libretexts.org, accessed April 3, 2025, https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Astronomy__Cosmology/Supplemental_Modules_(Astronomy_and_Cosmology)/Cosmology/Carlip/Quantum_Geometry#:~:text=Loop%20quantum%20gravity%20is%20the,piece%20of%20a%20larger%20structure).
75. Loop Quantum Gravity – Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, accessed April 3, 2025, https://igc.psu.edu/topics/loop_quantum_gravity/
76. [2201.09143] Quantum Geometry II : The Mathematics of Loop Quantum Gravity Three dimensional quantum gravity – arXiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.09143
77. Loop quantum cosmology – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_cosmology
78. Loop Quantum Gravity – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed April 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5567241/
79. FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURE OF LOOP QUANTUM GRAVITY | International Journal of Modern Physics D, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218271807010894
80. www.marcosmarino.net, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.marcosmarino.net/uploads/1/3/3/5/133535336/string-geometry.pdf
81. [2407.09049] String Geometry Theory and The String Vacuum – arXiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09049
82. String theory – Wikipedia, accessed April 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory
83. The geometry of our world: M-theory and 11D geometry – Physics World, accessed April 3, 2025, https://physicsworld.com/a/the-geometry-of-our-world-m-theory-and-11d-geometry/
84. The Shape of Inner Space: String Theory and the Geometry of the Universe’s Hidden Dimensions: 9780465020232 – Amazon.com, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Shape-Inner-Space-Universes-Dimensions/dp/0465020232
85. Math 324 – Amberly Warner – Marywood University, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.marywood.edu/programs/resources/math-research-amberly-warner-hyperbolic.pdf
86. Hyperbolic geometry of gene expression | bioRxiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.27.270264v1.full-text
87. Hyperbolic Geometric Latent Diffusion Model for Graph Generation – arXiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2405.03188v1
88. Navigating Memorability Landscapes: Hyperbolic Geometry Reveals Hierarchical Structures in Object Concept Memory | bioRxiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.22.614329v1.full
89. An argument for hyperbolic geometry in neural circuits – NSF-PAR, accessed April 3, 2025, https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10120231
90. Hyperbolic geometry of gene expression – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed April 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970362/
91. be.ucsd.edu, accessed April 3, 2025, https://be.ucsd.edu/seminar/2024/hyperbolic-geometry-and-information-acquisition-biological-systems#:~:text=Across%20different%20scales%20of%20biological,of%20its%20exponentially%20expanding%20resolution.
92. Hyperbolic geometry and information acquisition in biological systems | Shu Chien, accessed April 3, 2025, https://be.ucsd.edu/seminar/2024/hyperbolic-geometry-and-information-acquisition-biological-systems
93. Hyperbolic Geometry in Biological Systems – ResearchGate, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360368453_Hyperbolic_Geometry_in_Biological_Systems
94. Hyperbolic geometry in biological systems – eScholarship, accessed April 3, 2025, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fj7p2r1
95. Hyperbolic geometry of gene expression – PubMed, accessed April 3, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33748711/
96. Hyperbolic geometry of gene expression – bioRxiv, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.27.270264v1.full.pdf
97. Milenkovic gaining biological insights by analyzing data embedded in non-Euclidean spaces | Coordinated Science Laboratory, accessed April 3, 2025, https://csl.illinois.edu/news-and-media/58879
98. Non-Euclidean Biosymmetries and Algebraic Harmony in Genomes of Higher and Lower Organisms – ResearchGate, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367999391_Non-Euclidean_Biosymmetries_and_Algebraic_Harmony_in_Genomes_of_Higher_and_Lower_Organisms
99. Non-Euclidean Biosymmetries and Algebraic Harmony in Genomes of Higher and Lower Organisms | EPJ Web of Conferences, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2021/02/epjconf_mnps2021_01010/epjconf_mnps2021_01010.html
100. Non-Euclidean Biosymmetries and Algebraic Harmony in Genomes of Higher and Lower Organisms – EPJ Web of Conferences, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2021/02/epjconf_mnps2021_01010.pdf
101. Geometry of protein structures. Why hyperbolic surfaces are a good approximation for beta-sheets – ResearchGate, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228090809_Geometry_of_protein_structures_Why_hyperbolic_surfaces_are_a_good_approximation_for_beta-sheets
102. Geometry of Protein Structures. I. Why Hyperbolic Surfaces are a Good Approximation for Beta-Sheets – ScholarWorks@UTEP, accessed April 3, 2025, https://scholarworks.utep.edu/cs_techrep/299/
103. A hyperbolic curvature flow for biological tissue growth – School of Mathematics and Physics – The University of Queensland, accessed April 3, 2025, https://smp.uq.edu.au/event/session/5175
104. Hyperbolic Geometry in Biological Materials – World Scientific, accessed April 3, 2025, http://www.asiapacific-mathnews.com/05/0502/0021_0030.pdf
105. Gear Lectures on Quantum hyperbolic geometry – FSU Math, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.math.fsu.edu/~ballas/gear_retreat/assets/frohmannotes.pdf
106. Quantum hyperbolic geometry – Project Euclid, accessed April 3, 2025, https://projecteuclid.org/journals/algebraic-and-geometric-topology/volume-7/issue-2/Quantum-hyperbolic-geometry/10.2140/agt.2007.7.845.full

What is Quantum Geometry? – AZoQuantum, accessed April 3, 2025, https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=424